similar to: Syslinux Aarch64 porting

> > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:05:17 +1000 > From: Michael Davies <nemykal at nrv-linux.io> > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: [syslinux] Syslinux Aarch64 porting > Message-ID: <05476825-bf5e-9898-4aaa-3eaa927bbd0c at nrv-linux.io> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Hi, > > Is there any information available on porting

Michael Davies wrote: >Is there any information available on porting Syslinux to 64bit ARM? > >Specifically, I have a Cavium ThunderX board (Gigabyte R120-T30) which >boots using UEFI - b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5864#ov > >I'd be very interested in getting this to work, as currently the only >option for booting on this platform is Grub 2 or EFI

Hi Steve, I don't know if syslinux is x86-only by design, or just by circumstance. Simply put, I like syslinux because it's simple and it works. I know that once I get it working, I can just edit a config file and put kernels/initrds in the right place. Grub2 is trash[1], and UEFI is awkward and uncomfortable to actually use - in that I have to currently have my kernel and initrd on

I recently got a tegra TK1 and was curious how fast it was compared to my previous arm "build machine": the original arm Samsung chromebook. I timed running ninja to build just llvm in Release+Asserts using clang as the host compiler. chromebook: real 84m30.939s user 163m50.145s sys 4m0.100s TK1: real 34m7.376s user 132m44.417s sys 3m3.543s A really nice

Hello, I would like to know which ARM processors does CentOS support? Does it support Freescale/NXP? Thanks and regards Jay

Just wondering if anyone else has managed to successfully compile spandsp-0.0.2pre6... I'm assuming it is working for most people, else it probably wouldn't have been released, and/or, other people would have had more to say about it... In any case, these are the errors I am getting while doing a make: if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I -g -O2 -MT

Trying to boot my Thinkpad T30 with Solaris snv_81 xVM it get the error message This version of Solaris xVM does not support this hardware The output of "echo ::interrupts | mdb -k" while booted without xVM is bash-3.2# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k IRQ Vector IPL(lo/hi) Bus Share ISR(s) 0 0x20 14/14 - 1 cbe_fire 1 0x21 5/5 ISA 1 i8042_intr 3 0x23

I guess that in this case, what I would like to know is a reasonable upper bound of the cache line size on the target architecture. Something that I can align my data structures on at compile time so as to minimize the odds of false sharing. Think std::hardware_destructive_interference_size in C++17. Le 11/03/2017 à 13:16, Bruce Hoult a écrit : > There's no way to know, until you run

On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: >> >> # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx

I've installed 6.4 on an old T30 ThinkPad, and I'm in the midst of setting it up. I can't seem to get an rpm of Pan for it, nor even to do yum update. Mousing around fedoraproject eventually got me to http:// rpmfusion.org/Configuration/ and from there to downloads for the free, nonfree, and epel packages (along with a caveat that tells you -- *after* you've gotten rpmfusion

Hi Martin Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor

Thank you VERY much, Roger, for your detailed explanations. I'm going to choose to heed your warning. > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Jeff Bowman wrote: > > > 1. CLI error: I get an error when running ?upsdrvctl start?: ?Can't > > claim USB device [051d:0003]: libusb0-dll:err [claim_interface] could not > claim interface 0, win error: The requested resource is in use.? The

I'm investigating the build out of a Push to Talk server with multiple subscribers as part of a mobile app. Has anyone seen this usecase with Icecast? Any suggestions or places to look. Thanks, *Orion Jensen* CEO | ClearLaunch 1408 East 13th Street | Austin, TX 78702 Skype: orion.jensen | Mobile: 1.512.270.3976 orionjensen at ClearLaunch.com <peyton at clearlaunch.com> |

Hi, all. I'm getting a lot of [Feb 3 13:56:36] WARNING[3721] /usr/src/asterisk/spandsp/agx-ast-addons/app_rxfax.c: Channel T30 DONE < 0. in my log file, and incomplete fax reception. Any idea what might be going on? I've googled a fair bit, but haven't seen anything leap out at me. Thanks, -Ken

Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add

Hi, all. I've got app_rxfax going and nicely receiving a fax, which I then throw to a script, and have it convert it to a PDF and mail it. Works great... a lot of the time. But a fair bit of the time, rxfax throws errors, and extensions.conf seems never to invoke my script. Here are the pertinent lines: exten => _6403,n,rxfax(${FAXFILE}) exten =>

Hi On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the package versions of libvirt-bin are identical: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1. /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml files are

Dear All, I'm integrating avaya commuication manager difinity ver 1.0 with asterisk using B2B E1. following are the details of my H/W, zaptel configs and software installed. Digium TE110p asterisk 1.2.19 cent OS 4.4 zaptel 1.2.18 libpri 1.2.4 etc/zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,cas,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 when i ztcfg -vvv im having this error message and the E1 is not getting up. "cas

While running a multiple VM testscase with each VM running iperf traffic between others the following kernel NULL pointer exception was seen. Race appears when the tun driver instance of one VM calls skb_array_produce (from tun_net_xmit) and the the destined VM's skb_array_consume (from tun_ring_recv), which could run concurrently on another core. Due to which the sock_wfree gets called again

While running a multiple VM testscase with each VM running iperf traffic between others the following kernel NULL pointer exception was seen. Race appears when the tun driver instance of one VM calls skb_array_produce (from tun_net_xmit) and the the destined VM's skb_array_consume (from tun_ring_recv), which could run concurrently on another core. Due to which the sock_wfree gets called again