similar to: [PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/

Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy way [1]. To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation consistent, and finally get rid of the gross hacks. Having whitespaces after -I does not matter since commit

Hi. On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:37 PM Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote: > > Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy > way [1]. > > To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to > the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in > that way, but not all. The goal of this

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:32:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy > way [1]. > > To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to > the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in > that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation >

Hi Dave, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 11:19 AM > To: Yamada, Masahiro/山田 真弘 <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>; > dri-devel <dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; nouveau > <nouveau at

Many Makefiles needed to add -Iinclude/drm as an include path, but the right thing to do is to include headers in the form #include <drm/.../*.h> This series fixes the source files, then rip off -Iinclude/drm flags. V3: rebased on commit bb2af9bda33 (drm-misc-next) Masahiro Yamada (16): drm/vc4: fix include notation and remove -Iinclude/drm flag drm/virtio: fix include notation and

Many Makefiles needed to add -Iinclude/drm as an include path, but the right thing to do is to include headers in the form #include <drm/.../*.h> This series fixes the source files, then rip off -Iinclude/drm flags. V3: rebased on commit bb2af9bda33 (drm-misc-next) Masahiro Yamada (16): drm/vc4: fix include notation and remove -Iinclude/drm flag drm/virtio: fix include notation and

After long term efforts of fixing non-common clock implementations, clk_disable() is a no-op for a NULL pointer input, and this is now tree-wide consistent. All clock consumers can safely call clk_disable(_unprepare) without NULL pointer check. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 15 +++++----------

This series reverts the in-kernel workarounds for inlining issues. The commit description of 77b0bf55bc67 mentioned "We also hope that GCC will eventually get fixed,..." Now, GCC provides a solution. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html explains the new "asm inline" syntax. The performance issue will be eventually solved. [About Code cleanups] I know Nadam

This series reverts the in-kernel workarounds for inlining issues. The commit description of 77b0bf55bc67 mentioned "We also hope that GCC will eventually get fixed,..." Now, GCC provides a solution. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html explains the new "asm inline" syntax. The performance issue will be eventually solved. [About Code cleanups] I know Nadam

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:55:17PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > The <linux/bug.h> was removed from radix-tree.h by the following commit: > f5bba9d11a256ad2a1c2f8e7fc6aabe6416b7890. > > Since that commit, tools/testing/radix-tree/ couldn't pass compilation > due to: tools/testing/radix-tree/idr.c:17: undefined reference to > WARN_ON_ONCE. This patch adds the bug.h header to

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:55:17PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > The <linux/bug.h> was removed from radix-tree.h by the following commit: > f5bba9d11a256ad2a1c2f8e7fc6aabe6416b7890. > > Since that commit, tools/testing/radix-tree/ couldn't pass compilation > due to: tools/testing/radix-tree/idr.c:17: undefined reference to > WARN_ON_ONCE. This patch adds the bug.h header to

Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The

Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The

Hi all, This is version three of the patches I previously posted here: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630173734.14057-1-will at kernel.org Changes since v2 include: * Actually add the barrier in READ_ONCE() for Alpha! * Implement Alpha's smp_load_acquire() using __READ_ONCE(), rather than the other

It's dead code because this is now handled in the core. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Ben

Hi, This To field was not correct indexed by FTS. To: Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com>,=?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjJAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user2 at example.com>, =?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjNAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user3 at example.com>, user4 desu <user4 at example.com> --> Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com> , user2 at example.com And follow was correct indexed by FTS To: Yamada

Hi. On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:14 AM Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 11:07:46AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 03:53:26PM +0000, Michael Matz wrote: > > > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > >

Hi. On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:14 AM Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 11:07:46AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 03:53:26PM +0000, Michael Matz wrote: > > > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > >

Hello, For my backend, I define and use a CC register similiarly to the EFLAGS register in X86 (I call it CCFLAGS). But if I make all arithmetic/logic instructions affect it ('let Defs = [CCFLAGS] in...' in InstrInfo.td) I run into // The only case we should have a dead physreg here without a killing or // instruction where we know it's dead is if it is live-in to the function

A physical register cannot be live across the block. So it must have a use in the block or it must be marked dead. From your dump, it looks like the CCFLAGS defs are not being marked dead. It's unclear where things went wrong, but you can step through LiveVariables to debug this. Evan On Jan 9, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Christian Sayer wrote: > Hello, > > For my backend, I define and