similar to: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.15

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.15"

2017 Mar 29
0
[PATCH xf86-video-nouveau] Do not register hotplug without RandR
Chris, could you have a look at this since it's allegedly your work in the intel driver and let us know if it's reasonable? I'm definitely not enough of an X driver guy to rule one way or the other. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Mariusz Bialonczyk <manio at skyboo.net> wrote: > When using Xinerama, RandR is automatically disabled, and calling RR > routines will trigger
2017 Mar 29
2
[PATCH xf86-video-nouveau] Do not register hotplug without RandR
When using Xinerama, RandR is automatically disabled, and calling RR routines will trigger an assert() because the RR keys/resources are not set, leading to an Xserver abort. Hotplug makes little sense without RandR, so no need to install a udev monitor if RandR is not available. Ported from intel driver, original work by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> Bugzilla:
2013 Sep 04
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/bios/therm: handle vbioses with duplicate entries (mostly nva5)
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> > > Some vbioses have extra useless entries after "the end" of the table. This is > problematic since all of the vbios I found with this issue redefine the > pwm freq divider to insane levels (52750 Hz instead of 2500), thus breaking
2013 Aug 30
5
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/bios/therm: handle vbioses with duplicate entries (mostly nva5)
From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> Some vbioses have extra useless entries after "the end" of the table. This is problematic since all of the vbios I found with this issue redefine the pwm freq divider to insane levels (52750 Hz instead of 2500), thus breaking fan management. The first solution to solve this mess would be to change the length of the table. The solution
2017 Apr 07
0
[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.78
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, This libdrm-2.4.78 fixes some minor cosmetics, a build issue for GNU/kFreeBSD, and adds a new page_flip_handler2 event handler, which when run on a suitably capable kernel, can provide the CRTC ID to userspace for atomic completion events. Cheers, Daniel Ander Conselvan de Oliveira (1):       Add CRTC ID to vblank event Daniel Stone (2):
2023 Mar 15
0
[ANNOUNCE] libXaw 1.0.15
Xaw is a widget set based on the X Toolkit Intrinsics (Xt) Library. Alan Coopersmith (10): Build xz tarballs instead of bzip2 gitlab CI: add a basic build test Fix spelling/wording issues Stop memory leak in GetResourcePixmapPath() Stop memory leak in error paths in XawTextSinkConvertPropertyList() Remove "All rights reserved" from Oracle copyright
1999 Nov 10
0
Re: undocumented bugs - nfsd
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:39:39AM +0100, Mariusz Marcinkiewicz wrote: > After reading lcamtuf's posts I decided write this one. Few months ago one > of my friends - digit - found bug in linux nfsd daemon. I made example > sploit about IV 1999. Now in distributions is new nfsd and nowhere was > information about security weaknes of old version! Well, one gets used to people
2010 Sep 15
0
[LLVMdev] getAnalysis<LoopInfo> from ModulePass
hi, On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Mariusz Grad <mariusz.grad at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote tiny ModulePass which iterates over functions and then uses getAnalysis<LoopInfo> in order to get informations about the loop. > It compiles smoothly, but whenever I try to run it I got error like this: > opt: .. PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType&
2015 Jun 12
2
1.0.15 gone, can't start version 2
I mean, in the source directory. On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > dovecot. > > On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with:
2015 Jun 12
4
1.0.15 gone, can't start version 2
On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version 1.0.15 with: rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in /usr/local is
2007 Apr 02
0
OCFS 1.0.15-5
Hello, I have an SR raised with Oracle and say they this is fixed in OCFS 1.0.15-5 for redhat 2.1 (e.40). This is no-where to be found on oss.oracle.com and we were given a link to someones home directory with a hidden directory in it http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/.1.0.15-5/ What is the status of this, is it a release - if it's a proper release why is it not listed under the main
2015 Jun 10
0
Error starting 1.0.15 with SSL_DISABLE=No
On 2015-06-10 12:22:45 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote: > When starting Dovecot 1.0.15 after building it from source using the > standard procedure, I receive the following message when starting, > even though SLL_DISABLE=No: > > Error: SSL support not compiled in but ssl_disable=no > Fatal: Invalid configuration in /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf > > How is SSL support configured
2015 Jun 12
0
1.0.15 gone, can't start version 2
Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things dovecot. On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version > 1.0.15 with: > > rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot > > However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and > ready to start testing
2015 Jun 12
0
1.0.15 gone, can't start version 2
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:14:03 +0300, you wrote: >I mean, in the source directory. You mean in the directory where files from the tar were placed? I've unfortunately removed those manually, but then I put them back and tried the make again, still same error. "make: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. >On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at
2010 Sep 16
1
[LLVMdev] Linking shared library
Hi, I have conventional directory structure for a pass taken from project examples. I want to build a tool which makes usage of a shared library which is included in the project. This means that I have library here: # lib/foo/*.cc and after compilation the library is placed here # Debug/lib/libfoo.so My tool is located here: # tool/test_foo # cat tool/Makefile LEVEL = ../ TOOLNAME=test_foo
2010 Mar 05
1
[LLVMdev] How to increase the size of a basic block?
Hi, I am working on Instruction Set Extensions and I am looking for a way to increase the sizes of a basic block. Besides the loop-unrollers is there any code laying around which could be used to that purpose (like superblock formation, hyperblocks, predicate execution ..)? Best regards, Mariusz. -- Mariusz Grad
2012 Nov 19
0
upgrade 1.0.15 -> 2.1.7: MBOX index compatibility and performance
Hi, we just upgraded our mailserver from Dovecot 1.0.15 to Dovecot 2.1.7. We use MBOX format (due to legacy compatibility), system users, PAM+GSSAPI auth, filesystem quotas, and indexes located on a separate filesystem: mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=~/mail/INBOX:INDEX=/var/cache/dovecot/indexes/%16Hu/%u The 2.1.7 configuration files have been rewritten based on default templates
2015 Jun 10
2
Error starting 1.0.15 with SSL_DISABLE=No
When starting Dovecot 1.0.15 after building it from source using the standard procedure, I receive the following message when starting, even though SLL_DISABLE=No: Error: SSL support not compiled in but ssl_disable=no Fatal: Invalid configuration in /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf How is SSL support configured and built in? I know it has something to do with the --SSL_CFLAGS flag.
2011 May 19
1
[Bug 652] pcap plugin problem
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652 Mariusz Kielpinski <kielpi at poczta.onet.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kielpi at poczta.onet.pl Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from
2010 Sep 30
3
Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ??
I've read some of the mailing lists looking for information on this. Thus far, about all I've found is there was a complete rewrite of Dovecot some time back. I'm wondering now is it even possible to use the same mbox's from 0.99.13-3 with version 1.0.15-2? Is there a procedure documented somewhere? Any pointers would be much appreciated. Thanks, Mike -- Let the machine