similar to: eFax message from "unknown" - 2 page(s), Caller-ID: 44 151-268-0235

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "eFax message from "unknown" - 2 page(s), Caller-ID: 44 151-268-0235"

2015 Feb 25
0
eFax message from "POTS modem 2 " - 1 page(s), Caller-ID: 1-630-226-2563
[1] JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY [2] [3] [4] [5] You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached or LOGIN HERE [6]. FAX DETAILS Caller Id: Received: Type: Number of pages: Reference #: 1-630-226-2563 [7] 2015-02-24 16:40:51 CST Attached in pdf 1 pdx_did4-056267093-45815523543-99 WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN: *
2015 Mar 13
0
eFax message from "unknown" - 1 page(s), Caller-ID: 1-314-427-3300
[1] JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY [2] [3] [4] [5] You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached or LOGIN HERE [6]. FAX DETAILS Caller Id: Received: Type: Number of pages: Reference #: 1-314-427-3300 [7] 2015-03-13 05:29:26 CDT Attached in pdf 1 atl_did9-1426242519-18479294585-167 WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN: *
2005 Jun 03
0
issues installing efax application from efax.com
I used to be able to install the efax application from efax.com but it seems to hang now when I click the first "Next" button. cpu is spiked and just continues to run endlessly until I kill it. Here's the debug information if anyone can help... Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin msgrplus.exe ... warn:ntdll:NtCreateFile L"\\??\\C:" not found (c0000034)
2006 Jan 18
1
Iaxmodem and Efax?
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060118/cbc5089c/attachment.pgp
2007 May 02
0
CESA-2007:0235 Low CentOS 4 ia64 util-linux - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text
2007 May 04
0
CESA-2007:0235 Low CentOS 4 s390(x) util-linux - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/util-linux-2.12a-16.EL4.25.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently
2008 Apr 20
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm speex-devel-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm src: speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment
2008 Apr 20
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 i386 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm speex-devel-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.i386.rpm src: speex-1.0.4-4.el4_6.1.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 CentOS 5 x86_64 speex Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 492528b48a9d807e5209bc403d477581 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm c86fba70e91cc69a2f6e82b06e59a6c5 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.x86_64.rpm
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 CentOS 5 i386 speex Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 47a276d96c56eea2c25eb3839abd4f57 speex-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm ff9e4b595acef523f9e31193739488ca speex-devel-1.0.5-4.el5_1.1.i386.rpm Source:
2008 Apr 21
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 ia64 speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/speex-devel-1.0.4-4.c4.1.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored --------------
2008 Apr 22
0
CESA-2008:0235 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) speex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0235 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0235.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/speex-devel-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/speex-1.0.4-4.c4.1.s390x.rpm
2007 Nov 30
1
Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
I finally picked up a "real" modem (not a winmodem) and put it in my machine. I pulled down the hsfmodem driver from the source, got a license and installed the driver at full power. If I use wvdial, I can get out through the modem, so I know that works. However, sendfax is rejecting the fax capability (from /var/log/sendfax.log): 11/30 00:31:52 sendfax: interim release 1.1.33-Apr10
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: > > Saw this on the Exim List:- > <SNIP> > > I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? > upstream references: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-0235 Note that in the openwall.com URL you provided
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment: https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 & https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592 On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: > >> >
2005 Aug 03
0
fax <--> grandstream 286 <--> asterisk <--> pstn
Hi all, Im having problems using a fax machine conected trough a grandstream 286 sip ATA, it must be able to send and recive fax from pstn, but fax always ends with communication errors 252/244/232 and others. Im using alaw/ulaw codes on pass trough mode, also have tried asterisk faxdetection, nvfaxdetect, disable echo cancellation by hand always with same results. Grandstream ATA is using
2015 Jan 28
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Banton" <centos at web.org.uk> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname > > Hi, > > For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an > obligation to look after
2015 Jan 27
3
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Saw this on the Exim List:- From: Tony Finch <dot--at-- at dotat.at> Subject: [exim] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname remotely exploitable via exim Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:33:45 +0000 "The Exim mail server is exploitable remotely if configured to perform extra security checks on the HELO and EHLO commands ("helo_verify_hosts" or "helo_try_verify_hosts"
2015 Jan 27
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: >>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >>>> >>>> Saw this on the Exim List:- >>>> >>> <SNIP> >>>> >>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 -
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: >> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>> Saw this on the Exim List:- >>> >> <SNIP> >>> >>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? >>> >> >> upstream references: