similar to: 6.04-pre1 DOS-based installer fails

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "6.04-pre1 DOS-based installer fails"

2014 May 24
0
Syslinux DOS-based installer in FreeDOS
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > Testing the DOS-based Syslinux installer, syslinux.com, with the "-m" > parameter, I found that it works as expected under MS-DOS and its DOS > variants, but it seems to fail under FreeDOS (please correct me if > I'm wrong). This sounds like either a bug in FreeDOS or another undesirable negative
2014 May 24
2
Syslinux DOS-based installer in FreeDOS
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Testing the DOS-based Syslinux installer, syslinux.com, with the "-m" > > parameter, I found that it works as expected under MS-DOS and its DOS > > variants, but it seems to fail under FreeDOS (please correct me if > > I'm wrong). > > This sounds like either a bug in
2014 May 23
2
Syslinux DOS-based installer in FreeDOS
Testing the DOS-based Syslinux installer, syslinux.com, with the "-m" parameter, I found that it works as expected under MS-DOS and its DOS variants, but it seems to fail under FreeDOS (please correct me if I'm wrong). Using FreeDOS kernel v.2041 (386f32), Syslinux v.6.03-pre11 and either FAT16 or FAT32 partitions, executing: syslinux.com -m -i c: or: syslinux.com -f -m -i
2016 Mar 05
2
build problems with 6.04-pre1
hello everybody, apologies if I'm missing something here Just tried to build 6.04-pre1 test version with: make bios installer and found some problems all (seemingly) related to inaccurate paths in various Makefiles. I enclose a complete patch at the end of this email, which details the problems I found and how they got fixed for me. As an example, this is the first error I got:
2014 May 30
2
Syslinux DOS-based installer in FreeDOS
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 05/24/2014 01:58 PM, Ady wrote: > > > > My guess is that if this was a bug in FreeDOS (as in "something" that > > has nothing to do with the syslinux.com command) then it would be > > somehow triggered by other DOS programs trying to write to the MBR. > > Considering
2016 Mar 06
3
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
... > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ > -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ > -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ >
2014 May 25
0
Syslinux DOS-based installer in FreeDOS
On 05/24/2014 01:58 PM, Ady wrote: > > My guess is that if this was a bug in FreeDOS (as in "something" that > has nothing to do with the syslinux.com command) then it would be > somehow triggered by other DOS programs trying to write to the MBR. > Considering that there are several (open source) DOS programs that > are capable of successfully writing to the MBR
2016 Mar 06
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: > ... >> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >> -Di386 \ >> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm >> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \
2016 Mar 08
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On 07.03.2016 06:45, poma wrote: > On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote: >> On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: >>> ... >>>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >>>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >>>> -Di386 \ >>>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >>>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD
2016 Mar 07
2
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote: > On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: >> ... >>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >>> -Di386 \ >>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm >>>
2016 Mar 06
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
Or a README or something. I don't read the CHANGELOG before building, I read whatever constitutes the installation instructions. I guess I'd read an FAQ if it doesn't work (now that I think about it, rpmbuild doesn't work on the SPEC -- suppose I should report that separately). Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2016, at 13:02, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
2019 May 22
2
lpxelinux.0 issues with larger initrd.img files from RHEL >= 7.5 on UCS servers?
Hello Ady, thanks for getting back to me. On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:33:50AM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > Is there something I could do > > A_ Instead of 6.03, try 6.04-pre1 (not pre2 and not pre3, but pre1). > Please remember to change _all_ related files to the same version, not > just lpxelinux.0. > > Alternatively (and in many cases, even better) you
2016 Mar 06
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On 05.03.2016 14:43, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > After so much time and improvements, I'm glad to see and publicize a > pre-release, 6.04-pre1 in > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ > > Personally, I've already been working testing the pre-release as-is > and my tests have been positive so far. I appreciate feedback like > that
2016 Mar 06
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
I am excited to try this on my system that hangs with 6.03. Is this the best place to report if it continues not to work? Thanks for all of this work! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 5, 2016, at 08:43, Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > After so much time and improvements, I'm glad to see and publicize a > pre-release, 6.04-pre1 in >
2016 Mar 06
4
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
> > Emphasize proper NASM versions. > > --- > NEWS | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > index d1a5b2c..7848c6b 100644 > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ Starting with 1.47, changes marked with SYSLINUX, PXELINUX, ISOLINUX > or EXTLINUX apply to that specific program only; other changes apply > to all
2019 Aug 16
2
Question on upgrading to syslinux 6.04?
On 16 Aug 2019 at 5:40, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: To: "syslinux at zytor.com" <syslinux at zytor.com> Date sent: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 05:40:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [syslinux] Question on upgrading to syslinux 6.04? From: Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> Send reply to: Ady Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> > > I've
2016 Mar 05
11
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
After so much time and improvements, I'm glad to see and publicize a pre-release, 6.04-pre1 in https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ Personally, I've already been working testing the pre-release as-is and my tests have been positive so far. I appreciate feedback like that from Gabriele Balducci and testing "make bios installer". Yes, there are a
2019 Apr 16
1
EFI32, EFI64 on one disk
Hello, Thank you, for this information. This is, what I need. So I will switch from 6.03 to the last 6.04 pre. Regards Johann > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Syslinux <syslinux-bounces at syslinux.org> Im Auftrag von Ady Ady via > Syslinux > Gesendet: Montag, 15. April 2019 18:53 > An: syslinux at syslinux.org > Betreff: Re: [syslinux] EFI32, EFI64 on one
2016 Mar 08
0
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 03/08/2016 02:53 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> Poma, in my opinion, this behavior means it's your/Fedora's responsibility >> to propose a change that distinguishes between broken and working NASM >> 2.11.06 or revert the commit in your/Fedora's build. >> > > Yes, it
2016 Oct 26
2
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
> >> Let me double check what the status of 6.04-pre1 is. Maybe this patch > >> is not necessary at all! > > OK, I have verified beyond doubt that 6.04-pre1 (prebuilt from > kernel.org) indeed does fix the issue on the affected systems. > > Again, sorry for the churn! > > Best Regards, > - Chris OK, so, from the user's point of view, the