similar to: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/dmem: missing mutex_lock in error path

On 6/13/19 5:49 PM, John Hubbard wrote: > On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote: >> In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before >> calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc(). >> Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> >> --- >> >> I found

In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc() as shown when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled: [ 1294.871933] ===================================== [ 1294.876656] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! [ 1294.881375] 5.2.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted [ 1294.885048] ------------------------------------- [ 1294.889773] test-malloc-vra/6299 is

From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> [ Upstream commit d304654bd79332ace9ac46b9a3d8de60acb15da3 ] In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc() as shown when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled: [ 1294.871933] ===================================== [ 1294.876656] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! [ 1294.881375]

On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote: > In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before > calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc(). > Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page. > > Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> > --- > > I found this while testing Jason Gunthorpe's hmm tree but this is >

In nouveau_dmem_init(), a number of struct nouveau_dmem_chunk are allocated and put on the dmem->chunk_empty list. Then in nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), a nouveau_dmem_chunk is removed from the list and GPU memory is allocated. However, the nouveau_dmem_chunk is never removed from the chunk_empty list nor placed on the chunk_free or chunk_full lists. This results in only one chunk ever being

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:11:21PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > In nouveau_dmem_pages_alloc(), the drm->dmem->mutex is unlocked before > calling nouveau_dmem_chunk_alloc(). > Reacquire the lock before continuing to the next page. > > Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> > --- > > I found this while testing Jason Gunthorpe's hmm tree

Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason, below is a series against the hmm tree which starts revamping the migrate_vma functionality. The prime idea is to export three slightly lower level functions and thus avoid the need for migrate_vma_ops callbacks. Diffstat: 5 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 607 deletions(-) A git tree is also available at: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git

Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason, below is a series against the hmm tree which starts revamping the migrate_vma functionality. The prime idea is to export three slightly lower level functions and thus avoid the need for migrate_vma_ops callbacks. Diffstat: 4 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 602 deletions(-) A git tree is also available at: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git

Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason, below is a series against the hmm tree which starts revamping the migrate_vma functionality. The prime idea is to export three slightly lower level functions and thus avoid the need for migrate_vma_ops callbacks. Diffstat: 7 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 614 deletions(-) A git tree is also available at: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git

The hmm_devmem_add() function doesn't return NULL, it returns error pointers. Fixes: 5be73b690875 ("drm/nouveau/dmem: device memory helpers for SVM") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c

Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c: In function 'nouveau_dmem_free': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c:103:22: warning: variable 'drm' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] struct nouveau_drm *drm; ^ Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing at huawei.com> ---

Fix call to nouveau_fence_emit() with wrong channel parameter. Fixes: 7f2a0b50b2b2 ("drm/nouveau: fence: separate fence alloc and emit") Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c

On 6/14/19 10:39 AM, Ralph Campbell wrote: > On 6/13/19 5:49 PM, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 6/13/19 5:11 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote: ... >> Actually, the pre-existing code is a little concerning. Your change preserves >> the behavior, but it seems questionable to be doing a "return 0" (whether >> via the above break, or your change) when it's in this partially

The kcalloc() in nouveau_dmem_evict_chunk() will return null if the physical memory has run out. As a result, if we dereference src_pfns, dst_pfns or dma_addrs, the null pointer dereference bugs will happen. Moreover, the GPU is going away. If the kcalloc() fails, we could not evict all pages mapping a chunk. So this patch adds a __GFP_NOFAIL flag in kcalloc(). Finally, as there is no need to

Hi, just for your information and maybe for some help: with 5.1rc1 and SVM enabled i see the following backtrace [1] when the nouveau card (reverse prime) goes to sleep, for now i have papered over with [2] which leaves me with userspace hangs. Any pointers where to look for the actual culprit? PS: Card is: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP106 (136000a1) Greetings, Tobias [1]: BUG: unable

On 3/16/20 10:52 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > No driver has actually used properly wire up and support this feature. > There is various code related to it in nouveau, but as far as I can tell > it never actually got turned on, and the only changes since the initial > commit are global cleanups. This is not actually true. OpenCL 2.x does support SVM with nouveau and device private

These patches apply to linux-5.8.0-rc1. Patches 1-3 should probably go into 5.8, the others can be queued for 5.9. Patches 4-6 improve the HMM self tests. Patch 7-8 prepare nouveau for the meat of this series which adds support and testing for compound page mapping of system memory (patches 9-11) and compound page migration to device private memory (patches 12-16). Since these changes are split

This series adds support for transparent huge page migration to migrate_vma_*() and adds nouveau SVM and HMM selftests as consumers. Earlier versions were posted previously [1] and [2]. The patches apply cleanly to the linux-mm 5.10.0-rc2 tree. There are a lot of other THP patches being posted. I don't think there are any semantic conflicts but there may be some merge conflicts depending on

This series adds support for transparent huge page migration to migrate_vma_*() and adds nouveau SVM and HMM selftests as consumers. An earlier version was posted previously [1]. This version now supports splitting a THP midway in the migration process which led to a number of changes. The patches apply cleanly to the current linux-mm tree. Since there are a couple of patches in linux-mm from Dan

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:59:14PM +0100, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi, > > just for your information and maybe for some help: with 5.1rc1 and SVM > enabled i see the following backtrace [1] when the nouveau card (reverse > prime) goes to sleep, for now i have papered over with [2] which leaves me > with userspace hangs. Any pointers where to look for the actual culprit? >