similar to: 2019 년 9 월 ~ 10 월의 SOA

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/attachments/20191022/68f8110d/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SOA_AUGUST_SEPTEMBER.doc Type: application/msword Size: 534410 bytes Desc: not available URL:

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/attachments/20191112/cca5410e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SOA_OCTOBER_NOVEMBER.zip Type: application/zip Size: 798 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/attachments/20191112/cca5410e/attachment.zip>

On 27/05/2019 09:12, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: > Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : >> On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >>> on 7 AD sites. >>> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated

Hi, We have outdated SOA information in our samba DNS. We used to have a DC1, and it is no more, however it's listed in our SOA records on both remaining DC's. I think this is not correct. I am under the impression that in order to get full failover support, all DC's need to have listed themselves as SOA. This is also what google tells me:

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:21:52 +0100 "Rauer, Frank via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hello list..:-) > > i have a little problem and don´t find a solution for it. > Some time ago our first DC died and I replaced it with a new one with > a different name but the same IP.didn´t want to change the DNS entry > in all the clients. > Guess since

Hi. I'm running Sernet Samba 4.7 on Ubuntu 16. I noticed that when my first DC went away, I had problems. The SOA record for the domain still points at that first DC. I found, in this entry from 2014 ( https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-August/184301.html) that "Windows AD servers actually 'lie' about the SOA record, and always say that it points to themselves. So in a

Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : > On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >> on 7 AD sites. >> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated >> to the last DC that was joined to the domain. >> But this DC is

Hi Rowland, I followed this page "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record" more than once. Everything in here is fine...every test successful. My problem is that the existing SAO record is pointing to dc1.samdom.example.com which doesn´t exist anymore. Now it must be dc01.samdom.example.com. What happens when I try to add ... samba-tool dns add

I''ve been asked to look into Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) before we embark on a major re-development (in Ruby on Rails). Can anyone point me to any resources about SOA in combination with Rails ? Concrete examples of how SOA was applied to a particular problem would be very welcome. My investigations so far lead me to believe that SOA is really about gluing together

Hello list..:-) i have a little problem and don´t find a solution for it. Some time ago our first DC died and I replaced it with a new one with a different name but the same IP.didn´t want to change the DNS entry in all the clients. Guess since than the dynamic DNS update wasn´t working anymore, so I tried to find out the reason. What I found is that the SOA record was pointing still to the

[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=3, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=hostmaster.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) NS:

Hello, I have the very same problem, does anybody know a way? I am thinking of converting to BIND, modifying and then converting it back to Internal DNS implementation. >>>> Hello. How could one modify a SOA record in rc3? For example, NS part (not NS record) of SOA record points to an absent Windows server. This effectively breaks DNS updates, since there is no such server and if

Aaaaaaand more problems... Welcome to the continuing saga of FILER. It appears that neither SOA or NS records were updated during the process of moving fsmo roles to CBADC01. SOA entries on all three active DCs point to FILER. There aren't any NS records for any of the new DCs, only FILER. In RSAT each DNS server's properties show filer.cb.cliffbells.com is the primary server. This

Hi I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located on 7 AD sites. I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated to the last DC that was joined to the domain. But this DC is located on one of the remote sites. Is this behavior normal or would it be better if I updated this record via "samba-tool dns update" to point it to one of my 3 main

Hi, How can the SOA record of a domain be changed? I need to decrease expire and minttl Thanks. -- P?ter Varkoly Greuleinweg 37. D-90411 N?rnberg

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist Here's a new rule for ignore.d.server/bind: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: (client [.#[:digit:]]+: )?notify question section contains no SOA$ This is apparently triggered by DJB's DNS survey (<http://cr.yp.to/surveys/dns1.html>, packet #5). It doesn't show up too often (I've seen it

Hi, How to update register SOA in samba 4.1rc4 ? Thanks!. Jac? Ramos -- *"O homem n?o foi criado para ser feliz nem para vencer, mas para viver para Deus. Quando vive para Deus ? feliz e vence." Isaltino Gomes * * $whoami* - Perito Forense Computacional - Pentester - Esp. em Seguran?a de Redes de Computadores com enf?se a Per?cia Forense Computacional - FACID -

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:58:55PM +0200, D Grealish via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We have an issue where an existing Win 10 client is already part of the > domain, however it's DNS entry isn't updated, > Is this bug related? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 > > please see details below > > Ubuntu: 16.04.01 LTS > Samba: Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu

Hi, We have an issue where an existing Win 10 client is already part of the domain, however it's DNS entry isn't updated, Is this bug related? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 please see details below Ubuntu: 16.04.01 LTS Samba: Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu Samba Internal DNS 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' is not specified >ipconfig /registerdns Samba-Log: sudo