similar to: [PATCH trivial] gpu: Fix Kconfig indentation

Adjust indentation from spaces to tab (+optional two spaces) as in coding style with command like: $ sed -e 's/^ /\t/' -i */Kconfig Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> --- Changes since v1: 1. Fix also DRM_AMD_DC_HDCP (new arrival since v1). --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig | 32 ++---

Adjust indentation from spaces to tab (+optional two spaces) as in coding style with command like: $ sed -e 's/^ /\t/' -i */Kconfig Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> --- Changes since v2: 1. Split AMD and i915 to separate patches. --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 8 ++++----

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com> wrote: > 'default n' is the default value for any bool or tristate Kconfig > setting so there is no need to write it explicitly. > > Also since commit f467c5640c29 ("kconfig: only write '# CONFIG_FOO > is not set' for visible symbols") the Kconfig behavior is the same >

'default n' is the default value for any bool or tristate Kconfig setting so there is no need to write it explicitly. Also since commit f467c5640c29 ("kconfig: only write '# CONFIG_FOO is not set' for visible symbols") the Kconfig behavior is the same regardless of 'default n' being present or not: ... One side effect of (and the main motivation for)

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > confusing. Split them out. > > > > To make sure I

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:56:39PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > > confusing.

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit : > > Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of > drm_crtc_helper.h includes. >

On 1/15/19 2:26 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in >> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is >> confusing. Split them out. >> >> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all >> drivers. And indeed, all

On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 11:41 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of > drm_crtc_helper.h

> -----Original Message----- > From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Cihangir Akturk > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:33 AM > Cc: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; intel- > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri- > devel at lists.freedesktop.org; etnaviv at

Hello, this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because the driver core doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a non-zero return value in .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The device