similar to: Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone"

2016 Feb 19
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> But this does not seem to be hooked up yet for nouveau. > > Samuel has patches. See > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~hakzsam/mesa/log/?h=arb_compute_shader_v3 Cool, I will take a look at those. >> So some questions: >> -The commit by
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 19-02-16 20:43, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> But this does not seem to be hooked up
2016 Feb 19
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> But this does not seem to be hooked up yet for nouveau. >> >> >> Samuel has patches. See >>
2016 Feb 18
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > But this does not seem to be hooked up yet for nouveau. Samuel has patches. See https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~hakzsam/mesa/log/?h=arb_compute_shader_v3 > > So some questions: > -The commit by Samual says: > This introduces TGSI_FILE_MEMORY for shared, global and local memory. Only > shared
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi there, On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 19-02-16 20:43, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > Hi there, > > On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: <snip> >> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with >> the recent mesa changes. For starters I would like to get: >> >> src/gallium/tests/trivial/compute.c and then the test with mask 8, >> test_input_global() to work
2016 Feb 23
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 17:59, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On 22-02-16 17:13, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50
2016 Feb 22
4
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>>> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 17:13, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >>>> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a
2016 Feb 22
4
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> INPUT is for shader inputs which come from fixed function loaders. >>> This is not what you want. You want CONST. Stick
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22-02-16 15:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> >>>>
2016 Feb 22
4
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a const >> buffer. As such instead of sticking it into ->set_global_binding, >> you'd stick it into ->set_constant_buffer, and then
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > INPUT is for shader inputs which come from fixed function loaders. > This is not what you want. You want CONST. Stick the input params into > a constbuf, and you're done. Oh, and in case it's not clear, I think this should be done by the st, not by the driver. Not a big fan of the current
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > <snip> > >>> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with >>> the recent mesa changes. For starters I would like to get: >>> >>>
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Well the pipe_loader stuff is buggy in compute.c, I can't even create a screen object... That's sad. It fails in pipe_loader_probe() & co. On 02/22/2016 02:08 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >> On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>>
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 15:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> INPUT is for shader inputs which come from fixed
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hello, > On 22 Feb 2016, at 15:22, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>>
2016 Mar 10
8
[PATCH mesa 0/3] tgsi and nouveau global / local / opencl-input mem support
Hi, Here are patches which implement the support for OpenCL kernel input parameters we discussed. They also add the tgsi parsing bits for adding support for global / local mem, but no implementation yet. Regards, Hans
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 16:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On 22-02-16 15:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>