similar to: [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: make sure that we always zero init mem.bus v2

Hi guys, so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine. Could you give it more testing? Thanks in advance, Christian

Just a gentle ping on this. Already got the Acked-by from Daniel, but I need some of the nouveau guys to test this since I can only compile test it. Regards, Christian.

While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile tested! Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at

Hi guys, I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel. Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it? Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework. Thanks, Christian.

From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> That is not used any more. v2: keep the NULL checks in TTM. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 34 +-------- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 113 +++--------------------------

Implementing those is completely unecessary. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 6 ------ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 11 -----------

Hi guys, I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered). Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and rebased on top of current drm-misc-next. Dave can you test this? At least in theory the approach

Without diving in any of the details, your commit message has me curious and concerned... In a "manager" kind of way, despite being neither a manager nor an insider or active contributor. ;-) On 24/01/2020 14:30, Christian K?nig wrote: > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru

On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 00:30, Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by > Nouveau is actually not working at all. > > In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory > management,

cleanup PAGE_SHIFT operation and replacing ttm_resource resource->start with cursor start using amdgpu_res_first API. v1 -> v2: reorder patch sequence v2 -> v3: addressing review comment v2 Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 10 +++++++--- 2

cleanup PAGE_SHIFT operation and replacing ttm_resource resource->start with cursor start using amdgpu_res_first API. v1 -> v2: reorder patch sequence Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 10 +++++++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6

Pointer variables of (void*) type do not require type cast. Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui at nfschina.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 2 +-

Pointer variables of (void*) type do not require type cast. Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui at nfschina.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 2 +-

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> These are missed cases that I just identified with allyesconfig build. Fixes: 2966141ad2dd ("drm/ttm: rename ttm_mem_reg to ttm_resource.") Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h

While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. v2: don't call ttm_bo_unmap_virtual in nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve v3: rebased and use both base and offset in the check v4:

The value of struct drm_device.ttm.type_vram can become -1 for unknown types of memory (see nouveau_ttm_init()). This leads to an out-of-bounds error when accessing struct nvif_mmu.type[]: [ 18.304116] ================================================================== [ 18.311649] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve+0x17a/0x7e0 [nouveau] [ 18.320415] Read of

Hi Am 10.11.20 um 16:27 schrieb Ruhl, Michael J: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 8:37 AM >> To: bskeggs at redhat.com; airlied at linux.ie; daniel at ffwll.ch; Ruhl, Michael J >> <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>; christian.koenig at amd.com >> Cc: nouveau

Hello Christian K?nig, The patch 141b15e59175: "drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v5" from Aug 21, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:148 nouveau_ttm_fault() warn: inconsistent returns '*bo->base.resv'. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c 126 static vm_fault_t nouveau_ttm_fault(struct

Am 15.10.20 um 14:38 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > The new functions ttm_bo_{vmap,vunmap}() map and unmap a TTM BO in kernel > address space. The mapping's address is returned as struct dma_buf_map. > Each function is a simplified version of TTM's existing kmap code. Both > functions respect the memory's location ani/or writecombine flags. > > On top TTM's

From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile