similar to: Open thougts about the project governance & workflow

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Erwan Velu via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been involved in Syslinux since 14 years and been almost off for many > years for multiple reasons. I'm currently trying to recover and while > observing the project with a little of distance I noticed the following : > > - project's activity is pretty

As I understood, Asterisk has a lot of features but lacks native 3-way calling and attended transfer. It would be great to have these features available to a simple IAX phone. I wonder how this could be implemented in Asterisk without asking for a patch. It should be possible with parking, conferencing, AGI and the manager interface. The extension 77 could be used by the attendant to blindly

Hello R-users, I am interested to know if there is a tool that allows us to build SAS Enterprise Miner like workflows using the R scripts. For example, let's say I have the R scripts/functions for the following tasks: 1. Data Cleaning 2. Model Building 3. Model Validation 4. Visualization I would like to drag these functions into a workflow and run them together (output of one function

Is there any project or solution for an easy integration of a WFE / WfMS into rails? I''m quite new to this topic, but I probably need a small subset of workflow patterns (or whatever the correct term is) only. Any pointers are welcome. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am relativley new to Ruby on Rails and am still in the process of enjoying the features it offers. I wanted to know if theres workflow support in rails. Can some one give me pointers if its possible. Thanks Naveen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060305/43c9abc3/attachment.html

Hi LLVM community, As discussed earlier, we in the clangd land feel that buganizer does not address the clangd's needs as a bug-tracking system. In our previous attempt to raise this on llvm-dev [1] we shared our idea to put the clangd issue tracker on GitHub. The participants raised multiple concerns, including the migration costs, whether GitHub is the right choice as an issue tracker,

Hi all, I have recently given commit access to LLVM and successfully pushed a test commit from my local master branch. However, I can’t find which is the recommended workflow for committing more serious stuff using git alone. I have read the docs but everything seems to still require svn before bridging to github. I want to use git alone to commit a patch that I got reviewed. I currently have

Let's say I have written the following tiny .Rnw file: _________________________________________ \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{Sweave} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{pgf} \begin{document} <<>>= sessionInfo() @ \end{document} _________________________________________ I then can go to R and use sweave to translate the .Rnw file into a .tex

Hi all, I've got https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756 up for review currently which simplifies a lot of the logic in our lit config files. For most people, this will be completely transparent and "just work", but it breaks one workflow that people should be aware of. Problem: If you run lit by putting llvm-config in your path and then running <source-root>/utils/lit/lit.py

Hi Hiroshi, Thanks for that. I find “rebase” difficult to use. Maybe I don’t understand it, but it always causes a lot ‘conflicts’ that are very hard to fix according to my experience. I have another question though. LLVM requires that reviewed patches are pushed as a /single/ commit with a standardised message, particularly specifying the Differential Revision url as part of the commit message.

Hi, I'm asking another one of those questions that would be obvious if I could watch your work while you do it. I'm having trouble understanding the workflow of code and package maintenance. Stage 1. Make some R functions in a folder. This is in a Subversion repo R/trunk/myproject Stage 2. Make a package: After the package.skeleton, and R check, I have a new folder with the project

Hello dear R users, Recently there has been several fascinating threads on the website stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com> regarding the subject of R WorkFlow best practices: - What best practices do you use for programming in R?<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2258092/what-best-practices-do-you-use-for-programming-in-r> - Workflow for statistical analysis and report

> On 10 Nov 2019, at 07:00, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > recipe is not correct in the absolute: the delta from master does not mean it contains exactly what you want, you seem to assume that master didn't evolve between the time "patchbranch" was created. > Hi Mehdi, I’m doing it this way to make sure that master /actually/ contains “exactly

Hi all, If you use the R Editor (not another text editor), please read on... So, my usual R workflow involves having two windows open (R Console, R Editor), writing a line of code in the R Editor and then typing Ctrl-R to run that line. Then, quite frequently, I want to run a new command to check my output (e.g., dim(dataframe) or str(dataframe) or head(dataframe)) but I *do not want* to write

Hi Mehdi, > On 10 Nov 2019, at 20:27, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > No: the arcanist command does not suffer from the problem I was raising. > The issue I was referring to is that your reset command will lead to *undoing* changes from master (unrelated to your branch) when you commit in the end (all the changes that are in master but not in

Hi all, I think I've addressed all the concerns here, and I believe there should be no immediate impact to the current workflow. with that said, I plan to commit this either later today or early tomorrow if there are no other concerns. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I tested this out, and AFAICT nothing will change. It will continue

Thank you Zach. > On Nov 6, 2017, at 13:37, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > I’m going to spend a little time seeing if i can make the change invisible to the bots so they will continue to work as they do today. Will report back after I’ve explored that a bit > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:35 PM Mike Edwards <medwards at apple.com <mailto:medwards at

+llvm-dev On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 14/01/2019 10:36, Ilya Biryukov via llvm-dev wrote: > > To reiterate, our proposal was to create a repository for each of the > > LLVM subprojects under the official LLVM GitHub account, e.g. > > github.com/llvm/clangd <http://github.com/llvm/clangd>. > >

llvm-lit is already put into <output-tree>/bin by CMake. There is a CMake target called `llvm-lit` that will generate the <output-dir>/bin/llvm-lit script. If you built only a few specific llvm targets such as FileCheck, etc then you may need to run this lit target manually. If you just run "ninja" for example, or "ninja check-llvm", it's automatically

Since it's towards the end of the day already, I'll put this in tomorrow morning around 9 or 10, to make sure I'm around to fix anything that arises (or revert). On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:53 PM Mike Edwards <medwards at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Zach, > Thanks for doing this extra work to make this lower impact for the rest of > us. Let’s give it a try and see what