similar to: [Bug 105319] New: DRM: EVO timeout with kernel 4.15.x

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 07:38 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:59:29 +0000 > Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > > wrote: > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > > > Debian 8 ? 9? > > > DC's samba version ? > > >

On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:43 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I managed to compile 4.10.0 under CentOS 7.6. I did the following: > > I'll put muney down that you did not get it working as a full domain > controller.

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 16:52 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:40:11 -0400 (EDT) > "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi Sergio, > > > > You're right and I hadn't noticed because everything worked fine. > > Here's an exercept from samba's config.log (I just refreshed the

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

I have OpenSSL forgenrate the CA root file in my server and work fine. My question is, ?howto i say to Samba (configuration) for work with CA certificates? . I dont find information about this. Thanks. Saludos. --- Miguel El mar., 10 nov. 2020 a las 15:22, S?rgio Basto (<sergio at serjux.com>) escribi?: > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 14:48 -0300, Miguel Angel Coa M. via samba wrote: >

On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Debian 8 ? 9? > DC's samba version ? > > Can you post your smb.conf and resolv.conf > > If you check with (per server what is the outcome. ) > samba-tool dbcheck > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-nc > > You could do a forced sync of a good server to the bad one. >

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.10 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 How do you build this on

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:29:19 +0100 Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > My experience was : > > 1. Mit kbr doesn't support it, we need to use the old kbr system. Do not use MIT, it is, at best, experimental. > 2. We need disable selinux , selinux permissive is not enough to allow > to write on shared folder sysvol. it cause crashes on windows.

> If you build Samba on your with Heimdal on your own, then is it works with > older GnuTLS versions. However I wouldn't run Samba AD DC with Heimdal, the > Samba copy is from 2011. Who knows what's in there ... > > Best regards, > > Andreas WOW! If Samba with Heimdal can't be trusted, and Samba with MIT is clearly experimental and not supported, then WHAT

Mandi! Sérgio Basto via samba In chel di` si favelave... > As far as I can tell and in my experience the replications methods that > we find in wiki fail in be bi-directional. So to workaround we may > force just write POL(s) in just one DC and sync it to the other. AFAIK gpedit just write to the DC with FSMO role by default.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70972 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau fails with broken screen on nv40 with kernel 3.12 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105174 Bug ID: 105174 Summary: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

2 debian-DCs ... I get Last attempt @ Wed Mar 13 10:57:11 2019 CET failed, result 121 (WERR_SEM_TIMEOUT) How to proceed here (yes, I google ...), please ...

El 17 de junio de 2020 22:29:33 GMT-04:00, "S?rgio Basto" <sergio at serjux.com> escribi?: >On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 22:03 -0400, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba >wrote: >> Hello all; >> sorry almost the offtopic. >> >> I want to upgrade to samba-4.12.3.tar.gz on CentOS 7 and has problem >> installing gnutls. >> As said in wiki, to

Hai, Did you set in the GPO (computer policy) Under System\Logon, "Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon" = Enabled" If its a script, also add these. "Configure Network Options preference extension policy processing" is "Enabled" "Configure Logon Script Delay" = Enabled and set to 0 And, after setting the GPO, reboot 2 x !

Hi, I've Samba 4.11 running over Centos 7.x. I need setting Samba with certificate authority CA (similar to Windows Active Directory Certificate Services) ?is possible? . I found info about ssleay but y to old . Thanks. Saludos. --- Miguel.

Hi, Does Samba-AD support TLS 1.2 for LDAPS? If yes, can some one give more details on its configuration? Regards, Ananth

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104835 Bug ID: 104835 Summary: MMIO read of 00000000 FAULT at 10ac08 [ IBUS ] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau