similar to: [PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh"

2020 Apr 03
3
[PATCH v2 03/17] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of sync with reality. Mostly done with cocci, with the following manual fixups: - Remove the now empty loop in drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes() - Fix __MODE() macro in ch7006_mode.c - Fix DRM_MODE_ARG()
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 03/16] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of sync with reality. Mostly done with cocci, with the following manual fixups: - Remove the now empty loop in drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes() - Fix __MODE() macro in ch7006_mode.c - Fix DRM_MODE_ARG()
2020 Apr 04
0
[PATCH v2 03/17] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
Hi Ville Thanks for the patch. One comment below. Thanks Abhinav On 2020-04-03 13:39, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves > a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of sync > with reality. > > Mostly done with cocci, with the following
2020 Feb 25
2
[PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > > Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves > > a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of sync > > with reality. > > > > Mostly done
2020 Feb 24
0
[PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves > a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of sync > with reality. > > Mostly done with cocci, with the following manual fixups: > - Remove the now empty loop in
2020 Feb 25
0
[PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
On 25.02.2020 12:21, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: >>> From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> >>> >>> Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just calculate it on demand. Saves >>> a bit of space and avoids the cached value getting out of
2020 Feb 25
2
[PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:19:27PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 25.02.2020 12:21, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: > >>> From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > >>> > >>> Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just
2009 Aug 13
9
[PATCHv2 01/10] drm/nouveau: Fix a lock up at NVSetOwner with nv11.
It seems it was only locking up in the context of nouveau_hw_save_vga_fonts, when it actually did something (because the console wasn't already in graphics mode). Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_hw.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_hw.c
2009 Aug 12
14
[PATCH 00/12] TV-out modesetting kernel patches.
This patch series adds TV-out modesetting support to the KMS implementation. I've tried to test it on all the hardware I've got at hand (that is nv11, nv17, nv34, nv35, nv40, nv4b) with every possible output combination; I believe it has reached a mergeable state, however it depends on some commits from drm-next that haven't got into Linus' tree yet, if you agree to merge this
2011 Oct 10
2
2 remaining patches in my patch queue that can be merged
Hi, Here I post these 2 misc patches. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky
2011 Oct 09
11
[PATCH 01/10]: nouveau: assorted fixes
Hi, Here is my patch queue I accumulated over quite a long time. Patches 1-6 are bugfixes, and rest is mostly RFC. Comments are welcome. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky
2011 Nov 24
1
[PATCH] nouveau: implement precise vblank timestamping
This patch implements the drivers hooks needed for precise vblank timestamping. This is a complementary patch to Mario Kleiner's patches to to improve swap scheduling. With the complete patchset applied nouveau will be able to provide correct and precise pageflip timestamps (compliant to OML_sync_control spec) Kudos to Mario for his many helpful comments and testing. Signed-off-by: Lucas
2017 Feb 28
8
[PATCH 2/2] gpu: drm: Convert printk(KERN_<LEVEL> to pr_<level>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:31:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > Use a more common logging style. > > Miscellanea: > > o Coalesce formats and realign arguments > o Neaten a few macros now using pr_<level> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> I know this is pain, but can you pls split this into: - amd/radeon drivers - drm core (anything
2012 Feb 15
2
[Patches][nouveau/kms]: Precise Vblank and pageflip timestamping
Hi, these are two patches against the nouveau kms driver. The first patch makes sure that pageflip completion events get their vblank count and timestamp from the drm. The second patch from Lucas Stach, here included with his permission, makes sure that the timestamps of vblanks are calculated with high precision and robustness. Both patches together make sure that all timestamps returned by the
2012 Apr 25
2
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Use drm_vblank_count_and_time() for pageflip completion events.
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner at tuebingen.mpg.de> Emit kms pageflip completion events with proper vblank count and timestamp for the vblank interval in which the pageflip completed. This makes the timestamps and counts consistent with what the OML_sync_control spec defines. v2 Lucas Stach: rebased on top of nouveau tree and resolved trivial conflict. Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner
2020 May 12
1
[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: remove AGP support
Hi Christian Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig: > AGP is deprecated for 10+ years now and not used any more on modern hardware. > > Old hardware should continue to work in PCI mode. > > Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Makefile | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 7 -
2020 May 11
10
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
Hi guys, Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years. We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory management to get the caching right, abusing the DMA API on multiple occasions, need to distinct between AGP and driver specific page tables etc etc... So the idea here is to just go ahead and remove the support
2019 May 27
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: force scaler for any non-default LVDS/eDP modes
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 08:41, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > Higher layers tend to add a lot of modes not actually in the EDID, such > as the standard DMT modes. Changing this would be extremely intrusive to > everyone, so just force the scaler more often. There are no practical > cases we're aware of where a LVDS/eDP panel has multiple resolutions >
2019 Dec 20
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 38/52] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: fix panel scaling
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 3d1890ef8023e61934e070021b06cc9f417260c0 ] Under certain circumstances, encoder atomic_check() can be entered without adjusted_mode having been reset to the same as mode, which confuses the scaling logic and can lead to a misprogrammed display. Fix this by checking against the user-provided mode directly. Link:
2019 May 25
3
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: force scaler for any non-default LVDS/eDP modes
Higher layers tend to add a lot of modes not actually in the EDID, such as the standard DMT modes. Changing this would be extremely intrusive to everyone, so just force the scaler more often. There are no practical cases we're aware of where a LVDS/eDP panel has multiple resolutions exposed, and i915 already does it this way. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110660