similar to: yasm

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90000 matches similar to: "yasm"

2017 Jan 29
1
yasm
Can Syslinux be built with yasm rather than NASM? Richard
2010 Nov 30
2
Syslinux Digest, Vol 92, Issue 25
Sorry Gene, I got the version of binutils is 2.17. I download the latest Binutils to make the *objdump* and *objcopy*. with both of these utilities to create new pxelinux.raw. then, the error message shows me that, objcopy -O binary pxelinux.elf pxelinux.raw ../lzo/prepcore pxelinux.raw pxelinux.bin ../lzo/prepcore: pxelinux.raw: output too big (30165, max 0) make[1]: *** [pxelinux.bin] Error 1
2016 Mar 06
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
Or a README or something. I don't read the CHANGELOG before building, I read whatever constitutes the installation instructions. I guess I'd read an FAQ if it doesn't work (now that I think about it, rpmbuild doesn't work on the SPEC -- suppose I should report that separately). Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2016, at 13:02, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
2007 Nov 26
0
syslinux and nasm tester
Hello, Attached is the environment I've been using to test the latest syslinux and nasm, booting ISO, FDD and HDD under qemu. If anyone wants to receive the output of the daily tests, send me a private message. The README: DESCRIPTION: Script for automation of syslinux and nasm tests, using qemu and a special init that just prints "BOOTED" to the console. Images are created for
2014 Nov 25
1
[PATCH] check-gnu-efi.sh: print the output of build-gnu-efi.sh
On 11/25/2014 10:45 AM, Ady wrote: > >> The build would be failed and exit if build-gnu-efi.sh is failed, so >> we'd better not suppress the output of build-gnu-efi.sh, which is good >> for debugging. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com> >> --- >> efi/check-gnu-efi.sh | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1
2015 Feb 09
0
extlinux installer build failed
> Hi guys, > > I'm have a pure 64-bit system (Intel based). Due to that I can't use 32-bit ELF > extlinux binary provided in the syslinux-6.03 package. > > Unfortunately building extlinux installer failed... > > See error below after these command: > make bios clean > make bios (failed) > (snip) > > Is it possible to compile extlinux with
2014 Nov 25
0
[PATCH] check-gnu-efi.sh: print the output of build-gnu-efi.sh
> The build would be failed and exit if build-gnu-efi.sh is failed, so > we'd better not suppress the output of build-gnu-efi.sh, which is good > for debugging. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com> > --- > efi/check-gnu-efi.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/efi/check-gnu-efi.sh
2015 Feb 10
0
extlinux installer build failed
Alexey Orishko via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> _ I doubt Syslinux can be successfully built in a "pure 64-bit" OS, but >> I could be wrong. I have always seen some form of "multilib" or >> "lib32-glibc" or similar as a dependency.
2010 Dec 02
1
Syslinux Digest, Vol 93, Issue 1
All, Thanks for all your help. Now, I can compile the latest source code base on RedHat 5.5 after update nasm(to 2.09) and binutil(2.17). And *make spotless* before *make* under core/ directory. But with the new pxelinux.0, the PXEClient can not bootup. The error info, No valid file system found! And stuck in there. I think maybe the gcc cause the problem. My gcc version is 4.1.2. Thanks aaron
2008 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm
I made some researches how llvm, possibly with other tools, can be a full backend for compiler writers (with the final result being an executable file or dynamic linked library). Here are the results: A. Assemblers When I saw that the I86 target for llvm with the Intel syntax targets MASM (I tested with the MASM version from http://www.masm32.com/ ), it was a bad surprise for me. This is
2012 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] ASM appears to be incorrect from llc
Hi Matthew, On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Matthew Huck wrote: > Hi, > It doesn't compile with yasm, or nasm Where did you get the idea that "Intel syntax" means NASM? LLVM actually produces assembly files that can be fed to GAS, or to LLVM's MC framework. (In fact, it's missing a .intel_syntax directive so GAS knows it needs to assemble instructions according to
2015 Jun 30
2
boot... round 2
On 30.06.2015 04:27, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:20 PM, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 29.06.2015 17:06, Matthew Miller via Syslinux wrote: >> >>> >>> It actuallly looks from Adam's investigation that this isn't different >>> for this package. So, less than certainly. It looks like maybe more a
2015 Sep 23
0
Chaining to pxelinux.0 6.0.3 from iPXE - ldlinux.c32
> On 9/23/2015 12:14 AM, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > About your customers' setup... > > Are they using official binaries downloaded from kernel.org? > > Yes. Stock versions, no local modifications. > > > Which exact version of Syslinux are they using? > > I've tried versions 3.86, 4.07, 6.01, 6.03. > We can only generally use 4.07 or less
2012 Apr 02
1
[LLVMdev] Adding a Yasm ASM printer
Hi, I'm in the process of adding a X86 ASM Printer for outputting the asm in a style that Yasm can take without any post processing. Yasm's format is very close to that of intel. I was wondering if my approach is correct: I've made a custom MCAsmStreamer to remove some of the COFF symbol directives that yasm doesn't understand. I've made a X86YasmInstPrinter, and added it
2016 Mar 08
1
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:21 AM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On 03/06/16 10:02, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> >> 1_ The NEWS file would not be an adequate place to post such >> information, for several reasons. >> >> 2_ Expressing the problem with NASM in such a way would be very >> inaccurate. The problem is in NASM
2015 Feb 09
2
extlinux installer build failed
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > _ I doubt Syslinux can be successfully built in a "pure 64-bit" OS, but > I could be wrong. I have always seen some form of "multilib" or > "lib32-glibc" or similar as a dependency. If you succeed in building > Syslinux in a "pure 64-bit" OS, please let us
2009 Jun 09
0
SYSLINUX 3.82 released
Hi everyone, I have pushed out Syslinux 3.82 to the usual places. Again, special thanks to my employer, Intel, for letting me spend time working on this stuff ;) -hpa Syslinux 3.82 is a bug fix release for 3.81. Changes in 3.82: * isohybrid: fix the -partok logic for loading from a partition. * ISOLINUX: deal with systems which return from INT 13h with interrupts
2015 Feb 09
1
extlinux installer build failed
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:21:58 -0500 Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Alexey Orishko via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm have a pure 64-bit system (Intel based). Due to that I can't > > use 32-bit ELF extlinux binary provided in the syslinux-6.03 > >
2012 Apr 11
1
[LLVMdev] Yasm ASM printer
Hi, I've finally got my Yasm instruction printer sorted, and I was wondering if it is something the community would want? With it, it means you can take LLVM IR and generate a .S that can be assembled using Yasm to a window's OBJ for inclusion in normal DevStudio projects. The change set isn't large, but I am unsure of the repercussions of the changes I made. Cheers Matthew
2009 May 29
2
Syslinux 3.81 released
Hi everyone, I have pushed out Syslinux 3.81 to the usual places. Again, special thanks to my employer, Intel, for letting me spend time working on this stuff ;) -hpa Syslinux 3.81 is primarily a bug fix release. The main new features are halt-on-idle support and some features to isohybrid, including the ability to boot from an image written to a partition. Changes in 3.81: *