Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/5] drm: fixes for merge-window regressions"
2016 May 18
1
[PATCH 0/5] drm: fixes for merge-window regressions
A couple of new warnings and build errors appeared through the DRM
tree in linux-next after the merge window opened. The first patch
here is for scripts/headers_check.pl, but as the bug is only
present in drm-next at the moment, it would be good to add all
five patches to that tree before they make it into mainline.
It's likely that some of these have already been fixed since
this
2016 May 18
0
[PATCH 0/5] drm: fixes for merge-window regressions
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A couple of new warnings and build errors appeared through the DRM
> tree in linux-next after the merge window opened. The first patch
> here is for scripts/headers_check.pl, but as the bug is only
> present in drm-next at the moment, it would be good to add all
> five patches to that tree before they make it into
2020 Nov 09
1
[PATCH 2/2] drm/mediatek: Use struct dma_buf_map in GEM vmap ops
Fixes a build failure with mediatek.
This change was supposed to be part of commit 49a3f51dfeee ("drm/gem:
Use struct dma_buf_map in GEM vmap ops and convert GEM backends"), but
mediatek was forgotten.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
Fixes: 49a3f51dfeee ("drm/gem: Use struct dma_buf_map in GEM vmap ops and convert GEM backends")
Cc: Thomas
2018 Dec 17
2
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
v2: Make it compile. There was so much compile fail on arm drivers
that I figured
2018 Dec 17
2
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
v2: Make it compile. There was so much compile fail on arm drivers
that I figured
2018 Dec 17
2
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
v2: Make it compile. There was so much compile fail on arm drivers
that I figured
2018 Dec 10
5
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Cc:
2018 Dec 10
5
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Cc:
2018 Dec 10
5
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Cc:
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
> drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
>
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit :
>
> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > > the
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit :
>
> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > > the
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 12:10, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard at linaro.org> a écrit :
>
> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > > the
2019 Jan 15
6
[PATCH] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of
drm_crtc_helper.h includes.
v2: Make it compile. There was so much compile fail on arm drivers
that I figured
2018 Dec 18
1
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
Le lun. 17 déc. 2018 à 21:48, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> > confusing. Split them out.
> >
> > To make sure I actually
2019 Jan 07
2
[PATCH 7/7] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:56:39PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> > confusing. Split them out.
> >
> > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes,
the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a
struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes
create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The
corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver.
In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes,
the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a
struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes
create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The
corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver.
In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes,
the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a
struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes
create_handle() function pointer from drm_framebuffer_funcs. The
corresponding *_create_handle() function is removed from each driver.
In many cases this change eliminates a struct *_framebuffer
2018 Jan 23
6
[PATCH 5/5] drm: Don't pass clip to drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state()
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Move the plane clip rectangle handling into
drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(). Drivers no longer
have to worry about such mundane details.
v2: Convert armada, rcar, and sun4i as well
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey at arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp at