similar to: Bug#793921: tftpd-hpa: IPv6 address cannonization breaks IPv4

Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason

On 07/29/2015 01:45 AM, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a > different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. > > Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and > 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, > which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also > AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to > connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to > start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is

Hello, I need help in setting up tftpd-hpa to send a kernel to a client, on a debian woody installation. I did manage the feat when using tftpd to send a kernel to a client which had a separate network interface card, but I would like to do it with integrated LAN. Trials with tftpd failed with error messages starting with 'PXE', and later I learned that tftpd-hpa is needed for the PXE

This is more a question than a serious proposal. The name of the pid file should probably be configurable, and it should be unlinked on normal termination, but no such thing exists in standalone mode. SIGTERM and SIGINT should be catched and considered normal, I guess. Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> --- tftpd/tftpd.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

I believe I have encountered a problem with tftpd-hpa very similar to the problem described in the following link: http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2003-May/001955.html We were running tftpd-hpa version 0.29 on RedHat 8.0 (on an older Dell desktop), and upgraded to tftpd-hpa version 0.42 when the problem was discovered; however, we are seeing the same thing after the upgrade. The TFTP

I cannot seem to get the remap-file function of tftpd working right. I can sucessfully place files on the server but the remap feature is not working. I look in the logfile and it has an entry in there for tftpd. remap: input: startup-config Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: remap: done Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: RRQ from 192.168.0.12 filename startup-config I think that I

If I omit --secure from the tftpd-hpa command line, I then need to e.g. `tftp -c get /var/lib/tftpboot/vmlinuz` instead of plain /vmlinuz, even though I pass /var/lib/tftpboot as the tftp dir in the tftpd-hpa command line. That essentially means that I'm exporting my whole /, which is clearly something I don't want to do. I basically want tftpd-hpa to serve files from /var/lib/tftpboot

Hello, i've got a problem on lenny with tftpd-hpa When i launch it from /etc/init.d/tftpd-hpa start, there is no pidfile created. what is the way to get it ? thank you -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Pascal Legrand *IUT de Chartres* - _Service Informatique_ --------------------------------------------------------------- 1, place Roger Joly 28000 Chartres

Hello all, Tested on linux 2.6.18 (Centos5) and FreeBSD 7.0. You would execute it like below (which basically makes tftp reply back with same port is listening on ) tftpd --port-range 69:69 -4 -s /tftpboot/ --- tftp-hpa-0.49/tftpd/tftpd.c 2008-10-21 01:08:31.000000000 +0300 +++ tftp-hpa-0.49-tftpd-reuseport.c 2010-03-03 15:19:26.000000000 +0200 @@ -524,6 +524,11 @@ #ifndef __CYGWIN__

On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 11:25 -0500, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary > OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from > inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work > okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c has a 'while (1)' loop that > has

Op 2013-08-26 om 09:35 schreef John McDonnell: > On Behalf Of Geert Stappers > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 6:42 AM > > > > On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests > > in logfiles. > > > > On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', > > but no logging. At least I can't find it them in

Hello, On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog logging. At least I can't find it them in /var/log/*/* Where does tftpd-hpa writes it's logging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

Hi I'm working on an update of the openbsd tftpd, mainly to support RFC 2349 (tsize option; and 2347-2348 too). In fact, i backport from tftp-hpa (which came from an old openbsd cvs). I know, i can use tftp-hpa but first it doesn't compile on openbsd, second, i hope the backport could be include in openbsd cvs ... does someone know a tftp client or a test to really know what is good or

Hi, I have a weirdness with tftpd-hpa, it seems to report a wrong date in the syslog (2 hours early): root at sup01 > tail -f /var/log/syslog Oct 16 11:26:52 sup01 last message repeated 11 times Oct 16 11:28:06 sup01 ucd-snmp[425]: Connection from 62.210.191.157 Oct 16 09:28:33 sup01 in.tftpd[14495]: RRQ from 10.8.1.222 filename update.cfg Oct 16 11:30:01 sup01 /USR/SBIN/CRON[14521]: (root)

Hello, I have tried setting umask 0027 for tftpd, so files are created with permissions 0640. However, tftpd-hpa refused uploading a file with error "must have global write permissions". Looking at the source, I could avoid this issue by using "-p" option. However, it also seems that the umask is not applied when the "-p" option is used. Can anyone explain this

It seems that tftpd-hpa is more suitable at serving arbitrarily large files (greater than 65535 blocks long; with pxelinux.0 using a default block size of 1408 this is 92,273,280 bytes) as atftpd will complain in the log stating "Requested file to big, increase BLKSIZE". I saw that a while back HPA mentioned that atftpd was probably more scalable (number of clients) while tftpd-hpa is

> -----Original Message----- > On Behalf Of Geert Stappers > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 6:42 AM > Subject: [syslinux] logging location of tftpd-hpa > > On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. > > On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog > logging. At least I can't find it them in

On 01/30/2014 11:09 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > Yeah, I get this part. I think I misunderstood what xinetd was doing - I > thought it was waiting for tftpd parent to exit and not processing > anything else. So xinetd is ignoring tftp port during this sequence, and > any new requests come in and are serviced by the parent tftpd which spawns > new tftpd children to do the