similar to: [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Remove struct nouveau_framebuffer

Note I'm adding some fields to nouveau_framebuffer in the series "drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers." I sent out v3 of that yesterday. It would probably still be possible to avoid them by re-extracting the relevant data from the format modifier on the fly when needed, but it is simpler and likely less error-prone with the wrapper struct. Thanks, -James On 2/6/20

Yes, that's certainly viable. If that's the general preference in direction, I'll rework that patches to do so. Thanks, -James On 2/6/20 7:49 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi James > > Am 06.02.20 um 16:17 schrieb James Jones: >> Note I'm adding some fields to nouveau_framebuffer in the series >> "drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers."?

The format modifiers, when present, override the equivalent field in the BO. Right now, that's probably not particularly useful. However, as nouveau interfaces evolve towards the HW capabilities and add support for newer graphics APIs, saying an entire BO has a singular layout becomes less meaningful, so I suspect those fields will be effectively deprecated in favor of the

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 07:10, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: > > I've sent out a v4 version of the format modifier patches which avoid > caching values in the nouveau_framebuffer struct. It will have a few > trivial conflicts with your series, but should make them structurally > compatible. > > I'm fine with either v3 or v4 of my series personally,

On 2/10/20 12:25 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 10.02.20 um 09:20 schrieb Ben Skeggs: >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 07:10, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've sent out a v4 version of the format modifier patches which avoid >>> caching values in the nouveau_framebuffer struct. It will have a few >>> trivial

This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode setting blobs. Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the Mesa-dev gitlab merge request 3724: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3724 I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware using

This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode setting blobs. Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the Mesa-dev gitlab merge request 3724: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3724 I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware using

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 4:04 PM James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: > > Allow setting the block layout of a nouveau FB > object using DRM format modifiers. When > specified, the format modifier block layout and > kind overrides the GEM buffer's implicit layout > and kind. The specified format modifier is > validated against he list of modifiers supported

This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode setting blobs. Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cubanismo/mesa/tree/nouveau_work But those need a bit of cleanup before they're ready to submit. I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal,

This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode setting blobs. Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the Mesa-dev mailing list as the series: nouveau: Improved format modifier support I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware using various formats

This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode setting blobs. Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cubanismo/mesa/tree/nouveau_work But those need a bit of cleanup before they're ready to submit. I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal,

Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes, the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver. In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer

Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes, the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver. In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer

Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes, the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver. In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer

This fixes a kernel oops when loading the nouveau module with fb console enabled after the change: drm/nouveau: Remove field nvbo from struct nouveau_framebuffer state->fb may be NULL in nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(), so defer initializing nvbo from its obj[] array until after the NULL check. Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 3

The code expects non-VRAM mem nodes to have a pages list. If that's not set, it will do a null deref down the line. Warn on that condition and return an error. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64774 Reported-by: Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> Tested-by: Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Cc: <stable

This patch set replaces the occurrences of drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() with the new drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() functions. All patches in the series do the same thing, converting to the new APIs. I created patches per DRM driver as suggested by Daniel Vetter. Background: In the kernel, reference counting APIs use *_get(), *_put() style naming to reference-count the objects. But DRM

This patch set replaces functions named {un,reference} by their {put,get} counterparts. Affected data types are struct drm_connector, struct drm_framebuffer, struct drm_gem_object, and struct drm_device. With the reference-counting functions being named {put,get}, the DRM interface is more aligned to Linux kernel nameing standard. The patch set does not change driver-internal interfaces. Thomas

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote: > Op 22-08-13 02:10, Ilia Mirkin schreef: >> The code expects non-VRAM mem nodes to have a pages list. If that's not >> set, it will do a null deref down the line. Warn on that condition and >> return an error. >> >> See

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c index 3ed12a8cfc91..a4a586807903 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper, ret = -ENOMEM; goto