similar to: [Bug 98270] New: Firefox + Google Maps + scroll => EQ overflowing

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Server/General |Driver/nouveau Assignee|xorg-team at lists.x.org |nouveau at lists.freedesktop.o |

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Martin Peres

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38984 Summary: xorg-nouveau: Segfault after gdm3 login, EQ overflowing, GeForce 8600 GT (backtrace attached) Product: xorg Version: 7.6 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48434 Bug #: 48434 Summary: X freezes with "EQ overflowing" Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87819 Bug ID: 87819 Summary: [NVAC] EQ overflowing Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Well me too.. I been following this thread for a week it seems no update on how to fix the update patch problem? I?d to reinstall the game and patch but still don?t work, my last option is reformat but still waiting if there?s easier way on how to solve.

Hi everybody, please, could you give me help ? I scanned the help archives and didn't found hints... I want to solve a large sparse linear system subjected to an inequality constrains (all solutions positive) and an equality constrain (all solutions sum to 1), thus I tried to fool constrOptim using: x[1] + 0 + ... + 0 >= 0 ... 0 + 0 + ... + x[n] >= 0 x[1] + x[2] + ... +

NE and EQ comparisons should be able to commute their operands. But, for ARM at least, this does not seem to be happening. The first sequence below generates CMN (compare negated) but the second does not (complete test attached). These seem to map to ARMcmpNZ. Where would I look to see if that is marked commutative? %nb = sub i32 0, %b %tmp = icmp ne i32 %a, %nb %nb = sub

Attached is a patch to implement an !eq() operator in TableGen. We use this for the AVX specification to allow the user to control what kind of pattern should be used for a particular instruction def. For example, we use it for reg-mem instructions to let the user choose between a built-in generic reg-mem pattern, the same pattern that was used for the reg-reg variant of the instruction or a

On Jan 5, 2010, at 9:59 AM, David Greene wrote: > Attached is a patch to implement an !eq() operator in TableGen. We > use this > for the AVX specification to allow the user to control what kind of > pattern > should be used for a particular instruction def. For example, we > use it for > reg-mem instructions to let the user choose between a built-in > generic

Who can send to me code that can perform in R-plus jacobi.root, scre.eq, cgf.0, cgf.1 and cgf.2 that are part of the S-plus package? Marc D. Brodsky

Anyone know how to esimate parameters in the system: x[k]=Ax[k-1]+ B + Gv[k-1] y[k]=x[k]+Du[k]+Hw[k] a system with exogenous u[k] in the measurement eq., v,w are iid, both eq. are gaussian. Thanks, Oyvind --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello I am stuck. I want Administrator to be "admin user" for Samba share, but I can't achieve that. This is a setup I have : [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = TEST security = domain password server = * wins server = 192.168.202.7 wins support = no name resolve order = wins bcast winbind use default domain =

Hi all I hope anyone can help me with this. I'm trying to get vmware to play along nicely on CentOS 5.1 x64, but I get errors when I try and start a vmx image, or list them. This the the error: [root at backup vmware-mui-distrib]# vmware-cmd -l Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/VMware/VmPerl.pm line 114.

I'm amazed by how low the artifacts are when encoding with Vorbis, but I found problems (Vorbis version 1.00) on equalization (high vs midrange vs low pitches balance) when encoding my benchmark audio track, problems which are hard to go away even at very high bitrates. My benchmark audio track is composed by me and you can find it here http://www.trombettworks.com/drumswork.php in losslessly

Greetings R Users, I have a system of equations for which I would like to output all the R-squares. Assume there are four equations in my system, the only way I found to output all the R-squares is by calling them out one by one as this: summary(fitSUR$eq[[1]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[2]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[3]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[4]])$r.squared But isn't there a

Hello, In one of the loop transformations I am developing, I need to convert eq and neq loop latch condition into less than or greater than depending on the control flow. The problem is that CmpInst::ICMP_EQ and CmpInst::ICMP_NE are neither signed nor unsigned in LLVM. Also, I did not find a way to find out if the integer operands of the CmpInst are signed or unsigned. Apparently, LLVM does

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76818 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76818 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Xorg EQ overflowing lock up QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: max.snow at 4mation.com.au

I''m walking through an example in the "Head First Rails" book, but, instead doing the examples using Rails3.0.0.rc. But, I''m getting this error when browsing for example: http://localhost:3000/advs/1 undefined method `eq'' for nil:NilClass Provided that my advs_controller.rb is as follows: http://pastie.org/private/cd9zntg2ite57ept288kfa Any ideas why

I have a DIV containing a TABLE whose TR elements are Droppable. The DIV has a fixed height and overflow set to auto. The onDrop callback works fine when you drop onto the rows that are initially visible, but if you scroll down and try it with a newly visible row, you get the right behavior with the wrong row. At least, wrong from my point of view (-: It''s like "it" (the