similar to: [Bug 110931] New: Timeout initializing Falcon after cold boot

Hi! First of all, I have to admit that it is my first post on this list, so please be lenied toward me, if I don't obey some of the rules ;-) I'll try my best :-) I am just trying to get my samba-server work as a print server by using CUPS. The OS of the server is Gentoo Linux and I'm using samba-3.0.9-r1. The clients are win 2k/xp home. I can already see my shares (files and

Some firmware images may be large (64K), so using kmalloc memory is inappropriate for them. Use vmalloc instead, to avoid high-order allocation failures. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- Couldn't get video decoding started on a long-running system due to high-order allocation failures. This seems like a fine use-case for vmalloc.

Hi all, I'd like to add Falcon, the Java JIT compiler we've been working on at Azul Systems for the last few years, to Users.html. I've attached a patch, please take a look. Thanks! -- Sanjoy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: falcon.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 681 bytes Desc: not available URL:

I have been experimenting with getting various (usually older) D3D games running under wine and have so far been very impressed with the results - a big thank you is due to all the wine developers who have got things to this stage. With Falcon 4.0 (1.08us), however, I am stuck. The game interface works apparently perfectly, along with the background sound/music, but when I go to fly, I get black

The IRQ mask of the PMU falcon was left - replace it with the proper irq_mask variable. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/base.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/base.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/base.c index b718ba79177c..05c62549c39b 100644 ---

Make sure we are not disturbed by spurious interrupts, as we poll the halt bit anyway. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm200.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm200.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm200.c index 4932757ab1a2..5801babdf959 100644 ---

Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used by other subdevs (i.e. secboot). Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pmu.h | 2 ++ drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pmu.h

Hello Alexandre Courbot, This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings. The patch 9b536e9d5251: "drm/nouveau/falcon: add msgqueue interface" from Jan 19, 2017, leads to the following Smatch complaint: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/msgqueue.c:514 nvkm_msgqueue_recv() error: we previously assumed 'queue' could be null (see line 513)

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c index 816ccaedfc73..8675613e142b 100644 ---

From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> [ Upstream commit a5176a4cb85bb6213daadf691097cf411da35df2 ] Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c | 7

From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> [ Upstream commit a5176a4cb85bb6213daadf691097cf411da35df2 ] Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c | 7

From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> [ Upstream commit a5176a4cb85bb6213daadf691097cf411da35df2 ] Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/falcon.c | 7

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> There are a few statements that are indented incorrectly. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/msgqueue.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/msgqueue.c

So now I'm to looking to implement NVDec and as far as I know the game submits a series of commands to the service. This commands are processed by Falcon and then it does its magic. Do you guys got any RE on Falcon commands and how they execute different workloads ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Make the msgqueue_0148cdec_acr_func and msgqueue_0148cdec_func static to avoid the following sparse warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/msgqueue_0148cdec.c:230:1: warning: symbol 'msgqueue_0148cdec_acr_func' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/msgqueue_0148cdec.c:241:1: warning: symbol 'msgqueue_0148cdec_func' was not declared.

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> The low-level Falcon bootstrapping callbacks are expected to return 0 on success or a negative error code on failure. However, the implementation on Tegra returns the ID or mask of the Falcons that were bootstrapped on success, thus breaking the calling code, which treats this as failure. Fix this by making sure we only return 0 or a negative

On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here > know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger > than 2TB? > One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a look. Another is to ask one who has the same controller to do the same for you. I am going to play with

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here >> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger >> than 2TB? > > One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a look. Another is to > ask one who has the same controller

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: > > Hi, all. Hey Andy, > > Below is a link to a brief document describing some changes in NVIDIA > Falcon processors ("fuc", in Nouveau-speak, IIUC) We started trying to use your names where we know them a while back. I personally think of "fuc" as short-hand for "falcon

I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger than 2TB? mark