similar to: [Bug 92307] New: NV50: WARNING: ... at include/drm/drm_crtc.h:1577 drm_helper_choose_encoder_dpms+0x8a/0x90 [drm_kms_helper]()

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92032 Bug ID: 92032 Summary: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 290 at lib/dma-debug.c:1205 check_sync+0x169/0x6e0() Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92892 Bug ID: 92892 Summary: KDE Plasma locks up: Nouveau reports error "resource sanity check" "unable to handle kernel paging request" Product: Mesa Version: 11.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW

4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 dmesg: [ 11.809467] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x098200a2 [ 11.809493] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] Chipset: G98 (NV98) [ 11.809508] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] Family : NV50 4.3.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 dmesg: [ 2.483843] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA G98 (098200a2) Where vanished these Chipset & Family super cool lines?

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 Bug ID: 93733 Summary: Kernel message spam when HDMI display is turned off Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91954 Bug ID: 91954 Summary: "link training failed": nouveau does not recover from monitor suspend Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use > drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested > by me also never made it into nouveau. > > Maybe pick that up as well? > > -mario > If you refer to "[1/3]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92852 Bug ID: 92852 Summary: NV34: WARNING: ... at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:924 drm_vblank_count_and_time+0x71/0x80 [drm]() Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 Bug ID: 96737 Summary: G98: LightDM 1 : 0 Nouveau Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

With lightweight desktoping, the atomic modesetting seems far from robust. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000021 IP: dma_fence_wait_timeout+0x36/0xf0 ... Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: ... nouveau ... CPU: 0 PID: 6895 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.10.5-1001.fc24.x86_64 #1 ... Call Trace: drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences+0x48/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]

Hi poma, Seems like you're missed your question. "nouveau_drv_video.so ?" does not mean much I'm afraid :-( On 30 June 2016 at 11:03, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > On 30.06.2016 08:27, Xiang, Haihao wrote: >> >> >> Are you using VA-API on X11? libva gets the driver name from Xserver, >> it is nouveau for you. so libva tries to

On 15.09.2014 15:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> Chipset: G98 (NV98) >> Family : NV50 >> >> >> WORKING VIDEO RESUME(S3) >> >> 3.15.0-rc8.1.git.7a014a8 >> 3.15.0-rc8.2.git.456b057 >> 3.15.0-rc8.3.git.b8407c9 >> 3.15.0-rc8.4.git.bb7ef1e >> >>

On 02.12.2014 14:40, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:38 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is this expected result for Chipset: G98 (NV98)? > > Yep, 100% expected. [Perhaps you might glance at the wiki page you got > that from for clues as to why.] > "You basically never need to do the mmiotrace, unless you're a nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93634 Bug ID: 93634 Summary: WARN_ON triggered on DPMS event Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Hello poma, The chipset didn't disappear and is still displayed: it is the G98 you get on the "[ 2.483843] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA G98 (098200a2)" line. The "NV98" was the "Nouveau" chipset, but the switch was made to use the same naming as NVIDIA. So rather than displaying both the Nouveau version of the chipset and the NVIDIA one, it make sense to only

On 02.12.2014 14:52, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:50 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 02.12.2014 14:40, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:38 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Is this expected result for Chipset: G98 (NV98)? >>> >>> Yep, 100% expected. [Perhaps you

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90871 Bug ID: 90871 Summary: NV30: Xfwm4 use_compositing - garbled display Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee:

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping needed for the compression / decompression to work. The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here. Basically, there are two memory mappings of the code. One in "virtual memory", and one in "load memory". The one in

On 09.05.2016 19:37, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Mesa only supports the non-spatial temporal deinterlace (deint=3). I'm > guessing that due to some unfortunate issues, you're no longer getting > hw accelerated video decoding. Check in vdpauinfo to make sure that > it's indeed showing the relevant codec as supported. If not, you can > turn that back on by updating to mesa

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 Priority: medium Bug ID: 83550 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVA5] Monitor not restored after resume [regression] QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter:

On 13.07.2015 15:19, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:03 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 13.07.2015 14:53, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:42 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> A patch like this? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Correct. Have you