Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "eFax message from "unknown" - 2 page(s), Caller-ID: 44 151-268-0235"
2015 Feb 25
0
eFax message from "POTS modem 2 " - 1 page(s), Caller-ID: 1-630-226-2563
[1]
JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached
or LOGIN HERE [6].
FAX DETAILS
Caller Id:
Received:
Type:
Number of pages:
Reference #:
1-630-226-2563 [7]
2015-02-24 16:40:51 CST
Attached in pdf
1
pdx_did4-056267093-45815523543-99
WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN:
*
2015 Mar 13
0
eFax message from "unknown" - 1 page(s), Caller-ID: 1-314-427-3300
[1]
JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached
or LOGIN HERE [6].
FAX DETAILS
Caller Id:
Received:
Type:
Number of pages:
Reference #:
1-314-427-3300 [7]
2015-03-13 05:29:26 CDT
Attached in pdf
1
atl_did9-1426242519-18479294585-167
WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN:
*
2005 Jun 03
0
issues installing efax application from efax.com
I used to be able to install the efax application from efax.com but
it seems to hang now when I click the first "Next" button. cpu is
spiked and just continues to run endlessly until I kill it.
Here's the debug information if anyone can help...
Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin msgrplus.exe ...
warn:ntdll:NtCreateFile L"\\??\\C:" not found (c0000034)
2006 Jan 18
1
Iaxmodem and Efax?
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060118/cbc5089c/attachment.pgp
2007 May 02
0
CESA-2007:0235 Low CentOS 4 ia64 util-linux - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text
2007 May 04
0
CESA-2007:0235 Low CentOS 4 s390(x) util-linux - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.s390x.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently
2008 Apr 20
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm
speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm
speex-devel-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm
src:
speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2008 Apr 20
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 i386 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
i386:
speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm
speex-devel-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm
src:
speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 CentOS 5 x86_64 speex Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
492528b48a9d807e5209bc403d477581 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
c86fba70e91cc69a2f6e82b06e59a6c5 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.x86_64.rpm
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 CentOS 5 i386 speex Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
47a276d96c56eea2c25eb3839abd4f57 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
ff9e4b595acef523f9e31193739488ca speex-devel-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
Source:
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 ia64 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/speex-devel-1.0.4-4.c4.1.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
--------------
2008 Apr 22
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/speex-devel-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390x.rpm
2007 Nov 30
1
Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
I finally picked up a "real" modem (not a winmodem) and put it in my
machine. I pulled down the hsfmodem driver from the source, got a license
and installed the driver at full power.
If I use wvdial, I can get out through the modem, so I know that works.
However, sendfax is rejecting the fax capability (from
/var/log/sendfax.log):
11/30 00:31:52 sendfax: interim release 1.1.33-Apr10
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>
<SNIP>
>
> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>
upstream references:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-0235
Note that in the openwall.com URL you provided
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment:
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 &
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
> > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
> >>
>
2005 Aug 03
0
fax <--> grandstream 286 <--> asterisk <--> pstn
Hi all,
Im having problems using a fax machine conected trough a grandstream
286 sip ATA, it must be able to send and recive fax from pstn, but fax
always ends with communication errors 252/244/232 and others.
Im using alaw/ulaw codes on pass trough mode, also have tried asterisk
faxdetection, nvfaxdetect, disable echo cancellation by hand always
with same results.
Grandstream ATA is using
2015 Jan 28
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Banton" <centos at web.org.uk>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
>
> Hi,
>
> For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an
> obligation to look after
2015 Jan 27
3
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Saw this on the Exim List:-
From: Tony Finch <dot--at-- at dotat.at>
Subject: [exim] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname remotely exploitable
via exim
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:33:45 +0000
"The Exim mail server is exploitable remotely if configured to perform
extra security checks on the HELO and EHLO commands ("helo_verify_hosts"
or "helo_try_verify_hosts"
2015 Jan 27
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>>
>>> <SNIP>
>>>>
>>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 -
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>
>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>>>
>>
>> upstream references: