similar to: Move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver

While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile tested! Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at

Hi guys, I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel. Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it? Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework. Thanks, Christian.

We are trying to remove the io_lru handling and depend on zero init base, offset and addr here. v2: init addr as well Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644 ---

Hi guys, so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine. Could you give it more testing? Thanks in advance, Christian

Implementing those is completely unecessary. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 6 ------ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 11 -----------

From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> That is not used any more. v2: keep the NULL checks in TTM. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 34 +-------- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 113 +++--------------------------

The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be used in a driver. Instead call the qxl_ttm_io_mem_reserve() function directly. Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c | 11 +---------- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+),

Without diving in any of the details, your commit message has me curious and concerned... In a "manager" kind of way, despite being neither a manager nor an insider or active contributor. ;-) On 24/01/2020 14:30, Christian K?nig wrote: > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru

On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 00:30, Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by > Nouveau is actually not working at all. > > In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory > management,

Hi guys, I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered). Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and rebased on top of current drm-misc-next. Dave can you test this? At least in theory the approach

Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio: >> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be >> used in a driver. >> > As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported > (that is not internal) functions. > Not that the idea of making them internal is bad but this comment is > a wrong statement. See the history of

Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio: >> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be >> used in a driver. >> > As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported > (that is not internal) functions. > Not that the idea of making them internal is bad but this comment is > a wrong statement. See the history of

Am 30.09.19 um 11:51 schrieb Frediano Ziglio: >> Am 27.09.19 um 18:31 schrieb Frediano Ziglio: >>>> The ttm_mem_io_* functions are actually internal to TTM and shouldn't be >>>> used in a driver. >>>> >>> As far as I can see by your second patch QXL is just using exported >>> (that is not internal) functions. >>> Not that the

Hello Christian K?nig, The patch 141b15e59175: "drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v5" from Aug 21, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:148 nouveau_ttm_fault() warn: inconsistent returns '*bo->base.resv'. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c 126 static vm_fault_t nouveau_ttm_fault(struct

Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager. ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer. The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager. When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used. All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change. Signed-off-by:

Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager. ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer. The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager. When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used. All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change. Signed-off-by:

Rename the embedded struct vma_offset_manager, new name is _vma_manager. ttm_bo_device.vma_manager changed to a pointer. The ttm_bo_device_init() function gets an additional vma_manager argument which allows to initialize ttm with a different vma manager. When passing NULL the embedded _vma_manager is used. All callers are updated to pass NULL, so the behavior doesn't change. Signed-off-by:

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h