similar to: [PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures

Hi Greg, This feels like it's missing a From: line. commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500 drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures Is this an artifact of your notification-of-patches process and I never noticed before, or was the patch ingested incorrectly? Cheers, -ilia

From: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 ] This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a debugging message on VCPI failures instead. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >Hi Greg, > >This feels like it's missing a From: line. > >commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 >Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> >Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500 > > drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures > >Is this an artifact of your

This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a debugging message on VCPI failures instead. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Fixes: f479c0ba4a17 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: initial support for DP 1.2

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> > Hi Greg, >> > >> > This feels like it's missing a From: line. >> > >> > commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 >> > Author:

This fixes the extra issues I discovered upstream after the introduction of my rework of the atomic VCPI helpers that occur during suspend/resume. This time around, we use a slightly different but much less complicated approach for fixing said issues. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Fix unbalanced malloc ref in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > This feels like it's missing a From: line. > > > > commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 > > Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > > Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500 > >

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:01:11AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > This feels like it's missing a From: line.

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:01 AM Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> > Hi Greg, > >> > > >> > This feels like it's

This fixes the extra issues I discovered upstream after the introduction of my rework of the atomic VCPI helpers that occur during suspend/resume. This time around, we use a slightly different but much less complicated approach for fixing said issues. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Fix unbalanced malloc ref in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()

Atomic checks should never modify anything outside of the state that they're passed in. Unfortunately this appears to be exactly what we're doing in nv50_msto_atomic_check() where we update mstc->pbn every time the function is called. This hasn't caused any bugs yet, but it needs to be fixed in order to ensure that when committing an artificially duplicated state (like during system

Realized when I moved nouveau over to using the atomic DP MST VCPI helpers that I forgot to ensure that we clamp the BPC to 8 to make us less likely to run out of bandwidth on a topology when enabling multiple displays that support >8 BPC - something we want to do until we have support for dynamically selecting the bpc based on the topology's available bandwidth, since userspace isn't

[sorry about the resend-copy pasted the wrong header and I want to make sure this doesn't get missed!] This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude

This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (5): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI

This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (5): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *

This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI

This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. [sorry for still not adding your R-Bs! I ended up needing to make a lot of changes to make it so we do actually kref() each port in the atomic state] Cc: Daniel

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *

So we don't ever have to worry about drivers touching drm_dp_mst_port structs without verifying them and crashing again. Lyude Paul (6): drm/dp_mst: Add drm_dp_get_payload_info() drm/nouveau: Use drm_dp_get_payload_info() for getting payload/vcpi drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_get_modes() drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_detect() drm/dp_mst: