similar to: Accumulating CPU load from Xorg process with DRI3

I'm aware of this issue, and am experiencing it myself. The issue is that drmmode_event_handler takes up more and more CPU time. It seems like some events are being "left behind". I haven't had time to debug it further yet though. I also have DRI3 enabled, but only very rarely do I make use of my secondary GPUs, and I'm pretty sure I've seen the problem happen without

? ????????? ?? Sunday 16 August 2020 07:20:18 Ilia Mirkin ???????(?): > Well, if it's easy, try the patches I mailed to nouveau@ for the ddx. I applied patches manually (copy-pasted patches failed to apply by git apply, probably whitespace/end of line issues), and now I see in X log (after I left machine to run alone): [ 3584.553] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid

I was testing Ilia's patches for ddx, and while they definitely helped for Xorg itself, qemu still eats a lot of CPU if launched like this qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom ~/Downloads/ISO/slax-English-US-7.0.8-x86_64.iso -m 1G -display sdl,gl=on -enable-kvm and left for few hours. top - 07:38:01 up 18:05, 2 users, load average: 2,00, 1,89, 1,83 Tasks: 224 total, 3 running, 221 sleeping, 0

I've been trying to get oprofile results for jitted code without success. I built an 3.5.0 llvm with oprofile enabled, and tested it with lli on a small test case. I built the latest oprofile from the git repository. Debugging I can see that lli is registering the listener and making the oprofile calls to the libopagent api to specify the names and address ranges of jit'd routines, and

Mi Maurice, A follow up to Andy's comments: MCJIT can find line numbers for ELF files, at least in limited circumstances. I know because I broke the regression test for it while doing some cleanup recently. ;) Looking at lib/ExecutionEngine/OProfileJIT/OProfileJITEventListener.cpp, I see the line: // TODO: support line number info (similar to IntelJITEventListener.cpp) >From a glance at

The DDX eating CPU isn't intrinsically bad. Did you check where perf says the CPU time is going? Could be doing copies/etc. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:52 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was testing Ilia's patches for ddx, and while they definitely helped for Xorg itself, > qemu still eats a lot of CPU if launched like this > >

I rebuild mesa with debug symbols, and now top functions using CPU looks like this: CPU: AMD64 family15h, speed 3800 MHz (estimated) Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (CPU Clocks not Halted) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000 samples % image name symbol name ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 222978 45.1489

Hi, I want to get the performance data like documents <<Xenoprofoverview&Networking Performance Analysis>> (http://www.xensource.com/files/xs0106_xenoprof.pdf ). But how can I get the modules'' profile in kernel? Now I use command: Opcontrol --no-vmlinux --separate=kernel,cpu --start-daemon ...run benchmark Opcontrol --sutdown Opreport >list The report shows: CPU:

Hi , I am getting following error when i try to run xenoprof /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1082: echo: write error: Invalid argument Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface. Reading module info. Using log file /var/lib/oprofile/oprofiled.log Daemon started. what is this write error ? Any help is really appreciated. -John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi , I am getting following error when i try to run xenoprof /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1082: echo: write error: Invalid argument Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface. Reading module info. Using log file /var/lib/oprofile/oprofiled.log Daemon started. what is this write error ? Any help is really appreciated. -John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

Using the small reproducible example below, I'd like to know if one can somehow use the matrix "sig" (defined below) to add a black outline (with lwd=2) to all pixels with a corresponding value of 1 in the matrix 'sig'? So for example, in the ggplot2 plot below, the pixel located at [1,3] would be outlined by a black square since the value at sig[1,3] == 1. This is my first

Hi all, Is anyone using oprofile? I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if it is opreport, or just me. In case it is something just plain daft I am doing, here is how it goes: opcontrol --reset opcontrol --setup --no-vmlinux opcontrol --start ... now I run my program, /tmp/myprog ... opcontrol --dump opcontrol --shutdown then I run, opreport -l

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

Dear R-tisans, I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list. I've

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Dear list members, I have a 2-factor ANOVA where the summary.lm output looks like this (using treatment contrasts): Value Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 0.0389 0.0220 1.7695 0.0817 as.factor(Block)1 0.0156 0.0066 2.3597 0.0215 as.factor(Block)2 -0.0018 0.0037 -0.4857 0.6289 as.factor(Block)3 -0.0007 0.0026 -0.2812 0.7795

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Hi Eric, you can use an annotate-layer, eg ind<-which(sig>0,arr.ind = T) ggplot(m1.melted, aes(x = Month, y = Site, fill = Concentration), autoscale = FALSE, zmin = -1 * zmax1, zmax = zmax1) + geom_tile() + coord_equal() + scale_fill_gradient2(low = "darkred", mid = "white", high = "darkblue",