similar to: [PATCH 0/4] nouveau fixes for RPM/Optimus-related hangs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/4] nouveau fixes for RPM/Optimus-related hangs"

2016 Jul 07
6
[PATCH v2 0/4] nouveau RPM fixes for Optimus
Hi, Here are two patches to fix an issue reported on kernel bugzilla (infinite loop due to unchecked function) and a more important fix to fix hanging Optimus machines when runtime PM is enabled (with pm/pci patches). See the first version[1] for a background on the fixed problems. This is the second revision of incorporating feedback from Emil Velikov (patch 1), Mika Westerberg (patch 4).
2016 Jul 15
8
[PATCH v3 0/4] nouveau RPM fixes for Optimus (final)
Hi, Here are two patches to fix an issue reported on kernel bugzilla (infinite loop due to unchecked function) and a more important fix to fix hanging Optimus machines when runtime PM is enabled (with pm/pci patches). These are the final patches targeting v4.8. Changes compared to v2[1]: collected R-b from Hans and Mika and fixed a minor comment style issue. I recommend it to be merged before
2016 May 27
3
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
Hi Peter, On 24 May 2016 at 23:53, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port > can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This > is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3 > and locks up the kernel on resume. > > Mirror the behavior of
2016 May 30
2
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
On 27 May 2016 at 22:31, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:01:39PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On 24 May 2016 at 23:53, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: >> > Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port >> > can be runtime-suspended which disables
2015 May 25
15
[PATCH 1/8] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
This is especially true when variables or functions are just called dsm without precising the v1. Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 4 +-- drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 4 +-- drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c | 10 ++++---- 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41
2015 May 28
12
[PATCH v2 1/9] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
This is especially true when variables or functions are just called dsm without specifying the v1. Changes since v1: * Fix typo in commit explanation * Change has_dsm to has_mux in nouveau_dsm_detect Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 4 +--
2016 May 14
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: check function before using it
Do not unconditionally invoke function 0x1B without checking for its availability, it leads to an infinite loop on some firmware. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Fixes: 5addcf0a5f0fad ("nouveau: add runtime PM support (v0.9)") Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> --- Hi, I am not sure what exactly 0x1B is used for, it seems related to HDMI
2020 Apr 23
1
[PATCH 1/1] drm/nouveau: Use generic helper to check _PR3 presence
Replace nouveau_pr3_present() in favor of a more generic one, pci_pr3_present(). Also the presence of upstream bridge _PR3 doesn't need to go hand in hand with device's _DSM, so check _PR3 before _DSM. Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 44 ++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 34
2023 Aug 25
7
[PATCH 0/5] Add the pci_get_base_class() helper and use it
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn> There is no function that can be used to get all PCI(e) devices in a system by matching against its the PCI base class code only, while keep the sub-class code and the programming interface ignored. Therefore, add the pci_get_base_class() function to suit the need. For example, if an application want to process all PCI(e) display devices in a
2016 May 24
0
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3 and locks up the kernel on resume. Mirror the behavior of Windows 8 and newer[1] (as observed via an AMLi debugger trace) and stop using the DSM functions for D3cold when
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3 and locks up the kernel on resume (on a Clevo P651RA, GTX965M). Mirror the behavior of Windows 8 and newer[1] (as observed via an AMLi debugger trace) and stop using the
2016 May 27
0
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:01:39PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 24 May 2016 at 23:53, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port > > can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This > > is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device
2016 May 30
0
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:48:34AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 27 May 2016 at 22:31, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:01:39PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> On 24 May 2016 at 23:53, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > >> > Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 3/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: check for function 0x1B before using it
Do not unconditionally invoke function 0x1B without checking for its availability, it leads to an infinite loop on some firmware. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Fixes: 5addcf0a5f0fad ("nouveau: add runtime PM support (v0.9)") Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file
2016 Jul 15
0
[PATCH v3 3/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: check for function 0x1B before using it
Do not unconditionally invoke function 0x1B without checking for its availability, it leads to an infinite loop on some firmware. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Fixes: 5addcf0a5f0fad ("nouveau: add runtime PM support (v0.9)") Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> ---
2016 May 24
0
[PATCH 3/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: check for function 0x1B before using it
Do not unconditionally invoke function 0x1B without checking for its availability, it leads to an infinite loop on some firmware. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Fixes: 5addcf0a5f0fad ("nouveau: add runtime PM support (v0.9)") Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file
2014 Mar 26
3
[PATCH] acpi: allow non-optimus setups to load vbios from acpi
There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
2014 Apr 05
2
[PATCH] acpi: allow non-optimus setups to load vbios from acpi
Hi, same for me. The screen does not freeze anymore and the boot succeeds. But now I have this kernel message during boot (for the second card): [ 24.382045] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): nouveau_pmops_runtime_suspend+0x0/0xe0 [nouveau] returns -22 Do you want to have the complete dmesg log? I think this is a new bug. Your patch works for the previous one, so you can close it. Yours, Claas On
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 1/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: ensure matching ACPI handle and supported functions
Ensure that the returned set of supported DSM functions (MUX, Optimus) match the ACPI handle that is set in nouveau_dsm_pci_probe. As there are no machines with a MUX function on just one PCI device and an Optimus on another, there should not be a functional impact. This change however makes this implicit assumption more obvious. Convert int to bool and rename has_dsm to has_mux while at it. Let
2016 May 25
3
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:53:01AM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port > can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This > is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3 > and locks up the kernel on resume. > > Mirror the behavior of Windows 8 and newer[1] (as