similar to: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/gf117-: mark symbols static where possible

We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks this function with 'static'. Signed-off-by:

We get some warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:265:1:

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no

We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks this function with 'static'. Signed-off-by:

On Tuesday 30 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get some warnings when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill'

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous

We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks this function with 'static'. Signed-off-by:

We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are declared in

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote: > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is > declared and don't need a

On 30 August 2016 at 00:01, Sean Paul <seanpaul at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote: > > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no > previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > >

We get 2 warnings when biuld kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/pm/base.c:75:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_perfsig_find' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/pm/base.c:703:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_perfsrc_new' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are declared

On Tuesday 30 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote: > On 30 August 2016 at 00:01, Sean Paul <seanpaul at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote: > > > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no > > previous prototype

We get 2 warnings when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:265:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, these functions are declared in gr/nv50.h, so this patch add

We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c:312:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_gr_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks this function with 'static'. Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104393 Bug ID: 104393 Summary: GF117 volting not possible Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

GF117 appears to use the same register as GK104 (but still with the general Fermi readout mechanism). Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- v1 -> v2: split out different regid into separate file. .../drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/volt.h | 1 + .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 2 +-

2016-10-24 9:13 GMT+02:00 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org>: > > > On 23 October 2016 at 01:32, Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think it would be better to squash those commits: >> 1. for the includes >> 2. for static declerations >> > OK, I have resent new patch that squash those commits. > thanks, this is much

On 23 October 2016 at 01:32, Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be better to squash those commits: > 1. for the includes > 2. for static declerations > > OK, I have resent new patch that squash those commits. > 2016-10-22 11:41 GMT+02:00 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org>: > > We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108980 Bug ID: 108980 Summary: GF117: MMIO write of 0000001f FAULT at 6013d4 [ IBUS ] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

I think it would be better to squash those commits: 1. for the includes 2. for static declerations 2016-10-22 11:41 GMT+02:00 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org>: > We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] >