similar to: [Bug 103284] New: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference on 4.13.0-1-sparc64-smp

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[Bug 103284] New: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference on 4.13.0-1-sparc64-smp"

2020 Sep 22
2
[Announce] Samba 4.13.0 Available for Download
Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. ZeroLogon ========= Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue. For details please see
2020 Sep 22
2
[Announce] Samba 4.13.0 Available for Download
Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. ZeroLogon ========= Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue. For details please see
2008 Jul 29
1
[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---
2008 Jun 03
0
[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---
2012 Apr 08
0
[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - cleaning the
2013 Nov 20
1
[releng_10 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the
2004 Mar 19
0
nmbd won't bind on FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE sparc64
Hi, I have had samba 3.0 running on my FreeBSD 5.2 sparc64 system for a few weeks without any issues. Recently I had to reboot, and now nmbd won't run. I have NOT changed my config one bit. I have verified nothing is bound to port 137 via netstat -an . The error is as follows: [2004/03/19 05:20:10, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(646) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr =
2007 Apr 25
1
ldd rubyeventmachine.so, sparc64, openbsd4.0
sorry to start a new thread. didnt know how to continue the other one i started. $ ldd rubyeventmachine.so rubyeventmachine.so: rubyeventmachine.so: Exec format error rubyeventmachine.so: exit status 1 dont mean to waste your time, just been asked on irc whether i''ve had a look into eventmachine and i mentioned that it did not compile properly on my box. so if this is too much of a
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Bridging on Sparc64
Using Kernel 2.4.25 and bridge-utils64, I still can not get bridging working on the Sparc64 platform. Is anyone interested in helping me figure out what's wrong? If so, what can I do? Would I have better luck using 2.6.X? Any comments would be greatly appreciated. <> Jim
2000 Jul 07
0
sparc64 vs i386 memory usage
I have an R function that uses a shared library written in C. The memory allocation is done using calloc and free (I tried using R_alloc, but although it would compile, R would crash... is there a FAQ with more info on R_alloc? I couldn't find an answer in the documentation...). There are no memory leaks in my C code (i have triple checked). The code also uses the coxph function from
2011 Nov 23
1
nouveau on Linux/sparc64 -- almost!
Hey all, First off, I'd like to say many thanks to the nouveau developers! I've got a Sun Ultra 10 running Debian 6 (testing branch) with an onboard ATI card and a PCI GeForceMX 4000. So far X works fine on the ATI card, but I noticed that the DRM driver for the GF4 has a few unaligned accesses in it (see log). I can actually start X using that card, but all I get is a black screen
2005 Dec 28
0
[patch] sparc64 fix stat()
From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org> I've investigated the sparc stat() klibc problem a bit and found that the definition of 'struct stat' in klibc's include/arch/sparc64/archstat.h is (most probably) incorrect. I've written a simple test case using stat() function and then looked at preprocessed source, which includes the 'struct stat' definition (from glibc
2006 Feb 19
2
[patch] statfs64 sparc64 fix
From: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@spring.luon.net> It seems that klibc uses __sparc64__ to determine if it's compiled in 64 bit mode on sparc, unfortunatly gcc doesn't define __sparc64__ :) It does define __arch64__ though. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> --- klibc-1.2.2.orig/include/sys/vfs.h 2006-02-15 18:32:10.000000000 +0100 +++
2006 May 24
0
klibc kernel tree merged with 2.6.17-rc5; sparc64 changes in
I have finished the work of transmitting sparc64 ROM parameters to kinit via the file /arch.cmd in rootfs. The result is pretty nice, as it gives a clean interface for any other architectures which want to collect architecture-specific options at initialization time. I have also merged my tree with v2.6.17-rc5, although it was a completely orthogonal merge set. The following issues are
2014 Jan 15
0
[PATCH stable-only] virtio-net: fix build on m68k and sparc64
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct > page *. But this does not happen on architectures where page_address is > a macro, the result is build failure as the macro tries to dereference >
2014 Jan 15
0
[PATCH stable-only] virtio-net: fix build on m68k and sparc64
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * >> > to page_address, assuming that it will get
2003 Jan 27
0
[Bug 11] ip6_tables doesn't work on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OS/Version| |All Platform| |All
2003 Feb 03
0
[Bug 41] New: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64 structures/padding/maskcomp bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 Summary: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64 structures/padding/maskcomp bug Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: connection
2003 Mar 03
0
[Bug 59] New: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Summary: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:
2003 May 23
0
[Bug 11] ip6_tables doesn't work on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From