similar to: [PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: add missing header dependencies

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous

We get some warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:265:1:

V2: Always disable DLL reset Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/sddr2.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/sddr2.c diff --git

We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are declared in

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/gddr3.c diff --git

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by > e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly > intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from > everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to,

This will allow the nouveau module to only include support for nv04-nv50, nv50-nvc0, nvc0+ cards individually (or in any combination). Only compiling one of the card types at a time reduces the size of the nouveau module, from 1.3M to 700-800K, depending on the type (including symbols/etc). It should also yield a reduction in compile time as a lot fewer files are compiled. Here are the sizes

We get 2 warnings when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:265:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are declared in gr/nv50.h, so this patch add

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no

On Tuesday 30 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get some warnings when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill'

We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c:496:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nouveau_overlay_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is declared in disp.h, so this patch add missing header dependencies Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 2 +- 1 file

We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c:496:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nouveau_overlay_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is declared in disp.h, so this patch add missing header dependencies Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 2 +- 1 file

Sometimes boot scripts leave the "DLL reset" bit on, but it shouldn't be set on every MR write. V2 addresses this by forcing DLL reset off in MR generation

So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to, NVC0 is the least relevant card -- people with sub-1GB of RAM, older hardware. With my config options

Op 14-09-14 om 10:31 schreef poma: > On 13.09.2014 23:45, Roy Spliet wrote: >> Dear Poma, >> >> Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why >> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has >> narrowed the problem down

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 1:02:52 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c:496:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nouveau_overlay_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is declared in disp.h, so this patch > add missing header dependencies > > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie

On 14.09.2014 11:53, Roy Spliet wrote: > Op 14-09-14 om 10:31 schreef poma: >> On 13.09.2014 23:45, Roy Spliet wrote: >>> Dear Poma, >>> >>> Don't get anyone wrong, your input is greatly valued. The reason why >>> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >>> we don't know or track specific

In bulletpoints: - Add some support for G94 and G96 reclocking. Has been tested on literally two cards, which is hardly adequate as "full coverage". On the other hand, the changes were small enough to make me confident this might work for others as well. - Fix NV50 wait for VBLANK when no monitor is plugged in. - Voltage related inprovements for GT21x. - Slightly improve Keplers

Patch 1 and 2 implement wait-for-vblank, required to remove flicker when reclocking memory Patch 3 and 4 allow me to do things between waiting for VBLANK and disabling FB, like pause PFIFO and wait for the engines to idle. This minimises the time PFIFO is paused, thus maximises performance. The rest of the patches speak for themselves. As the actual memory reclocking script is still somewhat prone

From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau at karolherbst.de> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h | 83 +++++++++---------- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/iccsense.h | 10 +++ drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/subdev.c | 83 +++++++++---------- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 124 +++++++++++++++--------------