similar to: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Rename acpi_work to hpd_work

On 11/21/2016 05:50 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > We need to call drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() on resume to properly detect > monitor connection / disconnection on some laptops, use hpd_work for > this to avoid deadlocks. > Hi, this seems to introduce a hang of nouveau in 4.10-rc if the gpu is runtime resumed while no displays are connected at all. I get a permanent hang - need to power

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:17:44PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Various notebooks with nvidia GPUs generate an ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE > acpi-video event when an external device gets plugged in (and again on > modesets on that connector), the default behavior in the acpi-video > driver for this is to send a KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE evdev event, which > causes e.g. gnome-settings-daemon

Various notebooks with nvidia GPUs generate an ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE acpi-video event when an external device gets plugged in (and again on modesets on that connector), the default behavior in the acpi-video driver for this is to send a KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE evdev event, which causes e.g. gnome-settings-daemon to ask us to rescan the connectors (good), but also causes g-s-d to switch to mirror

On 6/8/24 00:09, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > If the card doesn't have display hardware, hpd_work and hpd_lock are > left uninitialized which causes BUG when attempting to schedule hpd_work > on runtime PM resume. > > Fix it by adding headless flag to DRM and skip any hpd if it's set. > > Fixes: ae1aadb1eb8d ("nouveau: don't fail driver load if no display hw

We need to call drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() on resume to properly detect monitor connection / disconnection on some laptops, use hpd_work for this to avoid deadlocks. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c

Currently, there's nothing in nouveau that actually cancels this work struct. So, cancel it on suspend/unload. Otherwise, if we're unlucky enough hpd_work might try to keep running up until the system is suspended. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 9 ++++++---

On 29/5/24 07:52, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > If the card doesn't have display hardware, hpd_work and hpd_lock are > left uninitialized which causes BUG when attempting to schedule hpd_work > on runtime PM resume. Hi, Good catch, thank you for looking at this.? A couple of initial comments below: Ben. > > Fix it by adding headless flag to DRM and skip any hpd if it's

[+cc Hans, author of 0b2fe6594fa2 ("drm/nouveau: Queue hpd_work on (runtime) resume")] On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:30:15AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:25:02PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 16:17 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > On Thu,

On most systems with ACPI hotplugging support, it seems that we always receive a hotplug event once we re-enable EC interrupts even if the GPU hasn't even been resumed yet. This can cause problems since even though we schedule hpd_work to handle connector reprobing for us, hpd_work synchronizes on pm_runtime_get_sync() to wait until the device is ready to perform reprobing. Since runtime

On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 09:17 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Hans, author of 0b2fe6594fa2 ("drm/nouveau: Queue hpd_work on (runtime) > resume")] > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:30:15AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:25:02PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > >

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 02:07:18PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 09:17 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Hans, author of 0b2fe6594fa2 ("drm/nouveau: Queue hpd_work on (runtime) > > resume")] > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:30:15AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c index ec7861457b84..b2a93e3fa67b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@

On the Lenovo P50 I've been working on, ACPI notifications for hotplugs always seem happen even while the GPU has it's hotplugs enabled. This means that we're uselessly scheduling two connector probes every time we get a hotplug. Since we can't unregister the acpi handler without causing userspace to start getting mysterious keypresses from the ACPI_VIDEO_REPROBE events that are

While working on refactoring how we handle connector hotplugging/probing + a bunch of misc DP stuff, I found a bunch of runtime_pm errors that were mostly introduced by me at one point. Oops. A lot of these aren't triggered consistently on a lot of systems, so it's not terribly surprising these got swept under the rug. Lyude Paul (9): drm/nouveau/kms: Handle -EINPROGRESS in

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 13:59 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Not being a scheduled work expert, I was unsure if this experiment was > equivalent to what I proposed. > > I'm always suspicious of singleton solutions like this (using > schedule_work() in runtime_resume()) because usually they seem to be > solving a generic problem that should happen on many kinds of > hardware.

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

[+cc Rafael] On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:25:02PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 16:17 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 18:43 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:02:30PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > On a very specific subset of ThinkPad P50 SKUs, particularly > > > > ones that come with a

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 13:59 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Not being a scheduled work expert, I was unsure if this experiment was > > equivalent to what I proposed. > > > > I'm always suspicious of singleton solutions like this (using > > schedule_work() in runtime_resume()) because usually they

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code