Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM"
2020 May 13
1
[PATCH 2/2] drm/ttm: deprecate AGP support
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Even when core AGP support is compiled in Radeon and
> Nouveau can also work with the PCI GART.
>
> The AGP support was notorious unstable and hard to
> maintain, so deprecate it for now and only enable it if
> there is a good reason to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at
2020 May 11
10
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
Hi guys,
Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years.
We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory management to get the caching right, abusing the DMA API on multiple occasions, need to distinct between AGP and driver specific page tables etc etc...
So the idea here is to just go ahead and remove the support
2020 May 12
1
[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: remove AGP support
Hi Christian
Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig:
> AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware.
>
> Old hardware should continue to work in PCI mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Makefile | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 7 -
2020 May 13
0
[PATCH 2/2] drm/ttm: deprecate AGP support
Even when core AGP support is compiled in Radeon and
Nouveau can also work with the PCI GART.
The AGP support was notorious unstable and hard to
maintain, so deprecate it for now and only enable it if
there is a good reason to do so.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
2020 May 11
2
[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: remove AGP support
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Christian K?nig
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware.
>
> Old hardware should continue to work in PCI mode.
Might want to clarify that there is no loss of functionality here.
Something like:
"There is no loss of functionality here. GPUs will continue to
2020 May 20
2
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:43 AM Christian K?nig
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Am 13.05.20 um 13:03 schrieb Christian K?nig:
> > Unfortunately AGP is still to widely used as we could just drop support for using its GART.
> >
> > Not using the AGP GART also doesn't mean a loss in functionality since drivers will just fallback to the driver
2023 Aug 09
8
[PATCH -next 0/7] drm: Remove many unnecessary NULL values
The NULL initialization of the pointers assigned by kzalloc() or
kunit_kzalloc() first is not necessary, because if the kzalloc() or
kunit_kzalloc() failed, the pointers will be assigned NULL, otherwise
it works as usual. so remove it.
Ruan Jinjie (7):
drm/amdkfd: Remove unnecessary NULL values
drm/amd/display: Remove unnecessary NULL values
drm/msm: Remove unnecessary NULL values
2020 May 11
0
[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: remove AGP support
AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware.
Old hardware should continue to work in PCI mode.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 7 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 9 -
2020 May 20
2
[RFC] Deprecate AGP GART support for Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
On 2020-05-20 4:43 p.m., Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 13.05.20 um 13:03 schrieb Christian K?nig:
>> Unfortunately AGP is still to widely used as we could just drop
>> support for using its GART.
>>
>> Not using the AGP GART also doesn't mean a loss in functionality since
>> drivers will just fallback to the driver specific PCI GART.
>>
>> For now
2020 Aug 20
3
Moving LRU handling into Nouveau v2
Hi guys,
I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered).
Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and rebased on top of current drm-misc-next.
Dave can you test this? At least in theory the approach
2024 Oct 02
2
[PATCH v2 0/2] drm/ttm: Add an option to report graphics memory OOM
Some graphics APIs differentiate between out-of-graphics-memory and
out-of-host-memory (system memory). Add a device init flag to
have -ENOSPC propagated from the resource managers instead of being
converted to -ENOMEM, to aid driver stacks in determining what
error code to return or whether corrective action can be taken at
the driver level.
The first patch deals with a ttm_device_init()
2014 Jul 09
22
[PATCH 00/17] Convert TTM to the new fence interface.
This series applies on top of the driver-core-next branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
Before converting ttm to the new fence interface I had to fix some
drivers to require a reservation before poking with fence_obj.
After flipping the switch RCU becomes available instead, and
the extra reservations can be dropped again. :-)
I've done at least basic
2019 Sep 05
1
[PATCH 1/8] drm/ttm: turn ttm_bo_device.vma_manager into a pointer
Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager.
ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer.
The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager
argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager.
When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used.
All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change.
Signed-off-by:
2019 Sep 05
1
[PATCH 1/8] drm/ttm: turn ttm_bo_device.vma_manager into a pointer
Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager.
ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer.
The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager
argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager.
When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used.
All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change.
Signed-off-by:
2019 Sep 05
1
[PATCH 1/8] drm/ttm: turn ttm_bo_device.vma_manager into a pointer
Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager.
ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer.
The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager
argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager.
When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used.
All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change.
Signed-off-by:
2014 Jul 31
19
[PATCH 01/19] fence: add debugging lines to fence_is_signaled for the callback
fence_is_signaled callback should support being run in
atomic context, but not in irq context.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
---
include/linux/fence.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
index d174585b874b..c1a4519ba2f5 100644
---
2020 Jan 24
4
TTM/Nouveau cleanups
Hi guys,
I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel.
Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it?
Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework.
Thanks,
Christian.
2014 May 14
17
[RFC PATCH v1 00/16] Convert all ttm drivers to use the new reservation interface
This series depends on the previously posted reservation api patches.
2 of them are not yet in for-next-fences branch of
git://git.linaro.org/people/sumit.semwal/linux-3.x.git
The missing patches are still in my vmwgfx_wip branch at
git://people.freedesktop.org/~mlankhorst/linux
All ttm drivers are converted to the fence api, fence_lock is removed
and rcu is used in its place.
qxl is the first
2024 Oct 04
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/ttm: Change ttm_device_init to use a struct instead of multiple bools
On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 14:54 +0200, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 14:45 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> > Am 02.10.24 um 14:24 schrieb Thomas Hellstr?m:
> > > The ttm_device_init funcition uses multiple bool arguments. That
> > > means
> > > readability in the caller becomes poor, and all callers need to
> > > change if
> > >
2024 Oct 05
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/ttm: Change ttm_device_init to use a struct instead of multiple bools
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:28:29PM +0200, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 14:54 +0200, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 14:45 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> > > Am 02.10.24 um 14:24 schrieb Thomas Hellstr?m:
> > > > The ttm_device_init funcition uses multiple bool arguments. That
> > > > means
> > > >