Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "Нужны оптовые покупатели флагов и и промо продукции на холстах"
2014 Apr 17
0
Поможем пройти сертификацию продукции и услуг. 12 лет на рынке.
??????? ???????????? - ??? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????????. ?????????? ??????????, ??? ????????????????? ?????? ? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? ????? ?? 60% ????, ? ????????? ? ??????? ????? ????? ?? 90%. ?????????, ??????????, ??? ????? ? ????? ???????.
?? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ??????, ????????? ? ??????????? ??????????!
???? ??????:
?? ??????? ??? ???????? ????? ?????????????? ?????????.
2014 Nov 18
0
Сертификация продукции. Свыше 6 лет работы! Гарантия 100%! Звоните!
?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????????????. ?????? ?????. ?????????????? ??????. ??????????? ?? ????? ?????: ???????
???????: +7 (495) 933-78-46
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20141118/f192f9a7/attachment.html>
2018 May 24
2
NEON detection under iOs
Hi,
Thank you for a great work. Opus codec works great under many platforms.
I have found a small performance issue under iOS platform.
If the macro OPUS_HAVE_RTCD is not set, then encoder doesn't use some _neon
functions at low bitrates (up to 64k). If the macro is set, then the
compiler hits the error at opus/celt/arm/armcpu.c:153 (a function for
detection missed). Being compared to Android
2018 Aug 31
1
NEON detection under iOs
Hi,
I believe some Neon code doesn't get invoked properly, because all PRESUME
macros were set in my build.
Probably not all optimized functions are called directly under iOS.
Regards,
Victor
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Lennox
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:59 AM
To: Victor Cherepanov
Cc: opus at xiph.org
Subject: Re: [opus] NEON detection under iOs
On iOS, configure
2016 May 29
2
problems with objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX
On 2016-05-20 19:58, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote:
> I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion:
> - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only
> requires that we support objects of size 65535!
Right, the standard doesn't require it. But I guess you don't imply that
it's fine for clang to silently miscompile
2014 Oct 15
1
Cannot add user to group in Samba AD DC
I create domain in Samba AD DC and add user 'cas' and group 'aaa':
# samba-tool user list | grep cas
cas
# samba-tool group list | grep aaa
aaa
Now I try to add user 'cas' to group 'aaa':
# samba-tool group addmembers aaa cas -Uadministrator
Added members to group aaa
But listmembers does not show this user in group:
# samba-tool group listmembers aaa
2014 Dec 11
1
Error build documentation for samba-4.0.23
Try to build samba-4.0.23 (4.0.22 build without problems):
http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/136130/build/100/x86_64/log
There is error as described in "new" bug
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9515
[2720/2814] Generating manpages/smb.conf.5
...
(many validity errors like ID ABORTSHUTDOWNSCRIPT already defined)
...
runtime error: file
2015 Jun 19
2
Database errors after join to DC as part of AD Forest
Stand contains two DC with Windows 2003 Std SP2 En:
- root domain company.local
- child domain filial1.company.local
I have Linux (ALT Linux) with Samba AD DC 4.2.2. After join to
filial1.company.local by command
samba-tool domain join filial1.company.local DC \
-Uadministrator%P at ssw0rd --realm=filial1.company.local \
--parent-domain=filial1.company.local -d 10
(verbose log is stored)
I
2016 Mar 12
4
samba-4.3.6 and talloc-2.1.6
I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and
samba-4.3.6.
But if I provision domain by command
samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test
--adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc
--use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes
I got error:
Fixing provision GUIDs
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - pytalloc_reference_ex() called for
2016 Mar 12
2
samba-4.3.6 and talloc-2.1.6
12.03.2016 17:57, Rowland penny пишет:
>> What policy of using new version of libraries for stable version of
>> Samba? Can I fix domain provision with talloc-2.1.6 for samba-4.3.6?
>>
>
> Can I ask why you are building talloc separately ? If you build Samba
> normally, it will be built for you. I am no expert here, but I think
> Samba relies on the builtin version of