similar to: [PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: make base917c_format static

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

The hardware supports either size. Also add checks to ensure that only these two sizes may be used for supplying a LUT. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Only tested on G84 and GK208. The GV100+ is entirely untested. With the fixed modetest tool, setting ilut and olut sizes to different quantities seems to work out OK, across a range of formats (XR24, XB30, XB4H).

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

The hardware supports either size. Also add checks to ensure that only these two sizes may be used for supplying a LUT. Finally, experimental evidence suggests you can't mix sizes for degamma and gamma. Disallow this as well. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Note that all the gv100+ changes are purely speculative. Tested on a GK208 with 8- and 10-bpc formats

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

The following functions are not declared outside of the file they are in, so make them static to avoid these warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:745:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:760:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_stop_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be

Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result, on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine to hang. So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that can't actually

Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result, on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine to hang. So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that can't actually

Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result, on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine to hang. So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that can't actually

Include n50_display.h for the definition of nv50_display_create to fix the warning (and remove the now non-exported definitions in the n50_display.h to allow the code to build): drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:2297:1: warning: symbol 'nv50_display_create' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk> ---

If CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y,the following errors are seen while building crc.h. In file included from /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:47: /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h: In function ?nv50_head_crc_late_register?: /scratch/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crc.h:109:47: error: parameter name omitted static inline int

While we're not quite ready yet to add support for flexible wndw mappings, we are going to need to at least keep track of the static wndw mappings we're currently using in each head's atomic state. We'll likely use this in the future to implement real flexible window mapping, but the primary reason we'll need this is for CRC support. See: on nvidia hardware, each CRC entry in

While we're not quite ready yet to add support for flexible wndw mappings, we are going to need to at least keep track of the static wndw mappings we're currently using in each head's atomic state. We'll likely use this in the future to implement real flexible window mapping, but the primary reason we'll need this is for CRC support. See: on nvidia hardware, each CRC entry in

While we're not quite ready yet to add support for flexible wndw mappings, we are going to need to at least keep track of the static wndw mappings we're currently using in each head's atomic state. We'll likely use this in the future to implement real flexible window mapping, but the primary reason we'll need this is for CRC support. See: on nvidia hardware, each CRC entry in

Make ga100_mc_device static as it isn't exported, to fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c:51:1: warning: symbol 'ga100_mc_device' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git