similar to: [PATCH v2 00/42] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU (non-Radeon)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v2 00/42] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU (non-Radeon)"

2020 Nov 12
1
[PATCH 00/30] [Set 6] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. NB: Hopefully the other sets turn up in -next soon, so they can be rebased and any stragglers re-submitted. Lee Jones (30): drm/savage/savage_bci: Remove set but never used 'aper_rsrc' and 'fb_rsrc' include: drm: drm_atomic:
2020 Nov 16
0
[RESEND 00/42] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU (non-Radeon)
This set contains fixes for some "wouldn't it be nice if" issues, however most of the patches seen here have been on the MLs, but were left unreviewed. Lee Jones (42): drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_encoders: Remove set but unused variable 'backlight_level' drm/armada/armada_overlay: Staticify local function 'armada_overlay_duplicate_state'
2023 May 07
5
[PATCH 00/53] drm: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
Hello, this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because the driver core doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a non-zero return value in .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The device
2018 Dec 10
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > confusing. Split them out. > > > > To make sure I
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >
2018 Dec 29
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >
2018 Dec 10
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:
2018 Dec 10
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:
2018 Dec 10
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:
2019 Jan 07
0
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:56:39PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > > confusing.
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the
2018 Dec 17
0
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >
2018 Nov 12
0
[PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Create and use __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset() everywhere
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:01:14PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > We already have __drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset() and > __drm_atomic_helper_plane_reset(), extend this to crtc as well. > > Most drivers already have a gpu reset hook, correct it. > Nouveau already implemented its own __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset(), > convert it to the common one. > >
2019 Jan 15
0
[PATCH] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of > drm_crtc_helper.h includes. >
2019 Jan 15
0
[PATCH] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On 1/15/19 2:26 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in >> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is >> confusing. Split them out. >> >> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all >> drivers. And indeed, all
2019 Jan 16
0
[PATCH] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 11:41 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of > drm_crtc_helper.h
2016 Jan 18
8
[PATCH 0/5] nouveau: unified firmware loading functions
This patchset centralizes the firmware-loading procedure to one set of functions instead of having each engine load its firmware as it pleases. This helps ensure that all firmware comes from the same place, namely nvidia/<chip>/. This changes where the firmware is fetched from for falcon/xtensa/bios, but these locations never seemed to have been official anyway. Also for most (all?) chips
2017 Aug 11
0
[PATCH v3 00/28] DRM API Conversions
> -----Original Message----- > From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Cihangir Akturk > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:33 AM > Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; intel- > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri- > devel at lists.freedesktop.org; etnaviv at