similar to: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v4)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> > Date:

On 10.11.2015 17:25, Mario Kleiner wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: >>> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> >>> >>> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >>> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: >> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> >> >> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> >> commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:12:33PM +0100, poma wrote: > On 10.11.2015 17:25, Mario Kleiner wrote: > > On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: > >>> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > >>> > >>> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

Cc += Mario Kleiner, Mario, can you take a look whether this proposed solution makes sense and fixes the issues you were seeing back when you posted the patch in commit: commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case. Cards

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> > >> > commit

When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested by me also never made it into nouveau. Maybe pick that up as well? -mario On 12/01/2015 04:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter

On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> > Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 > > drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > >> > period. Therefore that

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> >

Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case. Unfortunately that hack got uprooted in commit

The new atomic modesetting/pageflip code for nv50+ for Linux 4.10+ no longer uses pageflip irq's to signal flip completion. Instead it polls for flip completion from within a kthread/work queue. This creates a race between the vblank irq handler updating the vblank count and timestamp for the vblank of flip completion, and the kthread's polling code detecting flip completion and sending

From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner at tuebingen.mpg.de> Emit kms pageflip completion events with proper vblank count and timestamp for the vblank interval in which the pageflip completed. This makes the timestamps and counts consistent with what the OML_sync_control spec defines. v2 Lucas Stach: rebased on top of nouveau tree and resolved trivial conflict. Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use > drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested > by me also never made it into nouveau. > > Maybe pick that up as well? > > -mario > If you refer to "[1/3]

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:40:32AM +0100, poma wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Mario Kleiner > <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > > When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use > > drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested > > by me also never made it into nouveau. > > > >

On 15.12.2015 12:21, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 15 December 2015 at 11:11, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Apparently not reached @stable (stable: 4.3.3 2015-12-15), >> so here's one more time. >> > It has reached 4.4-rcX and will get picked by the stable maintainer > (Greg?) in due time. Meanwhile you can ask your distro maintainers

Hi, these are two patches against the nouveau kms driver. The first patch makes sure that pageflip completion events get their vblank count and timestamp from the drm. The second patch from Lucas Stach, here included with his permission, makes sure that the timestamps of vblanks are calculated with high precision and robustness. Both patches together make sure that all timestamps returned by the