similar to: [Bug 71455] Thermal management in nouveau running hot 3.12.0+ kernel

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #9 from Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> --- On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:38 AM, <bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org> wrote: > Comment # 8 on bug 71455 from Ilia Mirkin > > Bob, please confirm that newer kernels resolve this issue. > > Evan, your issue is wholly unrelated to the original one. And most likely

Llia, Thanks. Is 3.18.7 recent enough? On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sorry guys I did not understand how bugzilla's user interface works. this >> should be seperate from the thermal management bug.. >> >> On Sat, Feb

Sorry guys I did not understand how bugzilla's user interface works. this should be seperate from the thermal management bug.. On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:51 PM, <bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org> wrote: > Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> changed bug 71455 > <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455> > What Removed Added CC evanfoss at gmail.com

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry guys I did not understand how bugzilla's user interface works. this > should be seperate from the thermal management bug.. > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:51 PM, <bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org> wrote: > >> Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> changed bug 71455 >>

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> wrote: > Llia, > > Thanks. > Is 3.18.7 recent enough? Yes, the fix is in 3.17 and later (commit fe3d9c4b87bb98222a502cc585844a0b950786fb). -ilia

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |evanfoss at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> --- Created attachment 113500

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #1 from Martin Peres <martin.peres at ensi-bourges.fr> --- Hi Bob, Could you send me your kernel logs please? Extracting your vbios could also be of some help later on. Is fan management really working properly for you? I know it is an old card and those were really running hot, but still! -- You are receiving this mail

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #2 from Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> --- Here is an additional data point. The problematic kernel sets 0xb20010f0 to 0x83ff03ff. The driver reports that the PWM is 100%. In fact it is 100% off. As can be expected, the temperature immediately begins repidly rising. Interestingly, the card seems to self protect by

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #3 from Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> --- The fan PWM setting is derived from priv->cstate. The value it gets from there is zero. So the setting of PWM for NV40 is working correctly, "inverting" the percent setting to get the value set in 0xb20010f0. Probably priv->cstate is never initialized.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #4 from Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> --- Oh, the value reported by the driver for the PWM setting is the value before it is set by the driver. It doesn't say that in the kernel message. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #5 from Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #3) > The fan PWM setting is derived from priv->cstate. The value it gets from > there is zero. So the setting of PWM for NV40 is working correctly, > "inverting" the percent setting to get the value set in 0xb20010f0. Probably >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 --- Comment #6 from Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> --- In view of Ben's comment, I am stopping further research. However, I will offer as a final remark that perfE.pstate = 0x20 on my card. It gets into nv40_clock_ctor but the fan speed is never set. According to nvbios, for this card the default setting for the fan speed is

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455 Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Martin Peres

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99900 --- Comment #22 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- "Random anything" is a wholly undiagnosable issue. 4.12.11 resolved a regression in 4.12 which caused EDID to not be read properly over DP. There have been many reports of this causing a variety of issues. Sounds like your issue is wholly unrelated to the original

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56721 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Nouveau driver fails on |[NV4A] Nouveau driver fails |nv40 with error -12 (out of |on nv40 with error -12 (out

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:54:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Ville Syrjala > > <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > >> > >> Replace the ad-hoc iturbt_709

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Mario Kleiner >> <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 03/03/2018 12:59 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:46

Hello, > On 22 Feb 2016, at 15:22, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>>

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at