similar to: [PATCH v8 1/6] drm/dp_mst: Add PBN calculation for DSC modes

With DSC, bpp can be fractional in multiples of 1/16. Change drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode to reflect this, adding a new parameter bool dsc. When this parameter is true, treat the bpp parameter as having units not of bits per pixel, but 1/16 of a bit per pixel v2: Don't add separate function for this Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx at

With DSC, bpp can be fractional in multiples of 1/16. Change drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode to reflect this, adding a new parameter bool dsc. When this parameter is true, treat the bpp parameter as having units not of bits per pixel, but 1/16 of a bit per pixel v2: Don't add separate function for this Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx at

With DSC, bpp can be fractional in multiples of 1/16. Change drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode to reflect this, adding a new parameter bool dsc. When this parameter is true, treat the bpp parameter as having units not of bits per pixel, but 1/16 of a bit per pixel v2: Don't add separate function for this Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx at

From: David Francis <David.Francis at amd.com> With DSC, bpp can be fractional in multiples of 1/16. Change drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode to reflect this, adding a new parameter bool dsc. When this parameter is true, treat the bpp parameter as having units not of bits per pixel, but 1/16 of a bit per pixel v2: Don't add separate function for this Change-Id:

On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 18:17 +0000, William Lewis wrote: > On 8/8/19 1:04 PM, Lyude Paul wrote: > > I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't > > test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake > > with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: > > > > * CRTC #1 has n VCPI

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *

Yes, apparently we've been testing this for every single driver load for quite a long time now. At least that means our PBN calculation is solid! Anyway, introduce self tests for MST and move this into there. Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan at

On 8/8/19 1:04 PM, Lyude Paul wrote: > I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't > test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake > with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: > > * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 > which is attached to encoder #1.

Since nv50_outp_atomic_check_view() can set crtc_state->mode_changed, we probably should be calling it before handling any PBN changes. Just a precaution. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Fixes: 232c9eec417a ("drm/nouveau: Use atomic VCPI helpers for MST") Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Cc: David

Atomic checks should never modify anything outside of the state that they're passed in. Unfortunately this appears to be exactly what we're doing in nv50_msto_atomic_check() where we update mstc->pbn every time the function is called. This hasn't caused any bugs yet, but it needs to be fixed in order to ensure that when committing an artificially duplicated state (like during system

Looks like a regression got introduced into nv50_mstc_atomic_check() that somehow didn't get found until now. If userspace changes crtc_state->active to false but leaves the CRTC enabled, we end up calling drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() using the PBN calculated in asyh->dp.pbn. However, if the display is inactive we end up calculating a PBN of 0, which inadvertently causes us to have an

Now that we've added the hooks that we've needed for this and used them in i915, let's add one more hook (which I could use some feedback on, I'm not sure if it's worth maybe just reworking how we do mode pruning in nouveau instead...) and start using this in our mst ->mode_valid callback to filter out impossible to set modes on MST connectors. Lyude Paul (2):

Realized when I moved nouveau over to using the atomic DP MST VCPI helpers that I forgot to ensure that we clamp the BPC to 8 to make us less likely to run out of bandwidth on a topology when enabling multiple displays that support >8 BPC - something we want to do until we have support for dynamically selecting the bpc based on the topology's available bandwidth, since userspace isn't

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 05:36:12PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > It's next to impossible for us to do connector probing on topologies > without occasionally racing with userspace, since creating a connector > itself causes a hotplug event which we have to send before probing the > available PBN of a connector. Even if we didn't have this hotplug event > sent, there's still

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 01:13:36PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:11 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 05:36:12PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > It's next to impossible for us to do connector probing on topologies > > > without occasionally racing with userspace, since creating a connector > > > itself causes a

This fixes the extra issues I discovered upstream after the introduction of my rework of the atomic VCPI helpers that occur during suspend/resume. This time around, we use a slightly different but much less complicated approach for fixing said issues. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Fix unbalanced malloc ref in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()

This fixes the extra issues I discovered upstream after the introduction of my rework of the atomic VCPI helpers that occur during suspend/resume. This time around, we use a slightly different but much less complicated approach for fixing said issues. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Fix unbalanced malloc ref in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()

Currently, nouveau uses the yolo method of setting up MST displays: it uses the old VCPI helpers (drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots()) for computing the display configuration. These helpers don't take care to make sure they take a reference to the mstb port that they're checking, and additionally don't actually check whether or not the topology still has enough bandwidth to provide the VCPI

Currently, nouveau uses the yolo method of setting up MST displays: it uses the old VCPI helpers (drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots()) for computing the display configuration. These helpers don't take care to make sure they take a reference to the mstb port that they're checking, and additionally don't actually check whether or not the topology still has enough bandwidth to provide the VCPI