similar to: Confusion regarding cpu-arch values for EFI ByteCode and 64-bit

Ady, There are at least 3 ways to set up your DHCP server to differentiate between std DHCP, BIOS PXE and UEFI PXE. Option 93 (arch) is one way. In ISC syntax, here's 3 ways: 1. Match on VCI class "pxe-clients" { match if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9) = "PXEClient"; set vendor-string = substring ( option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9);

Currently, the TFTP configuration file discovery process will request a set of files based on the UUID, MAC address, lease IP address and eventually fall back to "default": /mybootdir/pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d /mybootdir/pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-dd /mybootdir/pxelinux.cfg/C000025B [...] /mybootdir/pxelinux.cfg/C /mybootdir/pxelinux.cfg/default

Machine is an internal server with zero need to provide or receive ip addresses using dhcp (all IPs are hard coded). Question: how do I disable dhcpv6-client on this box? [user at boxname user]# firewall-cmd --list-all public (active) target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: enp2s0 sources: services: cockpit dhcpv6-client http https ssh ports: protocols: masquerade:

This is slightly off-topic for the Syslinux mailing list, but I think it is still pertinent and it might be helpful anyway. I am confused about some conflicting information regarding DHCP option 93, Architecture Type. The UEFI specification v.2.4 Errata B, Table 179, "PXE Tag Definitions for EFI", makes reference to a table in:

So, I'm seeing a bunch of DHCPv6 traffic coming from my CentOS7 machines. Basically, the machines are trying to send router solicitations, the packets are blocked at their egress firewalls, and I get to see the logs. I don't wish to disable IPv6. I don't wish to statically configure IPv6 at this time. I wish to have the machines no longer attempting to send router solicitations as

On 08/27/2015 03:29 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 05:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening >> services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: >> >> dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos >> >> Here is the list of services: >> >> RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula

Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos Here is the list of services: RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula bacula-client dhcp dhcpv6 dhcpv6-client dns ftp high-availability http https imaps ipp ipp-client ipsec kerberos kpasswd ldap ldaps libvirt libvirt-tls mdns mountd

On 02/14/2017 08:40 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Well CentOS 7 doesn't use that, and trying to figure out where in the > mess of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts the problem is occurring has > caused me much frustration. DHCPv6 is really unusual. IPv6 addressing and routing is set up almost entirely in the kernel, unless you're using static addresses. IPv6 is neither harder

On 27/08/15 13:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service Now here's a funny thing, I was searching the samba wiki for 'firewall' and found there

Progress... On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service > now, i'm not "pro" systemd or con systemd, i use it but i set my

my named.conf look like dlz "foo" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; }; Am 07.02.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:04:30 +0100 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Windows-IP-Konfiguration >> >> >> >>

Are your running more domains on this samba server, this is the primary domain? tplk.loc ? The settings below looks good, you can try setting ipv4 preffered over ipv6 ( or disable ipv6) You can try also it with a fixed primary dns suffix. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc786695(v=ws.10).aspx 1.Open the Network Connections folder and view available connections. 2.Right-click the

Windows-IP-Konfiguration Hostname . . . . . . . . . . . . : wks-1080 Prim„res DNS-Suffix . . . . . . . : foo Knotentyp . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP-Routing aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein WINS-Proxy aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein DNS-Suffixsuchliste . . . . . . . : foo Ethernet-Adapter Ethernet 2: Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: Beschreibung. . . . . .

Hi, I work for SUN Microsystems and I have a customer running samba 2.05a under solaris 2.6. SMB status gives: route did not create the semaphore failed to initialise share modes Cant initialise shared memory - exiting Daemon is still running Did a test parm - this seems to indicate configuration is OK. Same config running on another similarly setup machine , which works fine. Any

Is there an DHCPv6 client in CentOS that supports prefix delegation correctly? The old version of dhclient can't set a requested prefix delegation length, so isn't very useful, and I can't get the even-older wide-dhcpv6 from EPEL to work. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Oh, this really helps. See below, though. On 08/27/2015 09:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 14:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress... >> >> On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>> After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. >>> >>> I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) >>>

So after digging deep and looking into my /var/log/messages for dns and recognizing that my providers internet dns not work correctly: Mar 16 07:49:48 s4slave named-sdb[15870]: error (connection refused) resolving 'ns2.allowsread.com/AAAA/IN': 192.52.178.30#53 Mar 16 07:49:50 s4slave named-sdb[15870]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'ns2.allowsread.com/AAAA/IN':

mDNS is not DNS mDNS (zeroconf/avahi) ( used for .local and .lan reserved tlds ) is an apple thingy.. mDNS udp 5353 DNS tcp/udp 53. Yes, dns tcp + udp. If and dns udp package is to large it switches to tcp. got that from wiets ( the postfix developer ) So i must believe him.. wiets is great.. ( and dutch ) :-)) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba

hello, can i authenticate samba to pam and then ldap? thank you. --David Weise OIT Rider University "The real race is not on the hot, paved road, the torturous off-road course or the smooth-surface velodrome. It is in the electrochemical pathways of your mind."--Alexi Grewal

running Version 3.6.23-14.el6_6 I'm having slow save times with folders names ~something.. ie. /www/~bin/content.txt. doing this via a windows share.. when I save file it has a moment (few seconds) of hesitation.. then saves. When I do /www/bin/content.txt. the file saves instantly. Is there anywhere I can change a setting to fix this? or is this a bug. I've looked in the logs