similar to: [PATCH] nvc0: support for GP10B

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > GK20A is mostly compatible with GK104, but features a new 3D > class. Add it to the relevant header and use it when GK20A is > detected. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- > src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv_object.xml.h | 1 + >

The following 2 patches make it possible to run Mesa programs on GK20A (Tegra K1). GK20A is very similar to GK104, but uses a new (backward-compatible) 3D class as well as the same ISA as GK110 (SM35). Taking these differences into account is sufficient to successfully render simple off-screen buffers. Alexandre Courbot (2): nvc0: add GK20A 3D class nvc0: use SM35 ISA with GK20A

On 05/27/2014 02:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: >> GK20A is mostly compatible with GK104, but features a new 3D >> class. Add it to the relevant header and use it when GK20A is >> detected. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> >> ---

GK20A is mostly compatible with GK104, but features a new 3D class. Add it to the relevant header and use it when GK20A is detected. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv_object.xml.h | 1 + src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 76 ++++++++++++------------- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 22 +++++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 9 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 14 ++--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.c | 4

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 76 ++++++++++++------------- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 22 +++++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 9 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 14 ++--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.c | 4 +-

The main patches are from Christoph. Unfortunately they're a little beyond my understanding of all the vertex-related details, but they generally seemed fine. I'm just going to push these unless someone steps up to review them. Christoph Bumiller (2): nvc0: add support for indirect drawing nvc0: fix translate path for PRIM_RESTART_WITH_DRAW_ARRAYS Ilia Mirkin (1): nouveau: check if

nv30 seems to not support dma objects with offset, so simply extend the query_heap to cover the entire notifier, and use a offset in nv30_context_kick_notify. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 14 +- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_context.h | 5 +

This member is declared, allocated and destroyed, but doesn't seem to be used or referenced anywhere in the code. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- Resending after fixing typo in email address - apologies for the inconvenience. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 3 --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 5

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote: > nv30 seems to not support dma objects with offset, so simply extend the query_heap to cover the > entire notifier, and use a offset in nv30_context_kick_notify. It would be great if you could detail the list of transformations that were done in the commit description, as well as what the

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > GK20A does not have dedicated VRAM, therefore allocating in VRAM can be > sub-optimal and sometimes even harmful. Set its VRAM domain to > NOUVEAU_BO_GART so all objects are allocated in system memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- >

This all seems very roundabout... Can't we do this in a somewhat consistent way with the device being cleaned up in one place or another but not both? On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > The winsys layer would attempt to cleanup the nouveau_device if screen > init failed, however, in

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2015 01:40 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> This all seems very roundabout... Can't we do this in a somewhat >> consistent way with the device being cleaned up in one place or >> another but not both? > That would be lovely, but not possible. It has to be cleaned up by the > pipe

Can you push this to a repo somewhere? I want to see what the final version looks like after all your changes, but it's hard to see that with these patches. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > Adds support for the new TIC layout that's present on Maxwell GPUs, > heavily based on

This series is to allow NVIDIA chips with shared memory to operate more efficiently (and to operate at all once we disable VRAM from the kernel driver) by allowing nouveau_screen to specify a domain to use for objects originally allocated into VRAM. If the domain is not overridden, the default NOUVEAU_BO_VRAM is used. A NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro is then introduced to be used in place of

This series is to allow NVIDIA chips with shared memory to operate more efficiently (and to operate at all once we disable VRAM from the kernel driver) by allowing nouveau_screen to specify a domain to use for objects originally allocated into VRAM. If the domain is not overridden, the default NOUVEAU_BO_VRAM is used. A NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro is then introduced to be used in place of

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Use the newly-introduced NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro to support alternative > VRAM domains for chips that do not use dedicated video memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- > src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 6 ++---- >

This patch-series implements the ARB_viewport_array for nvc0 and does a little house-cleanig afterwords. V2: Add Release-Notes, mark this in GL3 as done for nvc0 Don't mark the scissors dirty when we don't need to do that Tobias Klausmann (3): nvc0: implement multiple viewports/scissors, enable ARB_viewport_array docs: update GL3.txt, relnotes: mark GL_ARB_viewport_array as done

New revision of this patchset that prevents VRAM objects from being allocated on VRAM-less systems like Tegra. This is required for Mesa to work on such systems. Changes since v2: - Use vram_size to detect systems without VRAM and set the correct domain instead of expecting each chip to set its domain explicitly. Alexandre Courbot (2): nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains nvc0: use

This patch-series implements the ARB_viewport_array for nvc0 and does a little house-cleanig afterwords. Tobias Klausmann (3): nvc0: implement multiple viewports/scissors, enable ARB_viewport_array nvc0: mark scissor in nvc0_clear_{} nv50/ir: Remove NV50_SEMANTIC_VIEWPORTINDEX and its last consumer .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_driver.h | 1 -