similar to: Can Syslinux install another USBstik ?

When a USBstiked-syslinux starts, it's the PC's firmare that's reading the USB ? But once the USBsyslinux takes over, has IT also got a USB driver? Since my MotherBoard & 2009 Slackware built USBstik syslinux booter were stolen I bought a <WinTel> laptop and USBextender to access my old IDE & SATA disks. With WinTel's new arrangement of not allowing the tail of the

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:45 AM, eas lab via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>Do you mean boot SYSLINUX from stik-A but then load files like a >>kernel/initrd from stikB:partition5? It's possible but only from a >>development version of Syslinux that has the multifs patch merged. > > Yes: before my x86MotherBoard & <syslinux>USBstik were stolen,

>Do you mean boot SYSLINUX from stik-A but then load files like a >kernel/initrd from stikB:partition5? It's possible but only from a >development version of Syslinux that has the multifs patch merged. Yes: before my x86MotherBoard & <syslinux>USBstik were stolen, I could edit the <syslinux prompt> to boot to different partitions of the attatched IDE & SATA. Now

Yes this is the SAME question, that I can't get an answer from a month ago! I have the files, from a USBstik [now stolen] which I previously could edit at boot time, to boot any of my IDE or SATA partitions. Now, with a laptop, I want to boot the same IDE or SATA via a USB-adaptor to IDE/SATA. And also I want to boot a Toshiba 500GB USB disk. The obvious question is: why [if] the old system

> I don't think that syslinux be in concern here. If I understand well > Slackware is installed on a hard disk partition that you want to access > through the USB-adaptor to IDE/SATA. No. I'm not married to Slak. It's important to distinguish between verbatim/pasteable and what the old-writer merely thinks/remembers. I want to be able to boot ANY installation/partition as I

I've been using linux:TC from a USBstik in order to not break the M$ capability, as previously always happened. Since TC runs in RAM, it has many extra problems; like reinstalling all the apps and your private settings at each boot. The sample isolinux.cfg which I've been emailed by the oficianado is very unfamiliar and worrying. Where is the official syntax ? -- Without knowing if/how

I want to be able to make a USBbootStik for my laptop, as I repeatedly did for the now stolen PC. I've got a copy of the required 2009, Slackware13 partition, saved to a USBdisk. And I've located the 175-line: <make bootStik script> . Of course just "chroot"ing Slak13, won't allow <make bootStik>. But why can't someone here, provide the info to make an

Previously I've been using a laptop with an "Aptio Setup Utility...2015" to "Disable UEFI Boot" and allow a USBstik with partition1 having: /boot/isolinux/isolinux.bin , isolinux.cfg , menu.c32...etc. to boot 64bit TinyCore. Now this newer laptop has: "Aptio Setup Utility...2018" which is completely different from the 2015 version. I fail to boot linux from

I have a windows server with a 250G drive the drive is partitioned as follows. partition 1: dell utility partition partition 2: fat32 windows c: partition partition 3: extended partition partition 5: logical NTFS partitition. NTFS partition was setup with 220G. but only about 18G was being used, so i shrank NTFS down to 50G. now i want to make a drive image to create a HVM domain. how can

AIM: from <isolinux> on USBstikA, boot Debian7 installation on USBstikB. EXISTING STATE: USBstikA is TinyCore64bit booter, with:- /boot/isolinux/* 61312 Oct 26 2016 menu.c32 24576 Oct 26 2016 isolinux.bin 2069 Nov 22 01:24 isolinux.cfg ... USBstikB-partition3: Currently boots a 32bit installation, via GRUB using the entry:----- menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux

My previous question: "can syslinux on a USBstik also boot installations on other USB devices ?" got no proper reply, so I'm now including more background detail. The new problem is that my 32bit partition of ETHOberon, only gives a proper font-size under Debian7:DVDinstaller:rescueMode, since I'm forced to use a laptop, after my previous systems were stolen. Neither gnome nor

I have not seen anybody on the web to have found this so I thought I would check here. Anybody got this firmware? I've found firmware for the 400, but it doesn't seem to load in the 410.

I have upgraded the GXP-2000 to the newest firmware 1.0.1.12<http://1.0.1.12>and the phone is much more usable However, I still have two slight sound quality issues: 1) There is static on the line at all times. It is not that noticable to me, but when I make calls out the PSTN the person on the other end hears it. If I use a Cisco ATA with an analog phone and call the same person again

On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/23/2017 11:04 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> I have three different types of CentOS 6 Xen 4.4 based hypervisors (by >> hardware) that are experiencing stability issues which I haven't been >> able to track down. All three types seem to be having issues with NIC >> and/or PCIe. In most cases, the issues are

I can't get my 7960 to upgrade to 7.2 or infact downgrade to 6.3 either. when I change image_version to the 7.2 string in sipdefault.cnf it reboots but does not look for any image files it just looks for the same files as it normally does. Any ideas? it seems as though I have locked the firmare. Chris

On 02/21/2017 05:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 02/21/2017 11:50 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> >>> Kevin, >>> >>> Please try the 4.9.11-22 kernel that I just released for CentOS-6 (along >>> with the newer linux-firmare packages and xfsprogs). >>> >>> If you enable

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:11:32PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 11:59:47 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Once we get to a conclusion I can send a series with only the device and firmare > > abstractions such that we can get them in outside of the scope of the reset of > > both series to get your

Hello Friends, This is my first post on CentOS mailing list. I am using CentOS since last 3 years and using Linux since 2003. I am Java Based ERP(http://ofbiz.apache.org/) developer and I truly appreciate the stability of CentOS as the Desktop machine for the developers. In the early 2003 I was using CentOS 4 then I moved to CentOS 5 stable release then before 1.5 month I installed CentOS 5.2

Back in January I started having a problem with my Sipura (and there was at least one other on the list with the same problem) that if I answer an incoming call (via X100P) on line 1 of my Sipura, the caller cannot hear any voice from the internal extension. If the internal user puts the external user on hold (via flash hook) and returns, both directions of audio are fine. Line 2 never has

P? Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:38:05 -0500 Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> skrev: > > On Oct 3, 2019, at 6:24 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer > > <gjn at gjn.priv.at> wrote: > > > > > > 07:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Intel Corporation > > C602 chipset 4-Port SATA Storage Control Unit [8086:1d6b] (rev 06)? > > > > what