similar to: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Add missing fb SLCG registers for kepler2

Same as the previous patch, but for Kepler2 now Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/fb.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 8 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gk110.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/Kbuild | 1 +

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > Same as the previous patch, but for Kepler2 now > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/fb.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 8 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gk110.c | 62

Hello Paul I have a GTX 480 (GF100 I believe) at home in an old machine. Is the rest of the Fermi patch set available somewhere for me to test? Thank you Regards Brock On 16 Jan. 2018 9:08 am, "Lyude Paul" <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: It's here! After a lot of investigation, rewrites, and traces, I present the patch series to implement all known )levels of clockgating for

It's here! After a lot of investigation, rewrites, and traces, I present the patch series to implement all known levels of clockgating for Kepler1 and Kepler2 GPUs. Starting with Fermi GPUs (this is probably present on earlier GPUs as well, but with a far less easy to manage interface), nvidia added two clockgating levels that are handled mostly in firmware (with the exception of course, of

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ Some small changes (shouldn't change anything functionally): - Made gf100_therm_new, gk104_clkgate_pack, and gk110_fb_clkgate_blcg_init_unk_0 static (re: kbuild test bot) - Making all three of

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ Some minor changes: - Clarified that SLCG stands for 'secondary level clockgating', thanks for the small tip nvidia! - Removed the concept of levels, this was more useful for debugging then

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ One small change: - Set therm->clkgate_enabled to false until the last patch, where we introduce the NvPmEnableGating option Lyude Paul (5): drm/nouveau: Add support for basic clockgating on

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ One small change: - Add Martin's R-B, whoops Lyude Paul (5): drm/nouveau: Add support for basic clockgating on Kepler1 drm/nouveau: Add support for BLCG on Kepler1 drm/nouveau: Add support for

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ Some very important changes: - Fix gf100_clkgate_init() to actually write registers! This got broken in the last version by accident - Dump the register packs and the resulting register writes into

This enables BLCG optimization for kepler1. When using clockgating, nvidia's firmware has a set of registers which are initially programmed by the vbios with various engine delays and other mysterious settings that are safe enough to bring up the GPU. However, the values used by the vbios are more power hungry then they need to be, so the nvidia driver writes it's own more optimized set of

2016-01-03 19:32 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Csányi Pál <csanyipal at gmail.com> wrote: >> I want to use nouveau driver in the future too. >> >> So I'm in doubt in that that whether to buy >> GeForce GT730 >> So, does nouveau support these cards? >> >> Should I choose GTX 750 Ti or

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> The recently introduced clock gate support breaks on Tegra chips because no thermal support is enabled for those devices. Conditionalize the code on the existence of thermal support to fix this. Fixes: b138eca661cc ("drm/nouveau: Add support for basic clockgating on Kepler1") Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> Cc: Lyude

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain > temperatures, but continued to report temperatures in 1 degree Celsius > increments via nvkm_therm_temp_get(). > > Rather than altering

I'm hitting a strange pointer aliasing "bug". Here is a test case : /* SOURCE CODE */ #define little_list_size 8 class LittleList1 { public: int _length; double _data[ little_list_size ]; LittleList1( int length ) { _length = length; for( int i=0; i<length; i++ ) _data[i] = 0; } }; class LittleList2 { public: int _length; double _data[ little_list_size ];

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:06 AM Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 06:50, Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of > > new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain > > temperatures, but continued to report

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure > negative temperatures. Some implementations of temp_get() correctly > clamp negative temperature readings to 0 so that users do not mistake > them for

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > > > temperature. However, the thermal

this series fixes the PMU on falcons v5 which fixes memory recklocking on kepler2 and would also allow us to enable memory recklocking on maxwell Karol Herbst (4): pmu/fuc: fix imm32 for gk208+ pmu/fuc: replace mov+sethi with imm32 pmu/fuc: use the call macro instead of using the call instruction directly pmu/fuc: use imm32 in ld/st macros

The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure negative temperatures. Some implementations of temp_get() correctly clamp negative temperature readings to 0 so that users do not mistake them for errors, but some, like gp100_temp_get(), do not. Rather than relying on implementations remembering to clamp values,

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > > temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure > > negative temperatures. Some implementations of