Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[PATCH] bl: fix backlight regression"
2018 Feb 19
1
[PATCH v2] bl: fix backlight regression
fixes d9c0aadc5aa241df26ce8301d34a8418919fb5ae
Suggested-by: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com>
---
drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c
index 380f3402..55172655 100644
---
2019 Dec 06
2
[PATCH] drm/dp_mst: add missed nv50_outp_release in nv50_msto_disable
nv50_msto_disable() does not call nv50_outp_release() to match
nv50_outp_acquire() like other disable().
Add the missed call to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96 at gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
index
2016 Dec 07
0
[PATCH v4 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name,
nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already
existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the
second interface will be named nv_backlight1, and so on.
Bugzilla:
2016 Nov 14
0
[PATCH v3 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:57:06PM +0100, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> From: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr>
>
> Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name,
> nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already
> existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
> the initial name as
2019 Dec 12
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/dispnv50: add missed nv50_outp_release in nv50_msto_disable
nv50_msto_disable() does not call nv50_outp_release() to match
nv50_outp_acquire() like other disable().
Add the missed call to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96 at gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix the subject prefix.
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
2019 Dec 12
0
[PATCH] drm/dp_mst: add missed nv50_outp_release in nv50_msto_disable
On Fri, 06 Dec 2019, Chuhong Yuan <hslester96 at gmail.com> wrote:
> nv50_msto_disable() does not call nv50_outp_release() to match
> nv50_outp_acquire() like other disable().
> Add the missed call to fix it.
The subject prefix "drm/dp_mst" implies drm core change, but this is
about nouveau. Please fix.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96 at
2016 Nov 13
1
[PATCH v3 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
From: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr>
Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name,
nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already
existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the
second interface will be named
2020 Nov 14
0
[PATCH 2/8] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Remove (nv_encoder->crtc) checks in ->disable callbacks
Noticed these in both the disable (which we'll be getting rid of in a
moment) and the atomic disable callbacks: both callback types check whether
or not there's actually a CRTC assigned to the given encoder. However, as
->atomic_disable and ->disable will never be called without a CRTC assigned
to the given encoder there's no point in this check. So just remove it.
2016 Apr 15
11
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name,
nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already
existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the
second interface will be named nv_backlight1, and so on.
Fixes: fdo#86539
Signed-off-by:
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v2 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Made
some important changes to the refactoring patch, but everything else is
the same.
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau: s/nouveau_backlight_exit/nouveau_backlight_fini/
drm/nouveau: Cleanup indenting in
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v3 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Added
NV_INFO_ONCE and made "Move backlight device into nouveau_connector" use
that instead so we don't print the GMUX warning more then once.
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2018 Aug 23
6
[PATCH 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
This series fixes some issues with nouveau's backlight support that were
causing kernel panics on module reloads, specifically on systems with
nouveau handling the backlight of one of the displays.
While we're at it, let's cleanup nouveau_backlight.c as well
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into
2018 Aug 29
6
[PATCH RESEND v3 0/6] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Forgot to send 6 patches instead of five since there's one new one now,
whoops!
No actual changes, next version of
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/
Lyude Paul (6):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2018 Sep 06
7
[PATCH v4 0/6] Backlight fixes and cleanup
Refactor for Ben, hopefully this time this should apply to his tree.
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/
No changes otherwise.
Lyude Paul (6):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2020 Jan 17
1
[PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: remove set but not unused variable 'nv_connector'
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function nv50_pior_enable:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1672:28: warning:
variable nv_connector set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
commit ac2d9275f371 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Store the
bpc we're using in nv50_head_atom") left behind this.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci at huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
2019 Sep 13
2
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
[ Upstream commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 ]
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: f479c0ba4a17
2016 Apr 15
0
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote:
> Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name,
> nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already
> existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
> the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking
2019 Jan 28
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: f479c0ba4a17 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: initial support for DP 1.2
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 070/167] drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
From: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 ]
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
2019 Sep 13
0
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
Hi Greg,
This feels like it's missing a From: line.
commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093
Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500
drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
Is this an artifact of your notification-of-patches process and I
never noticed before, or was the patch ingested incorrectly?
Cheers,
-ilia