Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix bogus GPL-2 license header"
2018 Sep 09
2
[Bug 107874] New: Incorrect SPDX-License-Identifier on various nouveau drm kernel source files?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107874
Bug ID: 107874
Summary: Incorrect SPDX-License-Identifier on various nouveau
drm kernel source files?
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: NetBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
2017 Nov 06
0
[PATCH v3] pmu/fuc: don't use movw directly anymore
Fixes failure to compile with recent envyas as a result of the 'movw'
alias being removed for v5.
A bit of history:
v3 only has a 16-bit sign-extended immediate mov op. In order to set
the high bits, there's a separate 'sethi' op. envyas validates that
the value passed to mov(imm) is between -0x8000 and 0x7fff. In order
to simplify macros that load both the low and high word,
2016 Mar 10
0
[PATCH] gr/fuc: Store $r0 in interrupt handler
It's supposed to always be 0, but at least nv_iowr() temporarily violates
this. Since the ih touches $r0, it should be stored.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rs855 at cam.ac.uk>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/fuc/gpc.fuc | 2 +
drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/fuc/gpcgf100.fuc3.h | 80 ++++----
drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/fuc/gpcgf117.fuc3.h | 82 ++++----
2017 Nov 01
0
[PATCH] pmu/fuc: don't use movw directly anymore
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote:
> fixes compilation issues with recent envytools, because movw was removed
> from fuc5, because it doesn't exist there anymore. The current code is
> most likely broken for fuc5 hardware as well and might have triggered all
> kinds of random memory reclocking fails.
>
> Changes in fuc3 binaries
2017 Nov 01
2
[PATCH] pmu/fuc: don't use movw directly anymore
fixes compilation issues with recent envytools, because movw was removed
from fuc5, because it doesn't exist there anymore. The current code is
most likely broken for fuc5 hardware as well and might have triggered all
kinds of random memory reclocking fails.
Changes in fuc3 binaries are tue do opcode optimizations using shorter
opcodes when possible.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst
2015 Oct 26
0
[PATCH 3/4] subdev/pmu/fuc: implement perf
From: Karol Herbst <git at karolherbst.de>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf100.fuc3.h | 788 +++++++++++++++------------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf119.fuc4.h | 740 ++++++++++++++-----------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gk104.fuc4.h | 740 ++++++++++++++-----------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gk208.fuc5.h | 710 ++++++++++++++----------
2017 Nov 06
0
[PATCH v2] pmu/fuc: don't use movw directly anymore
Fixes failure to compile with recent envyas as a result of the 'movw'
alias being removed for v5.
A bit of history:
v3 only has a 16-bit sign-extended immediate mov op. In order to set
the high bits, there's a separate 'sethi' op. envyas validates that
the value passed to mov(imm) is between -0x8000 and 0x7fff. In order
to simplify macros that load both the low and high word,
2016 Mar 01
1
[PATCH 4/4] pmu/fuc: movw is somewhat weird on gk208, use mov instead
On 01/03/16 23:38, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote:
>> On 26/02/16 17:19, Karol Herbst wrote:
>>> currently there is no change, because nobody uses those macros yet, but
>>> they
>>> shouldn't stay broken
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at
2016 Feb 26
0
[PATCH 2/4] pmu/fuc: replace mov+sethi with imm32
on gk208+ we can simply mov 32bits, so we should have a single mov there
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf100.fuc3.h | 1598 +++++++++++------------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf119.fuc4.h | 1494 +++++++++++-----------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gk208.fuc5.h | 1424 ++++++++++-----------
2016 Feb 08
4
[PATCH 0/4] PMU engine counters
these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer
The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads
currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want
to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for
convenience
Anyway there are still some issues I would like to discuss:
1. currently the
2016 Feb 16
4
[PATCH v2 0/4] PMU engine counters
these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer
The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads
currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want
to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for
convenience. Using nvif would have the advantage, that userspace tools can
easily get loads
2016 Mar 01
0
[PATCH 4/4] pmu/fuc: movw is somewhat weird on gk208, use mov instead
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote:
> On 26/02/16 17:19, Karol Herbst wrote:
>>
>> currently there is no change, because nobody uses those macros yet, but
>> they
>> shouldn't stay broken
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de>
>> ---
>>
2017 Jun 05
7
[PATCH v3 0/7] PMU engine counters
I think I am done reworking the series and getting to a point where I think
it is basically finished. The configuration of the slots could be improved
later on when working on dynamic reclocking, but for now it's good enough to
report the current GPU utilization to userspace.
Patches 1-4 imeplement PMU commands to setup and readout the counters.
Patches 5-6 lets Nouveau make use of 1-4.
Patch
2015 Oct 26
9
[PATCH 0/4] Add pdaemon load counters
this series makes use of the load counters we can use to get information about
the current load of the gpu.
This series includes the needed pmu bits and a debugfs interface to read them
out. Currently the values are between 0 and 255, because it is much easier to
implement it this way on the pmu.
Karol Herbst (4):
subdev/pmu/fuc: add gk104
pmu/fuc: add macros for pdaemon pwr counters
2017 May 07
6
[RFC v2 0/6] PMU engine counters
reworked this series quite a lot.
Now we want the Host to configure the counters through the PMU.
The series isn't complete though because it needs:
1. reordering
2. better commit messages
but I felt like sending those out before doing a final version.
I also found some weird register overwriting issue on the PMU I have to track
down, because it interfers with the counter read out. I am
2016 Mar 01
2
[PATCH 4/4] pmu/fuc: movw is somewhat weird on gk208, use mov instead
On 26/02/16 17:19, Karol Herbst wrote:
> currently there is no change, because nobody uses those macros yet, but they
> shouldn't stay broken
>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de>
> ---
> drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
2016 Feb 26
0
[PATCH 3/4] pmu/fuc: call# seems to be broken on gk208
for some reasons these calls don't really go there where they should go
leading to various corruptions of the PMU state
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gk208.fuc5.h | 12 ++++++------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/kernel.fuc | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
2023 May 22
0
[PATCH 6.3 004/364] drm/nouveau/disp: More DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE array fixes
From: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
[ Upstream commit 25feda6fbd0cfefcb69308fb20d4d4815a107c5e ]
More arrays (and arguments) for dcpd were set to 16, when it looks like
DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE (15) should be used. Fix the remaining cases, seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/outp.c: In function 'nvif_outp_acquire_dp':
../include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33:
2023 Feb 04
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/disp: More DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE array fixes
More arrays (and arguments) for dcpd were set to 16, when it looks like
DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE (15) should be used. Fix the remaining cases, seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/outp.c: In function 'nvif_outp_acquire_dp':
../include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: warning: array subscript 'unsigned char[16][0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u8[15]' {aka
2016 Oct 27
0
[PATCH] pmu: remove reset() hook
The reset hook of pmu_func is never called, and gt215 was the only chip
to implement. Remove this dead code.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/gt215.c | 9 ---------
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/priv.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/gt215.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/gt215.c
index