similar to: "isolinux.bin missing or corrupt" when booting USB flash drive in old PC

Hi, MartinS wrote: > Is it the isohdppx or isohdpfx (or both) that is relevant? The file /.disk/mkisofs in the ISO tells that option -isohybrid-mbr syslinux/usr/lib/ISOLINUX/isohdpfx.bin was used. (This file is a Debian specialty.) I guess you can see at the first bytes of the ISO that the partition interpreter code is not there. > For isohdpfx.bin it will print: > E if EBIOS >

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > My main point of interest is which block is really loaded as first one > of isolinux.bin. [Program snipped.] > (It could be shorter if i did not insist in big endian words.) Why insisting? Anyway appended is a dumper version. I could put up a binery version if needed. Let me know if so. -- MartinS /*

Hi, given the fact that the conversion has the factor HC*SH = "secpercyl", which is invariant under swapping, there remains as suspect in read_sector_cbios only this division: divb (sectors) There is a suspicious discrepancy in the code: heads = (stack-16) sectors = (stack-18) ... /* here we computer CHS values or just do some dummy computation for EBIOS */ andw $0x3f,

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:38:31PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > isohdpfc pushes the CX value to the stack which it gets from INT 13 AH 41. > Quite surely bit 0 of that CX is not set. But bit 2 "Enhanced Disk Drive" > could be set. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INT_13H > > I understand on David's BIOS after > > andw $1,%cx

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:03:35AM +0100, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > I think we should offer David a binary which he can combine with > the MBR of the ISO and the image with the recognizable blocks. > I will later today upload a binary version of my block producer > and post the URL. > > The combination will be: > 432 bytes from Martin's MBR > 80 bytes

Hi, i am looking now at the code which i assume loads the rest of isolinux.bin. The entry point for program execution from the MBR is obviously at http://git.zytor.com/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/core/isolinux.asm#n186 (Do i get it right that this is the Intel syntax ? (Gronfff)) If POP yields the victim of the most recent not yet popped PUSH, then this does not look correctly coordinated

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I have some problems understanding the details of the program's flow. > > - The code inside PARTITION_SUPPORT is supposed to be inactive with > MBR isohdpfx.bin. It belongs to isohybrid --partok which is equivalent > to MBRs isohdppx*.bin. Debian uses isohdpfx.bin. Yes. isohdpfx.bin is generated from isohdpfx.S in which PARTITION_SUPPORT is not

Hi, funny or enlightening observation: With my qemu-system-i386 it would work if the detected Heads/Cylinder and Sectors/Head factors would change positions ! The effective read operation seems to use H/C = 32 , S/H = 63. The correct LBA would be addressed by H/C = 63 , S/H = 32. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reasoning: I have transplanted the

Hi, i have uploaded a little gz compressed tarball http://scdbackup.webframe.org/block_seq.tgz containing -rwxr-xr-x thomas/thomas 4552 2017-03-21 09:23 block_seq -rw-r--r-- thomas/thomas 315 2017-03-21 09:22 block_seq.c To be unpacked in a suitable directory by tar xvzf block_seq.tgz The binary "block_seq" was compiled on Debian Jessie. If it does not run, do cc -o

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I ponder whether it would be possible to create a diagnostic MBR > which does not necessarily have to boot but rather tells what the > isohybrid MBR would perceive: Presence of partition table, > EBIOS or CBIOS, block address used with INT 13, content of the block > read by the first INT 13, ... ... > The diagnostic MBR should only use 432 bytes because at

Hi, Gene Cumm wrote: > it seems the stack format got > set, changed, then mostly reverted back, with this code being the last > piece missing from 2009. The commit to isohdpfx.S of 2009-05-31 looks incomplete. The sequence of the stack pointers was swapped, but the sequence of stack pushes was not.

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Martin Str|mberg via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:38:31PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: >> isohdpfc pushes the CX value to the stack which it gets from INT 13 AH 41. >> Quite surely bit 0 of that CX is not set. But bit 2 "Enhanced Disk Drive" >> could be set. >>

From: MartinS <ams at ludd.ltu.se> isohdp[fp]v.S which says E or C if EBIOS or CBIOS is used. isohdppv.S also says G or M if a GPT or MBR partition is detected. Signed-off-by: MartinS <ams at ludd.ltu.se> --- Comments? diff --git a/mbr/Makefile b/mbr/Makefile index be2bded..7095396 100644 --- a/mbr/Makefile +++ b/mbr/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ include $(MAKEDIR)/embedded.mk all:

Hi, Geert Stappers wrote: > Contact David off-list, he did unsubscribe. Can you tell when he unsubscribed (i.e. which of the messages he got as last one) ? > Martin posted elsewhere in this thread "Thomas, you found the bug" > and provided a patch. Open question is whether the fix helps with David's BIOS. The newest answer from Martin indicates that a failure to read

Hi, C/H/S addressing and reading of first block seems to be ok in isohdpfd.bin. The main suspect for the failure of the attempt with isohdpfd.bin is the number or content of the blocks read after the first one. But i have no clue why isohdpfc.bin should do better than isohdpfd.bin. They differ just by one instruction (JC = 0x72 versus JMP = 0xEB) which both are performed before the reading and

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:06:12PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > There is a suspicious discrepancy in the code: > > heads = (stack-16) > sectors = (stack-18) > > ... > /* here we computer CHS values or just do some dummy computation for EBIOS */ > andw $0x3f, %cx /* Sector count */ > popw %bx /* EBIOS flag */ > pushw %cx /* -16: Save

On 03/18/2017 03:02 PM, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Hi, > > David Christensen wrote: >> I use this USB flash drive for bootable installer images; I do not >> attempt to mount it. I don't know that I could, even if I wanted to: > > mkdir /mnt/iso > mount /dev/sdc /mnt/iso > > or, because partition 1 starts at block 0, you may mount it too >

It is good to see this ----- Forwarded message from syslinux-bot for Martin Str|mberg <ams at ludd.ltu.se> ----- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 05:54:09 -0700 From: syslinux-bot for Martin Str|mberg <ams at ludd.ltu.se> To: Syslinux commits mailing list <syslinux-commits at zytor.com> Cc: ams at ludd.ltu.se Subject: [syslinux:master] mbr/isohdpfx.S: correct pointer for heads/sectors

CC:ing syslinux David Christensen reports that my latest isohdpfd.bin reported C, thus it failed early (carry set) in finding an EBIOS. My interpretation is that it must corrupt CX so isolinux is fooled into trying EBIOS first. So, again David, can you please try this one: <http://www.ludd.ltu.se/~ams/tmp/isodavid.tgz> To keep your (our?) spirits up I've named it of you. It

On 03/18/2017 01:18 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > Some of the things you should / could (re)test / (re)try: > > _ Verify the md5sum of the ISO image. SHA256 verified for downloaded image and for contents of USB flash drive (see below). > _ Is this particular USB device _still_ capable of booting newer > computers? Yes. > What happens if you would try _again_ to boot a