Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[Bug 103284] New: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference on 4.13.0-1-sparc64-smp"
2020 Sep 22
2
[Announce] Samba 4.13.0 Available for Download
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series.
Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading.
ZeroLogon
=========
Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all
Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue.
For details please see
2020 Sep 22
2
[Announce] Samba 4.13.0 Available for Download
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series.
Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading.
ZeroLogon
=========
Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all
Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue.
For details please see
2008 Jul 29
1
[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile
TB ---
2008 Jun 03
0
[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64/supfile
TB ---
2012 Apr 08
0
[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - cleaning the
2013 Nov 20
1
[releng_10 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the
2004 Mar 19
0
nmbd won't bind on FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE sparc64
Hi,
I have had samba 3.0 running on my FreeBSD 5.2 sparc64 system for
a few weeks without any issues.
Recently I had to reboot, and now nmbd won't run. I have NOT changed
my config one bit.
I have verified nothing is bound to port 137 via netstat -an .
The error is as follows:
[2004/03/19 05:20:10, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(646)
bind failed on port 137 socket_addr =
2007 Apr 25
1
ldd rubyeventmachine.so, sparc64, openbsd4.0
sorry to start a new thread. didnt know how to continue the other one i
started.
$ ldd rubyeventmachine.so
rubyeventmachine.so:
rubyeventmachine.so: Exec format error
rubyeventmachine.so: exit status 1
dont mean to waste your time, just been asked on irc whether i''ve had a
look into eventmachine and i mentioned that it did not compile properly
on my box. so if this is too much of a
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Bridging on Sparc64
Using Kernel 2.4.25 and bridge-utils64, I still can not get bridging working
on the Sparc64 platform.
Is anyone interested in helping me figure out what's wrong? If so, what can
I do?
Would I have better luck using 2.6.X?
Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
<> Jim
2000 Jul 07
0
sparc64 vs i386 memory usage
I have an R function that uses a shared library
written in C. The memory allocation is done using
calloc and free (I tried using R_alloc, but although
it would compile, R would crash... is there a FAQ with
more info on R_alloc? I couldn't find an answer in the
documentation...). There are no memory leaks in my C code
(i have triple checked). The code also uses the coxph
function from
2011 Nov 23
1
nouveau on Linux/sparc64 -- almost!
Hey all,
First off, I'd like to say many thanks to the nouveau developers!
I've got a Sun Ultra 10 running Debian 6 (testing branch) with an
onboard ATI card and a PCI GeForceMX 4000. So far X works fine on the
ATI card, but I noticed that the DRM driver for the GF4 has a few
unaligned accesses in it (see log). I can actually start X using that
card, but all I get is a black screen
2005 Dec 28
0
[patch] sparc64 fix stat()
From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
I've investigated the sparc stat() klibc problem a bit and found that the
definition of 'struct stat' in klibc's include/arch/sparc64/archstat.h is
(most probably) incorrect. I've written a simple test case using stat()
function and then looked at preprocessed source, which includes the
'struct stat' definition (from glibc
2006 Feb 19
2
[patch] statfs64 sparc64 fix
From: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@spring.luon.net>
It seems that klibc uses __sparc64__ to determine if it's compiled in 64
bit mode on sparc, unfortunatly gcc doesn't define __sparc64__ :) It does
define __arch64__ though.
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>
--- klibc-1.2.2.orig/include/sys/vfs.h 2006-02-15 18:32:10.000000000 +0100
+++
2006 May 24
0
klibc kernel tree merged with 2.6.17-rc5; sparc64 changes in
I have finished the work of transmitting sparc64 ROM parameters to kinit
via the file /arch.cmd in rootfs. The result is pretty nice, as it
gives a clean interface for any other architectures which want to
collect architecture-specific options at initialization time.
I have also merged my tree with v2.6.17-rc5, although it was a
completely orthogonal merge set.
The following issues are
2014 Jan 15
0
[PATCH stable-only] virtio-net: fix build on m68k and sparc64
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void *
> to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct
> page *. But this does not happen on architectures where page_address is
> a macro, the result is build failure as the macro tries to dereference
>
2014 Jan 15
0
[PATCH stable-only] virtio-net: fix build on m68k and sparc64
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void *
>> > to page_address, assuming that it will get
2003 Jan 27
0
[Bug 11] ip6_tables doesn't work on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
OS/Version| |All
Platform| |All
2003 Feb 03
0
[Bug 41] New: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64 structures/padding/maskcomp bug
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41
Summary: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64
structures/padding/maskcomp bug
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: patch-o-matic
Platform: sparc64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: connection
2003 Mar 03
0
[Bug 59] New: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59
Summary: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related
connections, FTP
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: sparc64
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
2003 May 23
0
[Bug 11] ip6_tables doesn't work on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From