similar to: [PATCH 1/5] drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: make undeclared symbols static

The gv100_disp_wimm is not declared, so make it static to avoid the following warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c:39:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wimm' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

The base917c_format isn't exported, so make it static to avoid the following warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base917c.c:26:1: warning: symbol 'base917c_format' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base917c.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Do not export gv100_fifo_runlist as it isn't not used to remove the following morning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c:56:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_fifo_runlist' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Make ga100_mc_device static as it isn't exported, to fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c:51:1: warning: symbol 'ga100_mc_device' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, here's a revised subset of the patches I had sent out a couple of weeks ago. I've reworked the BAR2 accesses in the way that you had suggested, which at least for GP10B turned out to be fairly trivial to do. I have not looked in detail at this for GV11B yet, but a cursory look showed that BAR2 is accessed in more places, so the

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, here's a revised subset of the patches I had sent out a couple of weeks ago. I've reworked the BAR2 accesses in the way that you had suggested, which at least for GP10B turned out to be fairly trivial to do. I have not looked in detail at this for GV11B yet, but a cursory look showed that BAR2 is accessed in more places, so the

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi, the GPU on Jetson TX2 (GP10B) does not work properly on all devices. Why exactly is not clear, but there are slight differences between the SKUs that were tested. It turns out that the biggest issue is that on some devices (e.g. the one that I have), pulsing the GPU reset twice as is done in the current code (once as part of the power-ungate

CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p at virginia.edu> Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat at gmx.de> Cc: Jaya Kumar <jayalk at intworks.biz> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Russell King <linux at

CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p at virginia.edu> Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat at gmx.de> Cc: Jaya Kumar <jayalk at intworks.biz> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Russell King <linux at

CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p at virginia.edu> Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat at gmx.de> Cc: Jaya Kumar <jayalk at intworks.biz> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Russell King <linux at