similar to: [patch] 6.03 extlinux/main.c typos

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:14:36AM +0100, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > diff U3 syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c > > --- syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c Mon Oct 06 16:27:44 2014 > > +++ syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c Fri Nov 13 02:29:56 2015 > > patch seen >

Spaces, ASCII 0x20, have been * moved * inserted * deleted Signed-off-by: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> --- extlinux/main.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 26eb43c..ed359f1 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -393,11 +393,11 @@ int install_bootblock(int fd,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > diff U3 syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c > --- syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c Mon Oct 06 16:27:44 2014 > +++ syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c Fri Nov 13 02:29:56 2015 > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > /* > * extlinux.c > * > - * Install the syslinux boot block on an fat, ntfs,

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Ady SF via Syslinux wrote: > [PATCH] extlinux/main.c: typo fixes > > Some typo fixes in extlinux/main.c. > None of them effects code execution. > --- > extlinux/main.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > FWIW working on a new version that is `git am` ready, it will have a "sign-off".

Some typo fixes in extlinux/main.c. None of them effects code execution. --- extlinux/main.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 6871fb1..26eb43c 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ /* * extlinux.c * - * Install the syslinux boot block on an fat, ntfs, ext2/3/4, btrfs, xfs, +

Some typo fixes in extlinux/main.c. None of them effects code execution. Signed-off-by: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> --- extlinux/main.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 6871fb1..26eb43c 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ /* * extlinux.c * - * Install

On Fri, 12 Jul, at 08:31:27PM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: > @@ -575,7 +594,7 @@ bail: > return 1; > } > > -/* btrfs has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > +/* btrfs/ufs2 has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > is not managered by btrfs tree, so actually this is not installed as files. > since the cow

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Change since v1: * Fix bug on dentry structure (thank you specification; btw, sarcasm), and consequently a bug on ufs_readdir. * Add readlink support (applied tests for symlinks whose destionation path were stored in blk pointers and the file itself). * Several improvements. Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to push the doc to the wiki as soon as the UFS support gets merged. Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 on Syslinux - (usage/install) ----- There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to contact the author who replied: "The name has always been

Hi, I found a bug in extlinux/main.c. Writing a bootloader on a file mounted via /dev/mapper in Lunix it crashed on me with a segment fault. The bug is here: if (!ioctl(devfd, HDIO_GETGEO, &geo)) { Since we are already called with geo as a pointer the & is wrong as the pointer itself will be overwritten. This works: int get_geometry(int devfd, uint64_t totalbytes, struct

Rename from ext2_fat_install_file to ext_common_install_file as it is use for ext, vfat, ntfs and ufs. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cornu <nicolac76 at yahoo.fr> --- extlinux/main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 5bab712..c446c75 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static int

There is still a duplicate line in 3.82 extlinux/main.c I had think to already have reported that but didn't find the mail again in the send box so I am now unsure. Gilles -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: syslinux-3.75-pre3_double-program.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 264 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Merge installation of ldlinux.c32 from ext2_fat_install_file, btrfs_install_file and xfs_install_file into one function ext_install_ldlinux_c32 Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cornu <nicolac76 at yahoo.fr> --- extlinux/main.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I wonder why the already built-in binaries are not enough / adequate. > Or, in other words, I am curious about why do you need to build your > own binary files, instead of using the files that are already there > in the official archives in kernel.org. I don't believe it can be used as is: bash# file

Searching threads back to 2013-07-01 (date of last message on thread), I've come up with the folloowing: -Needs review for inclusion: 12/26 Init cache once 11/27 efi PE header set 11/21 FSUUID for ext2 filesystem 10/15 Upgrade to Lua 5.2.2, add filesystem module and get_key binding (21) 09/23 com32: hdt: fix memory leak 10/3/12-12/16 4k sector support 10/18 MultiFS from MultiDisk 10/07 Lua

Hi all, I'm building extlinux on a rather limited linux system (LFS), bios version (no efi). Unfortunately, extlinux.txt does not contain any information related to build procedures and dependencies. python /sources/syslinux-6.03pre11/com32/cmenu/menugen.py --input=/sources/syslinux-6.03pre11/com32/cmenu/test2.menu --output=test2.c

Hi, I discovered a very strange situation. I have 22 systems running Fedora 21 (F21) with bundled syslinux-extlinux 6.03. On one of those systems, I am having trouble booting. This machine was upgraded from Fedora 19 (F19), so can boot either the new or the old O/S -- F19 is on one disk partitition, F21 is on another, and there's a shared /boot partition. On this one machine, when I try

On May 13, 2014 4:04 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > I wonder why the already built-in binaries are not enough / adequate. > > I don't believe it can be used as is: > > bash# file syslinux > > syslinux: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version