Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/2] mm/hmm: two bug fixes for hmm_range_fault()"
2019 Aug 27
2
[PATCH 2/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() infinite loop
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:53PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com>
> mm/hmm.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 29371485fe94..4882b83aeccb 100644
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_hole_(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>
2019 Jul 26
13
[PATCH v2 0/7] mm/hmm: more HMM clean up
Here are seven more patches for things I found to clean up.
This was based on top of Christoph's seven patches:
"hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v3".
I assume this will go into Jason's tree since there will likely be
more HMM changes in this cycle.
Changes from v1 to v2:
Added AMD GPU to hmm_update removal.
Added 2 patches from Christoph.
Added 2 patches as
2019 Aug 26
1
[PATCH 1/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() NULL pointer bug
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:02:12AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>
> On 8/24/19 3:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> > > Although hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() to make sure that a vma exists
> > > before calling walk_page_range(), hmm_vma_walk_hole() can still be called
> > > with
2019 Aug 24
2
[PATCH 1/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() NULL pointer bug
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> Although hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() to make sure that a vma exists
> before calling walk_page_range(), hmm_vma_walk_hole() can still be called
> with walk->vma == NULL if the start and end address are not contained
> within the vma range.
Should we convert to walk_vma_range instead? Or keep walk_page_range
2019 Aug 23
0
[PATCH 2/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() infinite loop
Normally, callers to handle_mm_fault() are supposed to check the
vma->vm_flags first. hmm_range_fault() checks for VM_READ but doesn't
check for VM_WRITE if the caller requests a page to be faulted in
with write permission (via the hmm_range.pfns[] value).
If the vma is write protected, this can result in an infinite loop:
hmm_range_fault()
walk_page_range()
...
2019 Aug 23
0
[PATCH 1/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() NULL pointer bug
Although hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() to make sure that a vma exists
before calling walk_page_range(), hmm_vma_walk_hole() can still be called
with walk->vma == NULL if the start and end address are not contained
within the vma range.
hmm_range_fault() /* calls find_vma() but no range check */
walk_page_range() /* calls find_vma(), sets walk->vma = NULL */
__walk_page_range()
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 1/6] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault, snapshot}
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:14 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote:
>
> We should not have two different error codes for the same condition. In
> addition this really complicates the code due to the special handling of
> EAGAIN that drops the mmap_sem due to the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY logic
> in the core vm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at
2019 Jul 24
10
hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v3
Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason,
below is a series against the hmm tree which fixes up the mmap_sem
locking in nouveau and while at it also removes leftover legacy HMM APIs
only used by nouveau.
The first 4 patches are a bug fix for nouveau, which I suspect should
go into this merge window even if the code is marked as staging, just
to avoid people copying the breakage.
Changes since v2:
- new patch
2019 Aug 27
0
[PATCH 2/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() infinite loop
On 8/27/19 11:41 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:53PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com>
>> mm/hmm.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
>> index 29371485fe94..4882b83aeccb 100644
>> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
>> @@
2020 May 01
13
[PATCH hmm v2 0/5] Adjust hmm_range_fault() API
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
The API is a bit complicated for the uses we actually have, and
disucssions for simplifying have come up a number of times.
This small series removes the customizable pfn format and simplifies the
return code of hmm_range_fault()
All the drivers are adjusted to process in the simplified format.
I would appreciated tested-by's for the two
2019 Sep 11
6
[PATCH 0/4] HMM tests and minor fixes
These changes are based on Jason's latest hmm branch.
Patch 1 was previously posted here [1] but was dropped from the orginal
series. Hopefully, the tests will reduce concerns about edge conditions.
I'm sure more tests could be usefully added but I thought this was a good
starting point.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190726005650.2566-6-rcampbell at nvidia.com/
Ralph Campbell
2019 Jul 30
29
hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v3
Hi Jérôme, Ben, Felxi and Jason,
below is a series against the hmm tree which cleans up various minor
bits and allows HMM_MIRROR to be built on all architectures.
Diffstat:
7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
A git tree is also available at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git hmm-cleanups
Gitweb:
2020 Apr 22
11
[PATCH hmm 0/5] Adjust hmm_range_fault() API
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
The API is a bit complicated for the uses we actually have, and
disucssions for simplifying have come up a number of times.
This small series removes the customizable pfn format and simplifies the
return code of hmm_range_fault()
All the drivers are adjusted to process in the simplified format.
I would appreciated tested-by's for the two
2019 Aug 06
24
hmm cleanups, v2
Hi Jérôme, Ben, Felix and Jason,
below is a series against the hmm tree which cleans up various minor
bits and allows HMM_MIRROR to be built on all architectures.
Diffstat:
11 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-)
A git tree is also available at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git hmm-cleanups.2
Gitweb:
2019 Jul 01
30
dev_pagemap related cleanups v4
Hi Dan, Jérôme and Jason,
below is a series that cleans up the dev_pagemap interface so that
it is more easily usable, which removes the need to wrap it in hmm
and thus allowing to kill a lot of code
Note: this series is on top of Linux 5.2-rc6 and has some minor
conflicts with the hmm tree that are easy to resolve.
Diffstat summary:
34 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 1016 deletions(-)
Git
2019 Sep 11
0
[PATCH 1/4] mm/hmm: make full use of walk_page_range()
hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() and walk_page_range() in a loop.
This is unnecessary duplication since walk_page_range() calls find_vma()
in a loop already.
Simplify hmm_range_fault() by defining a walk_test() callback function
to filter unhandled vmas.
This also fixes a bug where hmm_range_fault() was not checking
start >= vma->vm_start before checking vma->vm_flags so
2019 Aug 14
2
[PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma_walk
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:36:33PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Section alignment constraints somewhat save us here. The only example
> I can think of a PMD not containing a uniform pgmap association for
> each pte is the case when the pgmap overlaps normal dram, i.e. shares
> the same 'struct memory_section' for a given span. Otherwise, distinct
> pgmaps arrange to manage
2019 Aug 07
2
[PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma_walk
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:05:42PM +0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is only a single place where the pgmap is passed over a function
> call, so replace it with local variables in the places where we deal
> with the pgmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> mm/hmm.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file
2020 Mar 17
2
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:15:36AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
> > look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
> > another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?
>
> Isn't that what this series basically does?
>
> The
2016 Oct 25
5
CVE-2016-5195 DirtyCOW : Critical Linux Kernel Flaw
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200
Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote:
> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
> attacks using ptrace.
I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel
(local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix.
Ask