Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "[Bug 107729] Nouveau gr BUG"
2019 Dec 04
0
[Bug 107729] Nouveau gr BUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107729
Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |MOVED
--- Comment #3 from Martin Peres
2016 Apr 06
4
[Bug 94844] New: Ditching xf86-video-nouveau in favor of xf86-video-modesetting?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94844
Bug ID: 94844
Summary: Ditching xf86-video-nouveau in favor of
xf86-video-modesetting?
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
2015 Jul 07
2
RFC: drop glamor from nouveau ddx
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
>> in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
>> core GL contexts, and probably lots of other
2009 Apr 03
1
[Nouveau-cvs] xf86-video-nv: Branch 'master'
You need these ports for LVDS?
Because i know these ports are correct for dvi and friends.
So if you changed them for lvds, we need to seperate port 4 and 5 into
lvds and non-lvds.
Maarten.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Ben Skeggs
<darktama at kemper.freedesktop.org> wrote:
> ?src/nv50reg.h | ? ?4 ++--
> ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
>
2016 Nov 13
0
Atomic modesetting + DisplayPort MST
Hello Ben,
You can find below my results; there is a slight over-representation of 1st gen
Tesla cards, but… that’s what I have. :-D No regressions observed, apart from:
* screen rotation on G80, MCP79
* resuming on G86
I’ll retest those cards with your linux-4.10 branch but without the atomic + DP
serie.
Pierre
Tested: linux-4.10 (HEAD at b27add13f "drm/nouveau/fifo/gf100-: protect
2018 Aug 28
0
[Bug 107729] Nouveau gr BUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107729
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|DRI |xorg
Version|XOrg git |unspecified
Assignee|dri-devel at
2015 Sep 03
2
[PATCH 2/2] gr/gf100: do not assume a PMU is present
On 3 September 2015 at 17:11, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2015 at 16:32, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>> Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
>>> such cases.
>>>
>>>
2009 Sep 03
4
[Bug 23672] New: Nouveau KMS fails with error: Failed to fence channel 0
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23672
Summary: Nouveau KMS fails with error: Failed to fence channel 0
Product: xorg
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2013 Sep 04
0
[PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau: use MSI interrupts
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 15:36 +1000 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ilia Mirkin
2013 Aug 30
0
[PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau: use MSI interrupts
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at
2018 Feb 07
0
nouveau 30bpp / deep color status
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 06:50:45PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> In case anyone's curious about 30bpp framebuffer support, here's the
> current status:
>
> Kernel:
>
> Ben and I have switched the code to using a 256-based LUT for Kepler+,
> and I've also written a patch to cause the addfb ioctl to use the
> proper format. You can pick this up at:
>
>
2019 Feb 17
0
[PATCH] gr/gf100-: correctly expose fecs methods for ctxsw start and stop
Allow fecs to potentially set both methods:
- 0x38 STOP_CTXSW
- 0x39 START_CTXSW
At present the code only ever starts context swap, and never pauses it
as appears to be the intent of one caller of gf100_gr_fecs_ctrl_ctxs().
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Fixes: 2642e0b5 ("gr/gf100-: expose fecs methods for pausing ctxsw")
Signed-off-by: Rhys Kidd <rhyskidd at
2009 Sep 14
1
[Nouveau-cvs] xf86-video-nv: Branch 'master'
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
darktama at kemper.freedesktop.org (Ben Skeggs) wrote:
> src/drmmode_display.c | 6 ++++++
> src/nv_driver.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> New commits:
> commit 6c045fc44783454180d7b3d00b5f25436bd5544e
> Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
> Date: Mon Sep 14 13:04:12 2009 +1000
>
2018 Mar 05
0
nouveau 30bpp / deep color status
On 02/05/2018 12:50 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> In case anyone's curious about 30bpp framebuffer support, here's the
> current status:
>
> Kernel:
>
> Ben and I have switched the code to using a 256-based LUT for Kepler+,
> and I've also written a patch to cause the addfb ioctl to use the
> proper format. You can pick this up at:
>
>
2013 Sep 30
1
[PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau: use MSI interrupts
On 09/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de> wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 15:36 +1000 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
2018 Mar 08
0
nouveau 30bpp / deep color status
Cc'ing mesa-dev, which was left out.
On 03/05/2018 01:40 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Mario Kleiner
> <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02/05/2018 12:50 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> In case anyone's curious about 30bpp framebuffer support, here's the
>>> current status:
>>>
>>>
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 356/542] drm/nouveau/gr/gk20a, gm200-: add terminators to method lists read from fw
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7adc77aa0e11f25b0e762859219c70852cd8d56f ]
Method init is typically ordered by class in the FW image as ThreeD,
TwoD, Compute.
Due to a bug in parsing the FW into our internal format, we've been
accidentally sending Twod + Compute methods to the ThreeD class, as
well as Compute methods to the TwoD class - oops.
Signed-off-by:
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 310/459] drm/nouveau/gr/gk20a, gm200-: add terminators to method lists read from fw
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7adc77aa0e11f25b0e762859219c70852cd8d56f ]
Method init is typically ordered by class in the FW image as ThreeD,
TwoD, Compute.
Due to a bug in parsing the FW into our internal format, we've been
accidentally sending Twod + Compute methods to the ThreeD class, as
well as Compute methods to the TwoD class - oops.
Signed-off-by:
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 169/252] drm/nouveau/gr/gk20a, gm200-: add terminators to method lists read from fw
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7adc77aa0e11f25b0e762859219c70852cd8d56f ]
Method init is typically ordered by class in the FW image as ThreeD,
TwoD, Compute.
Due to a bug in parsing the FW into our internal format, we've been
accidentally sending Twod + Compute methods to the ThreeD class, as
well as Compute methods to the TwoD class - oops.
Signed-off-by:
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 126/186] drm/nouveau/gr/gk20a, gm200-: add terminators to method lists read from fw
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7adc77aa0e11f25b0e762859219c70852cd8d56f ]
Method init is typically ordered by class in the FW image as ThreeD,
TwoD, Compute.
Due to a bug in parsing the FW into our internal format, we've been
accidentally sending Twod + Compute methods to the ThreeD class, as
well as Compute methods to the TwoD class - oops.
Signed-off-by: