similar to: mixed email threads

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:28:47PM +0000, Patrick Masotta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:15:10PM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > > Your first email about your efi/udp.c patch seems to be part of another > > email thread, and not a separate email thread as it was supposed to be. > > > > See > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2016-February/thread.html#24866

> In my inbox all the headers look OK, > I do not see what you guys say... > Probably some Yahoo quirk? > > > Best, > Patrick Your first email about your efi/udp.c patch seems to be part of another email thread, and not a separate email thread as it was supposed to be. See http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2016-February/thread.html#24866 and scroll up. Regards, Ady.

In my inbox all the headers look OK, I do not see what you guys say... Probably some Yahoo quirk? Best, Patrick ----- Original Message ----- From: Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> To: syslinux at zytor.com Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:57 AM Subject: [syslinux] mixed email threads > > It is the very same thread, > so is this about UEFI UDP/TFTP or ntfs: remove

I see it now, well I have no idea why that happen As you said, I might've taken an e-mail from the list and replied erasing the old text; probably some unseen left over made the mistake. Sorry. Best, Patrick ----- Original Message ----- From: Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> To: syslinux at zytor.com Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [syslinux] mixed

Hi, My problem is I have a particular system which has Linux (LFS) and Windows XP on one drive and Windows 10 on a second drive. I use extlinux to boot my systems and all three systems boot as expected, however in use I have found unsatisfactory interactions between the Windows XP and the Windows 10 systems. My question is: Is it possible on booting one of the Windows systems to hide

ACE issued following PR: http://www.ace.nl/news/aces-cosy-compiler-framework-outperforms-llvm-arm9-processor Weird that they don't give any number and use ARM 9, do they mean cortex-a9 ?

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

Hi.... >From within Windows 7 NTFS I would like if possible to be able to do either of the following: * Force Windows 7 to reboot into a PXE boot from a TFTP server using a specific PXE/TFTP config file OR * Force Windows 7 to reboot and load a linux kernel from the NTFS partition. This kernel would then use an NFS root filesystem. All of my testing is being done on a Windows 7 NTFS

Dear Christian, Thanks for your feedback. The HDD will not accept larger than 4GB (as its in FAT format). Its a new external HDD. Thinking of the best format(that would work with Mac , Win and Linux) .seems like a challenge. What's your view on NTFS? And why not exFAT? Thanks Kevin On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: > > > Am 08.

Hi, I have successfully installed Debian using PXE boot and the local tftp server of Qemu. To do that I grab a copy of netboot.tar.gz for the amd64 architecture from the debian website for Buster (10.1), extracted it then recreate the symlink found: - mklink ldlinux.c32 debian-installer\amd64\boot-screens\ldlinux.c32 - mklink pxelinux.0 debian-installer\amd64\pxelinux.0 - mklink /D pxelinux.cfg

Hi, In the aftermath of the signing key expiring a couple of days ago, it seems that the Ubuntu repositories are no longer signed (there is no Release.gpg file present). This is not a good situation as users cannot verify the packages' origin. I hope this will be fixed promptly :-) Thank you, Mikko Pesari

> > All of my testing is being done on a Windows 7 NTFS virtual machine ins > ESXi 5.5 and I am using syslinux 6.02. I have tried the following on my > Win7 NTFS C: drive: > > * mkdir c:\syslinux > * run 'syslinux.exe --force --mbr --active --directory /syslinux/ --install > C:' This works and I can see 2 hidden files ldlinux.sys and ldlinux.c32 in >

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:14:36AM +0100, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > diff U3 syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c > > --- syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c Mon Oct 06 16:27:44 2014 > > +++ syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c Fri Nov 13 02:29:56 2015 > > patch seen >

So there seem to be some shortcomings in NTFS, still. 1. Symlinks are not supported. Proper symlinks exist in NTFS since Vista, so we should support them. 2. readdir() seems to be broken. I have been using the following test load to generate disk images: http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/syslinux/exttest-20140521.tar.xz Anyone who has been involved with the NTFS code who has a chance to take a

Hi Railers If you are in the Copenhagen area on the 29th of this month (that''s a Thursday) Jesper and I would be glad to see you at Caf? Selina in the central Copenhagen for the first of many Ruby on Rails meetups. We start at 20:30 hours and have of cause arranged for free beer and complementary WiFi. Our goal is to create an inspiring atmosphere where railers (new and old) can

Sure, and thanks for trying to help! These are the two correct answers when SNI is included. The certificates are fully chained. Both certificates carry the same subject mail.cs.sbg.ac.at but differ in Subject Alternative Name (SAN). X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:? ? DNS:mail.cs.sbg.ac.at, DNS:smtp.cs.sbg.ac.at, DNS:imap.cs.sbg.ac.at, DNS:pop.cs.sbg.ac.at X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:? ?

Hi, I recognised some funny behaviour on my server. IMAP clients which won't send an Server Name Indication (SNI) sometimes get the wrong certificate. I would expect that those clients always get the default certificate (of my new domain), instead in about 20 to 50% of connections the certificate of my old domain will be presented. (sample rate was 3 times 30 connections) Clients sending SNI

I've recently got a new flash drive (Kingston DT Micro 3.1 64GB) and found my existing SYSLINUX 6.02 fails to load on it, it just shows the version info and hangs forever. I've tried 6.03 as well as the latest git revision (currently 5483860), they both give me "Failed to load ldlinux.c32" The same builds and config work on my Kingston DT 101 G3 32GB. Both are formatted as NTFS

diff U3 syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c --- syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c Mon Oct 06 16:27:44 2014 +++ syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c Fri Nov 13 02:29:56 2015 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ /* * extlinux.c * - * Install the syslinux boot block on an fat, ntfs, ext2/3/4, btrfs, xfs, + * Install the syslinux boot block on a fat, ntfs, ext2/3/4, btrfs, xfs, * and ufs1/2

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Ady SF via Syslinux wrote: > [PATCH] extlinux/main.c: typo fixes > > Some typo fixes in extlinux/main.c. > None of them effects code execution. > --- > extlinux/main.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > FWIW working on a new version that is `git am` ready, it will have a "sign-off".