similar to: [PATCH 1/2] gr: document mp error 0x10

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> This commit also modifies the install path of the main libdrm_nouveau header to be under a nouveau/ subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- include/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 1 + nouveau/Makefile.am | 11 +++- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- nouveau/nvif/cl0080.h | 45 ++++++++++++++

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- include/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 1 + nouveau/Makefile.am | 11 +++- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- nouveau/nvif/cl0080.h | 45 ++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/cl9097.h | 44 ++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/class.h | 141

Hi Ilia, On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:05:21PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Thanks for the quick response! That goes in line with my observations > which is that these things happen when using an ATOM/RED instruction. > I've checked and rechecked that I'm generating ops with identical bits > as what the proprietary driver does, however (and nvdisasm prints

Hi Robert, Thanks for the quick response! That goes in line with my observations which is that these things happen when using an ATOM/RED instruction. I've checked and rechecked that I'm generating ops with identical bits as what the proprietary driver does, however (and nvdisasm prints identical output). Could you advise what the proper way of indicating that the memory is

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- nouveau/abi16.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- nouveau/nouveau.c | 56 +++++++------------------------------------------ nouveau/private.h | 7 ++----- 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/nouveau/abi16.c b/nouveau/abi16.c index

Hello, I've recently come across an error reported by the GPU and would like to know what it means and especially what causes it to be triggered. Any information would be very useful: I'm seeing MP warp error 0x10 (appears in MP register 0x48). This is what we currently have in nouveau: <reg32 offset="0x048" name="TRAP_WARP_ERROR"> <!-- ctx-switched -->

These patches are adding support for outputting 2560x1440 at 56 over HDMI. This needs a pixel clock of 225 MHz which was not supported before. This was tested in a dual monitor setup with a GF114 (GTX 560 TI) and one HDMI monitor running with 2560x1440 at 56 and one DVI monitor running with 1920x1200 at 60. This still needs testing on other graphics cards and with dual link DVI. There is no

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:39:55AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: >> > Hi Ilia, >> > >> > Actually 0x90b8 is different than copy engine. I'm not very familiar >> > with it, but 0x90b8 is

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: > Hi Ilia, > > Actually 0x90b8 is different than copy engine. I'm not very familiar > with it, but 0x90b8 is an engine for performing LZO decompression as > part of performing the copy. It has a variety of limitations (e.g., > cannot handle blocklinear format), and was only in a few Fermi

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> This commit also modifies the install path of the main libdrm_nouveau header to be under a nouveau/ subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- include/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 1 + nouveau/Makefile.am | 11 +++- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- nouveau/nvif/cl0080.h | 45 ++++++++++++++

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > v2: clean up left over comments > don't overwrite hdmimhz parameter > cap to 297MHz > > Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> > --- > drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 5 +++++ > drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >

On 25/11/14 22:05, Andy Ritger wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:39:55AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Andy Ritger <aritger at nvidia.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Ilia,

--- man/nouveau.man | 9 ++++++++- src/nv_driver.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/nouveau.man b/man/nouveau.man index 07d53c8..4878f24 100644 --- a/man/nouveau.man +++ b/man/nouveau.man @@ -63,7 +63,14 @@ GF100, GF104, GF106, GF108, GF110, GF114, GF116, GF117, GF119 GK104, GK106, GK107, GK110, GK208 .TP 22 .B GeForce GTX 750 -GM107 +GM107,

Due to popular demand, I have finally found time to write this up. I had to rush it a little, but hopefully you get the gist. http://www.altechnative.net/2013/11/25/virtualized-gaming-nvidia-cards-part-3-how-to-modify-a-fermi-based-geforce-into-a-quadro-geforce-gts450gtx470gtx480-to-quadro-200050006000/ Any questions, please ask away, and I''ll update the article to expand on those

GR is similar to GP100, with a few unavailable registers. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/engine/gr.h | 1 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/Kbuild | 1 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.h | 4 +++ drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gp100.c | 13 ++++++-- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gp102.c | 1 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gp10b.c |

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 Priority: medium Bug ID: 80506 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Video failed on resume from suspend - G94 / GeForce 9600 GT, 10de:0622 , kernel 3.16 rc2 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > GK20A is mostly compatible with GK104, but features a new 3D > class. Add it to the relevant header and use it when GK20A is > detected. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- > src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv_object.xml.h | 1 + >

Hello, There's a long-standing bug on nouveau (this is a sample bug, but the issue has been around for a while: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85465) whereby we attempt to use the second PCOPY engine on GF116, and it is sometimes does nothing, despite mmio register 22500 saying that it's not disabled (0x22500 == 0 for this user). In the bug you can see a dump from

Hello, A user on an NVC3 card (GF106) is running into data errors on m2mf (class 0x9039) that we haven't seen before: http://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/nvc0-comparison/nvc3-2014-03-17-agashlin/glean/fbo.html http://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/nvc0-comparison/nvc3-2014-03-17-agashlin/spec/!OpenGL%201.1/copyteximage%201D.html Specifically the data errors 0x51 and 0x53, when running

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Robert Morell <rmorell at nvidia.com> wrote: > > Hi Ilia, > > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:05:21PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> Hi Robert, > >> > >> Thanks for the quick response! That goes in line with my observations > >> which is that