similar to: [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/dp_mst: Introduce drm_dp_mst_connector_atomic_check()

Currently the way that we prevent userspace from performing new modesets on MST connectors that have just been destroyed is rather broken. There's nothing in the actual DRM DP MST topology helpers that checks whether or not a connector still exists, instead each DRM driver does this on it's own, usually by returning NULL from the best_encoder callback which in turn, causes the atomic

Hello, I don't think you can update the loop index variable in list_for_each_entry, because the mcro uses th index variable to get to the next element. Perhaps list_for_each_entry_safe would be more suitable? julia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 04:30:13 +0800 From: kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com> To: kbuild at 01.org Cc: Julia Lawall

Hook this into amdgpu's atomic check for their connectors so they never get modesets on no-longer-present MST connectors. We'll also expand on this later once we add DP MST fallback retraining support. As well, turns out that the only atomic DRM driver without the ->best_encoder() bug is amdgpu. Congrats AMD! Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> ---

On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 09:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:44:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 20:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > We could do this the other way around so it looks like this maybe > > > > struct kref; /* manages kfree() */ > > struct topology_kref; /* corresonds to lifetime in topology

Hook this into amdgpu's atomic check for their connectors so they never get modesets on no-longer-present MST connectors. We'll also expand on this later once we add DP MST fallback retraining support. As well, turns out that the only atomic DRM driver without the ->best_encoder() bug is amdgpu. Congrats AMD! Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> ---

Currently, i915 appears to rely on blocking modesets on no-longer-present MSTB ports by simply returning NULL for ->best_encoder(), which in turn causes any new atomic commits that don't disable the CRTC to fail. This is wrong however, since we still want to allow userspace to disable CRTCs on no-longer-present MSTB ports by changing the DPMS state to off and this still requires that we

Currently, i915 appears to rely on blocking modesets on no-longer-present MSTB ports by simply returning NULL for ->best_encoder(), which in turn causes any new atomic commits that don't disable the CRTC to fail. This is wrong however, since we still want to allow userspace to disable CRTCs on no-longer-present MSTB ports by changing the DPMS state to off and this still requires that we

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 20:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:48:59PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > > There has been a TODO waiting

This is the final portion of the large series for adding MST suspend/resume reprobing that I've been working on for quite a while now. In addition, I: * Refactored and cleaned up any code I ended up digging through in the process of understanding how some parts of these helpers worked. * Added some debugging tools along the way that I ended up needing to figure out some issues in my own

This is the large series for adding MST suspend/resume reprobing that I've been working on for quite a while now. In addition, I: - Refactored and cleaned up any code I ended up digging through in the process of understanding how some parts of these helpers worked. - Added some debugging tools along the way that I ended up needing to figure out some issues in my own code Note that

As mentioned in the previous commit, we currently prevent new modesets on recently-removed MST connectors by returning no encoder from our ->best_encoder() callback once the MST port has disappeared. This is wrong however, because it prevents legacy modesetting users from being able to disable CRTCs on MST connectors after the connector's respective topology has disappeared. So, fix this

As mentioned in the previous commit, we currently prevent new modesets on recently-removed MST connectors by returning no encoder from our ->best_encoder() callback once the MST port has disappeared. This is wrong however, because it prevents legacy modesetting users from being able to disable CRTCs on MST connectors after the connector's respective topology has disappeared. So, fix this

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the > fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been > removed from any ports in the topology. Since iterating downwards in the > topology requires that we hold &mgr->lock, destroying MSTBs from this > context would

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ Still no functional changes, just removing a duplicate s-b to make CI happy. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a