similar to: Debian packaging: newest git version?

Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system, so "the current Debian Testing binary packages" are worthless to us. On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:42:45AM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > Any response would be welcome :-) > > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > > Currently,

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1) >> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the >> syslinux-6.04-pre2 distro alongside the existing pxelinux.0 > > > Please avoid the official binaries from Syslinux 6.04-pre2 and > 6.04-pre3. Additionally, the current git

Dear gentlemen, I think I'd better start another thread for this... thanks to Ady Ady and Gregory Lee Bartholomew for their responses to my early question. Just for the record, my fresh experience with PXElinux 6.x follows: syslinux.efi version 6.03 does boot to the extent that it shows a prompt, but if I provide it with a CFG file containing several labels, no matter what label I type

Hi good day, can anybody please assist me to get PXE booting with syslinux, and EFI systems. PXE EFI Architecture-7 (64bit)? What I have tried: 1) Syslinux 6.03 -> Looks like a bug -> does not work because syslinux.efi tries to download ldlinux.e64 but from the DHCP server, in stead of the PXE boot server (the server that provided "option 60" and the boot file

Hello, I am using lpxelinux.0 (latest stable version 6.03, using the official binaries from kernel.org) to kickstart servers as http transfers really helps over links with poor latencies... These servers are being booted in legacy mode, not in UEFI. This has worked very well until recently. Starting with RHEL 7.5, on some servers, we would see the machine rebooting while pxelinux is in the

Hi, We have been using isolinux 3.75 for a while now, to support pxelinux and UEFI we were going to update to 6.03, but seeing 6.04 has but fixes, decided to go with 6.04-pre3. First, is that about read for a "make official' ? Second, I did have to modify gnu-efi/inc/efilinks.h for the build to complete (had to remove the (intptr_t) which doesn't belong in EFI/EDK). So I've

Hey, I am running a custom-built router (based on a PCengines apu2c4 board, see https://github.com/rtr7/router7 for details) on which I am using PXE boot for recovery purposes, i.e. reverting to an older version of the software/configuration. In this scenario, my workstation acts as the DHCP, TFTP and HTTP server, and my router PXE boots into a recovery program. I have noticed a couple of times

We've been successfully installing Linux using pxelinux to bootstrap our Linux (CentOS) installs for many years, but we are about to take delivery of hardware that doesn't have legacy BIOS boot support for internal drives - so I'm making my first foray into the world of EFI - and can _almost_ get it all to work, but hit an issue that I'm not sure how to 'fix' ...

I have a project G4L that has used syslinux for many years. I've upgraded the syslinux from the kernel.org builds over the years up to 6.03 and just copied the newer files, and it has worked. Saw that the new build machine I setup with Fedora 30 had the version 6.04 files. I tried the same process, and then booting the iso comes up with message that it can not load ldlinux.c32, which is

Thanks for the hints - I have NOT CONFIG_EFI enabled - do I need this actually? I do not know which variables I need to boot... The kernel APPEND parameters are sufficient for me... And the relocatable config is set already. .. I enabled the EFI kernel config parts - no change... the console prints: Booting System... Loading linux... ok Loading iramfs.gz...ok [then reboot] My syslinux.cfg is

Gene Cumm wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:47 AM James Pearson via Syslinux > <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote: >> >> Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >>> >>>> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1) >>>> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the >>>>

Hello there I built development version of syslinux from git 6.04-pre3-3-(sometag) and I am trying to boot a slackware-current system with it. I do not use a separated partition for `/boot`. It's just `/dev/sda1` here for `/` and `/boot` is just a folder. I simply use `mbr.bin` against a DOS partition table and the first partition having the bootable flag. With this layout, the only

On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> the PXELINUX log line is >> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter >> Anvin et al), > > (snip) > > FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good > for troubleshooting. > > Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would

hpa wrote: > On July 7, 2019 8:37:10 AM PDT, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt at gmx.de> > wrote: > >Gene, > > > >it looks like the syslinux master branch is broken since February > >[1]. Peter created the wip.makefixes branch but I wasn't able to get > >it working (yet) and it lacks activity since March. > > > >I think it might be time to revert

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > > Currently, the Syslinux-related binary packages in Debian are: > > _ extlinux > _ isolinux > _ pxelinux > _ syslinux > _ syslinux-common > _ syslinux-efi > _ syslinux-utils > > The list of packages and their

Hello friends! HAXM is a hardware-assisted virtualization engine (hypervisor) that uses Intel Virtualization Technology to speed up IA (x86/ x86_64) emulation on a host machine running Windows or macOS. Latest Isolinux 6.03 hangs under VM after "Main image LBA =...". Please, help us investigate the root of the problem. Bug on github: https://github.com/intel/haxm/issues/15 Thank you!

Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:19:43 +0000 Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > When you say "new syslinux version from git", do you mean the git > head in anonscm.debian.org/git... (Debian's source code for > Syslinux-related packages), or rather the upstream Syslinux git head > (in repo.or.cz... or in git.zytor.com...)? Sorry for the confusion: I

On 03/08/2016 02:53 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > > Poma, in my opinion, this behavior means it's your/Fedora's responsibility > to propose a change that distinguishes between broken and working NASM > 2.11.06 or revert the commit in your/Fedora's build. > Yes, it is highly problematic to have especially build tools with version numbers that don't match upstream having

Hello, Thank you, for this information. This is, what I need. So I will switch from 6.03 to the last 6.04 pre. Regards Johann > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Syslinux <syslinux-bounces at syslinux.org> Im Auftrag von Ady Ady via > Syslinux > Gesendet: Montag, 15. April 2019 18:53 > An: syslinux at syslinux.org > Betreff: Re: [syslinux] EFI32, EFI64 on one

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) > > > In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ >